Membership
Courtside seats could be yours...
Opinion

The Northwest Salmon Win an Upstream Fight

The Bush administration's plan to protect endangered salmon stocks in the Northwest is shaping up as a battle between a neoconservative political agenda that seeks to roll back landmark environmental protections and the scientific exigencies of the Endangered Species Act.

Last month, U.S. District Judge James Redden ruled that Bush's plan violated the Endangered Species Act. Then on June 10, Redden, still steaming from the administration's "exercise in cynicism," dropped a judicial bomb he had held in reserve.

Despite a projected $69 million in lost revenue, he ordered the Bonneville Power Administration to execute a "summer spill" from four dams to help juvenile salmon reach the sea. After noting that the government's best salmon-recovery efforts have brought native fish stocks to the brink of extinction, Redden challenged the stakeholders — the National Marine Fisheries Service, the Bonneville Power Administration, Indian tribes, conservation organizations and scientists — "to take advantage of this moment" and solve the problem.

Like previous recovery plans for the Columbia River basin, Bush's is no less a manifesto for the status quo stakeholders. Asking politicians to abandon their short-term self-interests to solve long-term problems may be asking the impossible. Consider the history:

•  In 1994, Redden's predecessor, Judge Malcom Marsh, threw out the Clinton administration's salmon-recovery plan because it protected status quo stakeholders at the expense of the fish.

•  President Clinton's new plan, submitted in July 2000, repeated the omissions and violations of his first, and Redden issued an injunction against its implementation.

•  In 2001, fish counts on the Snake River were perilously low. By then, two stocks were declared extinct, and five more were listed as endangered.

•  In 2003, Redden ordered the Bush administration to resubmit a plan in compliance with the Endangered Species Act.

•  In May, Redden declared the new Bush plan grossly inadequate and granted an injunction requested by Columbia River Indian tribes, conservation groups and the state of Oregon, ordering "heavy spills" of dam water this summer.

Federal efforts to rescue threatened salmon stocks began in the mid-1980s. Twenty years and $4.5 billion later, the largest anadromous fish runs in the world are fast approaching the point of no return on the extinction curve. The government's ignominious record is proof that politicians are unequal to the task of enforcing the Endangered Species Act.

Ideally, Redden will have the final word, and he will use it to cut the political Gordian knot so that Columbia River salmon will continue making their extraordinary journey from the mountains to the sea.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Mayor Eric Garcetti's silence on L.A. issues helps no one
    Mayor Eric Garcetti's silence on L.A. issues helps no one

    Averse to controversy and hesitant to take sides, Mayor Eric Garcetti has often avoided staking out positions on divisive issues over his 19-month tenure. But finally, he has taken an unambiguous stand, telling Angelenos that … his favorite movie is “Airplane!”

  • Council proposal to declutter L.A. should be rejected
    Council proposal to declutter L.A. should be rejected

    It goes without saying that being homeless means not having a closet or an attic or a basement to store your belongings. Those worn and filthy shopping carts, boxes, and plastic bags that homeless people are dragging around on the streets of Los Angeles are their possessions, the net worth of...

  • Religion, the workplace and the Supreme Court
    Religion, the workplace and the Supreme Court

    The federal Civil Rights Act bans discrimination in employment on the basis of religion, but it does more than that: Under the law, a company must accommodate the religious practices of workers unless doing so imposes an undue hardship on the conduct of its business. This week, the Supreme...

  • Supreme Court chief justice likely to back healthcare law
    Supreme Court chief justice likely to back healthcare law

    When the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in King vs. Burwell next week, all eyes will be on Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., to try to figure out which way he's leaning. After all, this case is the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act, and the last time the law was before the high...

  • Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress comes at right time, right place
    Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress comes at right time, right place

    Imagine for a moment that your neighbor down the street was engaged in some basement science that could level your house and even kill you, if he so desired. Your best friend, who happens to live some distance away, out of harm's reach, can end the threat to your life and property but is now...

  • The FCC has acted on net neutrality. Now it's Congress' turn
    The FCC has acted on net neutrality. Now it's Congress' turn

    For a decade, Congress twiddled its collective thumbs while the Federal Communications Commission took an increasingly rigorous approach to protecting net neutrality.

Comments
Loading