When he announced sanctions against key Russian officials on Monday morning, President
We hope he was serious about that. Within hours of Obama's remarks, Russian President
It is important that the U.S. and other nations not accept the conquest of Crimea as a fait accompli. Russia's aggression in Ukraine represents a dangerous flouting of international law that justifies severe reprisals — including, if necessary, a rupture in trade and other economic relationships with the West on which Russia has become increasingly reliant.
Last week German Chancellor
Resistance to such aggression is not, as Obama has emphasized, a move in "some Cold War chessboard in which we're in competition with Russia." Nor is it a refusal to recognize Russia's interests in Crimea. Those interests are legitimate and long-standing. Crimea was part of the Russian Federation until 1954, when it became an autonomous republic within the Soviet Union.
But in mobilizing Russian troops in Crimea, Putin violated solemn promises to respect Ukraine's territorial integrity. He also guaranteed that Sunday's hastily arranged referendum on reuniting Crimea with Russia would lack international legitimacy. It was only a Russian veto that prevented the United Nations Security Council on Saturday from condemning the referendum in advance as having "no validity." Significantly, China, which has supported Russia on other issues, abstained.
It may be that a majority of the inhabitants of Crimea sincerely desire to be ruled by Russia. But no one can take seriously a referendum that was conducted under the guns of foreign troops and offered voters only two choices: reunion with Russia or virtual independence under the terms of a short-lived constitution adopted after the collapse of the Soviet Union. Voters weren't given the option of endorsing Crimea's current political status.
There also are signs that Russia has designs on other regions in Ukraine, especially in the eastern parts of the country. Over the weekend Ukrainian officials reported that Russian troops had seized control of a natural gas distribution station in a region bordering Crimea. The pretext offered for invading Crimea — that Russia was protecting Russian-speaking people threatened by violent Ukrainian nationalists — could easily be extended to justify military action in other parts of the country. Obama seemed to be referring to that possibility Monday when he warned Russia against "further provocations."
Even as he was announcing new sanctions against Russian officials, Obama said that he believed that "there's still a path to resolve this situation diplomatically in a way that addresses the interests of both Russia and Ukraine." He called for Russia to pull back its forces in Crimea to their bases, accept the deployment of international observers in Ukraine and open a dialogue with Ukrainian officials about constitutional reforms that could ensure significant autonomy for Crimea. It is even possible — though Obama didn't mention this scenario — that Crimea could strengthen its ties to Russia without seceding from Ukraine.