Opinion
Join The Times' book club. This month's selection: "Cadillac Desert"
Opinion Op-Ed

You can't work and watch the kids too

It's back-to-school time and parents' worries abound. Will the new teacher be any good? Will my child have friends in the new class? Will budget cuts limit the offerings in art, music or sports?

There's one worry that's universal: Are my kids safe after school?

The combination of shorter school days and the lack of after-school child care creates a mismatch for many full-time employed parents, especially mothers. Imagine that you have a child whose school day ends at

2 p.m. but you don't get home until 6 p.m. or later. So, for about 25 hours each week, you are on edge about your child's welfare while you try to concentrate on your job.

In these cost-cutting times, the number of after-school programs is shrinking, school libraries and many playgrounds are no longer open after school, and city streets are increasingly unsafe. For children ages 9 to 11, 10.5% are in "self-care" after school, according to 2011 census data. For children 12 to 14 years old, the figure is 32.7%. Unsupervised teenagers are vulnerable to many risky behaviors, such as drugs, alcohol, sexual acting out and crime.

One of us — Barnett — conducted a study of parental concerns about after-school time, and found some troubling patterns. The survey involved 1,755 parents employed full time who had a spouse/partner who also worked full time (44.7% fathers, 55.3% mothers). Only one parent in a couple was interviewed; all interviewees worked at one of three U.S. Fortune 100 companies.

Among the findings was that parental concern was high when work hours were long, parents had little control over work schedules and children spent time unsupervised after school. Not surprisingly, higher levels of concern were associated with more job disruptions. Parents found themselves unable to concentrate. It is hard to focus on your job when you're anxious about your children's well-being after school. Mothers' traditional role as the caregiver made them more vulnerable to these kinds of worries. Parents who had high concerns also reported high levels of anxiety and depression.

This is a problem that parents — again, especially mothers — can't easily solve on their own. Too many parents put together a "patchwork quilt" of caretakers — neighbors, friends, relatives, sitters. Often, such arrangements fall apart at the last minute. Heightened stress and anxiety are the result. One single mother we interviewed had arranged for her kids to stay with a neighbor. But the kids didn't like the neighbor's children and hated going there. Every day there was a battle, with the mother feeling guilty and torn. But it was their only option.

Research tells us that employers can do much to help relieve some of this burden. When employees have control over their schedules, for example, they are less likely to experience high levels of concern. More than three-fourths of the respondents to Barnett's study said that the flexibility to arrive at work later, leave work earlier or take off part of a workday when necessary significantly reduces concern levels.

Many other nations offer a variety of after-school options, and it's absurd that the U.S. lags behind much of the world in this area. In France, for example, the school day often doesn't end until 6 p.m.

Yet workplace supports — when they do exist — are effective only if employees know about them and feel comfortable using them. Barnett's study found that many parents are not aware that certain supports are available. And if they do know about them, they often fear that taking time off and using flexible work arrangements could jeopardize opportunities for advancement. Other research shows that even women and men in leadership positions feel that using flexible work arrangements could jeopardize their careers.

These parental concerns also have serious consequences for employers. By some estimates, workplace stress costs companies $50 billion to $300 billion each year in lost productivity. About 2.5 million working parents are overly stressed by after-school concerns and are likely to bring them to the workplace. These concerns are exacerbated for the parents who have more responsibility for child care in the household, who work longer hours and whose children are older (grades 6-12) because these kids tend to spend more time unsupervised.

There's a fledgling movement to create and expand after-school programs, but effective programs are few and far between. In fact, such programs and policies are often not costly to implement. Compared with the huge losses for companies because of employees' stress and anxiety over this issue, the cost of providing secure after-school environments is trivial.

We all have a stake in helping working parents be as productive on the job as possible. We can't get there if constant worry about their children is draining parents' energies and diverting their attention. Happily, a win-win scenario is cheap and close at hand — if we only have the will to create it.

Rosalind C. Barnett is a senior scientist at the Women's Studies Research Center at Brandeis University and Caryl Rivers is a journalism professor at Boston University. They are the authors of the forthcoming book, "The New Soft War on Women."

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • No Child Left Behind: how to end 'teaching to the test'

    No Child Left Behind: how to end 'teaching to the test'

    When U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said last year that the incessant focus on testing was “sucking the oxygen” out of public school classrooms, his statement seemed like a pointed criticism of the federal No Child Left Behind Act and of his own long-standing policies. For the last 14 years,...

  • Back to work at L.A. Unified

    Back to work at L.A. Unified

    Voters — few though they were — sent some strong messages to the Los Angeles Unified school board Tuesday. That two incumbents were voted out showed justified unhappiness with the current board. People are still mad about the badly mishandled plan to purchase iPads for every student in the district....

  • California students shouldn't get placed in fake classes

    California students shouldn't get placed in fake classes

    When it was revealed that students at Jefferson High School in South Los Angeles and other schools were being assigned to "classes" in which nothing was actually taught, many people wondered how this could happen. Isn't it against the law to stick kids in fake classes and deprive them of basic...

  • Time for California lawmakers to repeal cap on school reserves

    Time for California lawmakers to repeal cap on school reserves

    Hundreds of California school districts, from liberal-leaning Berkeley to the conservative Central Valley, joined the California State PTA, county education officials, education groups and civil rights advocates to support Assembly Bill 1048. The bill would repeal a widely reviled cap on how much...

  • A new superintendent won't cure all that ails L.A. Unified

    A new superintendent won't cure all that ails L.A. Unified

    With John Deasy no longer in charge at the Los Angeles Unified School District, the school board needs a new superintendent who shares his passion for improving the lives of children in poverty, but not his adversarial approach or his refusal to listen to critics.

  • Four reasons to be glad a federal grand jury is investigating L.A. Unified's iPads

    Four reasons to be glad a federal grand jury is investigating L.A. Unified's iPads

    There was a lot to dislike about the proposal to buy $500 million worth of iPads for Los Angeles Unified School District students (plus $800 million for the necessary broadband at schools): The price, the incomplete curriculum, the paucity of serious questions about whether all of these devices...

  • L.A. Unified needs to do its homework on college-prep standards

    L.A. Unified needs to do its homework on college-prep standards

    It’s much easier for members of the L.A. Unified school board sitting on the dais to pass stringent and unrealistic new standards than it is for teachers on the ground to carry them out. Case in point: the district’s requirement that all students take the full schedule of college-prep courses —...

  • LAUSD needs precautions to prevent another Miramonte-type scandal

    LAUSD needs precautions to prevent another Miramonte-type scandal

    The sexual abuse of students at Miramonte Elementary School was creepy beyond measure, involving a "game" in which third-graders were blindfolded and fed cookies tainted with their teacher's semen. But the astonishing $139-million legal settlement — on top of an earlier $30-million settlement with...

Comments
Loading