The Los Angeles Times endorsements in the March 3 election
Opinion Opinion L.A.

Paris, we (Americans) are here again, to solve your 'love locks' problem

Paris, here's a simple solution to your 'love locks' problem: bolt cutters
C'mon, Parisians, you beheaded a king once. What's so hard about cutting off a few love locks?

France — or, to be specific, Paris — has a problem. But, in the spirit of “Lafayette, we are here (again),” never fear, mon amis, I have a solution.

The problem? Thousands and thousands of tourists. OK, right, that’s not new. But since 2008, thousands of those thousands have been putting “love locks” on the Pont des Arts, a bridge across the Seine near the Louvre. Lovers pledge their troth (or just smooch), lock a lock onto the bridge and then throw the key into the river. (Think of it like getting married in Vegas, only without the paperwork.)

Voila! Tres romantique, oui?

Non. Tres mal!

(Full disclosure: I don’t speak French. But I do have Google Translate.)

Anyway, over the weekend, a hunk of the bridge railing fell down under the weight of all that love. Even worse, the French authorities seem at a loss as to what to do.

Which, frankly, surprises me. You see, I recall visiting Paris in 2004 with my wife and two young sons. After a tour of Les Invalides, we strolled across the grounds, and the boys, as young boys will, sprinted off across the grass. Instantly, a gendarme appeared, avec whistle (which he blew, loudly), and gestured that we were most certainly not supposed to be on the grass.

Yes these same officious folks have spent six years trying to figure out how to keep this one bridge lock-free, without success?

Sheesh. Time for some American know-how (and I’m not talking about the petition that a couple of Americans living in Paris have started to ban the practice).

Listen up, Lafayette, here’s what you do:

First, go buy your maintenance guys a good pair of bolt cutters. Maybe a few pair. Have them start at the middle. Cut a lock. Throw it into a trash can. Repeat. If you’re short of public workers (or if they’re on another long lunch break), maybe you could go to the Bastille and get some inmate workers. (What, no more Bastille? When did that happen?)

Second (and this is the real hard part), you might want to post a guard or two at the bridge. All the time. Yes, even at night. And weekends. And all of those holidays. Even during, ahem, long lunch hours.

I know, I know. Parliament will have to debate this. Labor laws will have to be rewritten. Union rules too. But give it a shot. After all, you guys once overthrew royalty and beheaded the king. Napoleon conquered most of Europe (sorry about that whole Russia thing). You can do this.

Now, probably, after a few months, people will get the idea and you can cut back to one guard. And one bolt cutter.

Yes, the lover lockers may move on to a different bridge. You know how lovers are. Of course you do. You’ve been luring, and fleecing, young lovers for a long time. But you can do it. You see, you can use the same technique at the new bridge. It works for all bridges. You’ve head of “broken windows” policing? Same thing, but with a bridge.

I hope this helps. True, you may not read this right away, what with the time difference and the shorter work hours and shorter workweeks and all.

But I hope you get on it soon. You see, my wife and I are coming to Paris in November.

Don’t make me bring my bolt cutters.

Follow Paul Whitefield on Twitter @PaulWhitefield1

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Council proposal to declutter L.A. should be rejected
    Council proposal to declutter L.A. should be rejected

    It goes without saying that being homeless means not having a closet or an attic or a basement to store your belongings. Those worn and filthy shopping carts, boxes, and plastic bags that homeless people are dragging around on the streets of Los Angeles are their possessions, the net worth of...

  • Religion, the workplace and the Supreme Court
    Religion, the workplace and the Supreme Court

    The federal Civil Rights Act bans discrimination in employment on the basis of religion, but it does more than that: Under the law, a company must accommodate the religious practices of workers unless doing so imposes an undue hardship on the conduct of its business. This week, the Supreme...

  • Supreme Court chief justice likely to back healthcare law
    Supreme Court chief justice likely to back healthcare law

    When the Supreme Court hears oral arguments in King vs. Burwell next week, all eyes will be on Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., to try to figure out which way he's leaning. After all, this case is the latest challenge to the Affordable Care Act, and the last time the law was before the high...

  • Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress comes at right time, right place
    Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress comes at right time, right place

    Imagine for a moment that your neighbor down the street was engaged in some basement science that could level your house and even kill you, if he so desired. Your best friend, who happens to live some distance away, out of harm's reach, can end the threat to your life and property but is now...

  • The FCC has acted on net neutrality. Now it's Congress' turn
    The FCC has acted on net neutrality. Now it's Congress' turn

    For a decade, Congress twiddled its collective thumbs while the Federal Communications Commission took an increasingly rigorous approach to protecting net neutrality.

  • As Wisconsin goes, so goes the nation? Let's hope not
    As Wisconsin goes, so goes the nation? Let's hope not

    When Gov. Scott Walker signs the “right-to-work” bill moving through the Wisconsin state legislature, it will feel something like a tipping point. Wisconsin will become the 25th state to adopt such anti-union measures, which will mean that half the states will have barred...