Opinion
Join The Times' book club. This month's selection: "Cadillac Desert"
Opinion Op-Ed

A Labor Day proposal for labor

Labor Day this year finds American unions plunging into the unknown. Fast-food and retail workers in roughly 60 cities have been demonstrating for a living wage, though how exactly they will win concessions from such mega-corporations as McDonald's remains fuzzy at best. The AFL-CIO, which will convene its biennial national convention in Los Angeles this month, is considering throwing open its ranks to workers who may not actually be union members. Activity is plentiful; uncertainty is rife.

The reasons for the uncertainty are clear: Traditional union organizing in the private sector no longer works. Employers routinely fire workers who seek to organize their companies, and while this is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act, the financial penalties imposed by the law for such transgressions are minimal. Labor's efforts to strengthen that law during the last four Democratic presidencies have failed. In consequence, the share of private-sector workers in unions, which in the middle of the 20th century exceeded one-third of the workforce, has dwindled to 6.6%. The share of the nation's economy — its gross domestic product — going to wages is at its lowest level since World War II.

If unions can't win gains for workers through collective bargaining, how else might they do so? In cities with liberal governments, the campaigns of the fast-food workers might be able to win municipal living-wage ordinances that raise workers' pay. (Some states — California is one — allow cities to set their own minimum-wage rates.) But is there any way that unions can secure legal changes that actually might revive their ability to organize workers and win raises the old-fashioned way?

Richard D. Kahlenberg, a senior fellow at the Century Foundation, and Moshe Z. Marvit, a labor and employment discrimination attorney, think there is. In their book, "Why Labor Organizing Should Be a Civil Right: Rebuilding a Middle-Class Democracy by Enhancing Worker Voice," they argue that workers seeking to organize unions should be covered under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employers from firing or discriminating against workers for reasons of race, gender, age or disability. Under Title VII, the penalties for employers found guilty of violating their workers' rights are far more substantial than those imposed under the NLRA. Since the Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964, it has been a signal success in protecting workers' rights — as the NLRA has not.

There is, of course, one problem with this proposal: Getting it through Congress might prove just as difficult as reforming the NLRA itself. But that doesn't mean this proposal can't be enacted — because many states have their own versions of Title VII written into their statutory codes. The California Fair Employment and Housing Act, for instance, prohibits discrimination or harassment against the same categories of workers that Title VII protects, and adds a few protected categories of its own, such as workers who report patient abuse in hospitals or nursing homes that receive public tax dollars through programs like Medicaid. As with Title VII, the penalties that can be imposed on employers under the California act are substantial.

Under the NLRA, union organizing is a legally protected activity — it's just not protected very well. Extending the protections of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act to workers seeking to form unions would transform what is now only a legal right into an effective right as well. But it would do more than that.

Americans — liberals especially — are troubled by the rise in economic inequality that has imperiled the nation's middle class, and troubled as well that few solutions for this problem are readily apparent. Globalization may have reduced the incomes of Americans in industries that are open to competition from low-wage nations, but the jobs held by most Americans — in sales, construction, transportation, restaurants — can't be outsourced, which means that wage scales aren't affected by those in China. And yet, pay in those sectors has been declining as well.

By making union organizing a civil right, the California Legislature and Gov. Jerry Brown could begin to end this public-policy paralysis. In a state where millions work for low wages, California's leaders could help revive collective bargaining in a nation from which it's almost disappeared, and begin rebuilding the kind of vibrant economy that was once America's and California's calling card to the world.

Harold Meyerson is editor at large of the American Prospect and an op-ed columnist for the Washington Post.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Religion, the workplace and the Supreme Court

    Religion, the workplace and the Supreme Court

    The federal Civil Rights Act bans discrimination in employment on the basis of religion, but it does more than that: Under the law, a company must accommodate the religious practices of workers unless doing so imposes an undue hardship on the conduct of its business. This week, the Supreme Court...

  • California's public unions have too much clout and compensation

    California's public unions have too much clout and compensation

    Mayor Eric Garcetti, a pro-labor Democrat, has tried to restore ties with Los Angeles' public employee unions after most of them backed his opponent in the 2013 mayoral race. Nevertheless, the mayor is sticking with the hard line he has taken in contract talks: asking city workers to accept a three-year...

  • End H-1B visa program's abuse

    End H-1B visa program's abuse

    Information technology workers at Southern California Edison have found themselves in the unhappy position of training their own replacements, thanks to a plan by the utility to outsource their jobs to two India-based staffing companies.

  • Performance reviews are corporate America's curse on itself

    Performance reviews are corporate America's curse on itself

    Ask most managers and employees about the corporate performance review, and the answer probably is the same: It's a pain to give, a pain to get, but a necessary part modern corporate life. It's something we just have to do.

  • With all the nation's problems, GOP leaders pick this labor fight?

    With all the nation's problems, GOP leaders pick this labor fight?

    Late last year, the National Labor Relations Board took some modest steps to try to streamline the process of holding union-recognition elections at work sites. I wrote at the time that key among the new rules are measures to speed up the election timetable and bar legal challenges by management...

  • Fail at your marriage, lose your job

    Fail at your marriage, lose your job

    Three years ago the Supreme Court ruled unanimously that religious organizations enjoy a “ministerial exception” from laws against employment discrimination. That case involved a teacher fired by a Lutheran school that had classified her as a “commissioned minister."

  • The case for higher wages: It's smart business

    The case for higher wages: It's smart business

    Aetna Chief Executive Mark Bertolini announced last month that the insurance giant would hike wages for low-level employees to at least $16 an hour and eventually lower healthcare costs for some workers. The reason? In part, Bertolini wants to cut into the $120 million the company spends each year...

  • Stop exploiting young workers: Here's an alternative to unpaid internships that works

    Stop exploiting young workers: Here's an alternative to unpaid internships that works

    The "intern economy" is a crumbling monument to short-term thinking. The class-action lawsuit filed in 2010 against Fox Searchlight Pictures by former unpaid interns on the film "Black Swan" set off a wave of internship lawsuits that is likely to have lasting consequences for companies with business...

Comments
Loading