Get Opinion in your inbox -- sign up for our weekly newsletter
Opinion L.A.
Opinion Opinion L.A.

Money to burn -- paying to fight California's wildfires

In seven weeks, California has burned through more than a quarter of its state firefighting budget of $172 million.

The Rim fire in and around Yosemite alone has chewed up 15% of that budget, and the fire season is in its early days yet.

Statewide, California 2013 has gotten maybe a quarter of the rainfall of California 2012.

The Rim fire is the seventh largest in the state’s history.

The average wildfire is now five times bigger than it was 30 years ago.

Get my drift? The blaze business as usual isn’t going to cut it. Conflagration is the new normal.

California needs a new game plan. It needs a plan for fighting fires crafted by experts. (Last year, the U.S. Forest Service blew off the results of a study it asked for from the Rand Corp. Rand said the service should use cheaper water-scooping planes instead of the more expensive retardant-dropping air tankers.)

California also needs a new budget plan crafted by politicians for paying for fighting the fires.

Firefighting budgets are a patchwork, like the fire lines and political jurisdiction lines themselves. The state has about 900 fire departments, and many of them, according to Demetrious Shaffer, the Alameda County fire chief who heads the state’s fire chiefs’ association, have closed stations, laid off firefighters and cut hiring to save money.

The Forest Service has hacked away 500 firefighting jobs, and when there are more fires than money to fight them, it does what other fire agencies do: it picks its own pockets, thereby cutting back on services like road and campground and wildlife maintenance.

If the fires outrun the budget to fight them, it comes out of the general fund.

A $150 fire fee passed with a majority vote a couple of years ago on 850,000 property owners in certain fire-prone areas is being challenged by the Howard Jarvis Taxpayers Assn. Complicating it even further is the unintended consequence, that the fund could drain state firefighting funds by sending money to local efforts.

In sum, as Times columnist George Skelton wrote, it’s in need of overhaul. Gov. Gray Davis and the Legislature whacked the Cal Fire budget in 2003, then passed a parcel fee supposedly for fire protection. The Legislature and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger repealed that one. More recently, the Legislature took $200 million from Cal Fire, put it back in the general fund and replaced it with the contentious “fire prevention fee” -- no net gain in firefighting services, and the fire crew staffing was cut by 25%.

Last year, L.A. County fire faced as much as $50 million in cuts from its budget, but it protected firefighting services -- meaning other services, vital in their own way, had to be whacked. And counties now summon other counties to help, if they’re not already busy fighting their own.

And then there’s the how-not-to example of San Diego County, the only major urban county in California without its own fire department. Again and again, massive killer fires rip across its neighborhoods, and again and again, voters reject tax proposals (good and bad) to strengthen its firefighting.

The California Chaparral Institute website refers to San Diego as a “welfare county” for firefighting, depending on sister fire agencies, state and local, to send their forces to help out, which means that well-organized agencies are subsidizing San Diego.

“Although no official will say so publicly,” the website said, “there may come a time when fire agencies will refuse to send firefighting resources to the county during major firestorm events because their first obligation is to their own citizens -- the people who paid for the services in the first place.”

Californians know that fires are as much a part of the kinetic landscape as earthquakes, and yet the state seems to treat fires more like a kind of unpleasant annual surprise.

Isn't it time that those 900 fire agencies and 58 counties and the Legislature get on the same page with a consistent, integrated plan, with a consistent chunk of money dedicated to making it happen it?

Yeah, that’s a hot one.


Yes to an earthquake alert system

Monica Ratliff, new teacher on board

The Rim fire and the folly of sequestration

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Egypt's muffling of news media is an outrage

    Egypt's muffling of news media is an outrage

    In sentencing three Al Jazeera television journalists to three years in prison for crimes that look suspiciously like committing journalism, an Egyptian court has ruled in direct contradiction to international human rights and press freedoms. That an American ally — and the recipient of $1.3 billion...

  • A Biden candidacy could divide the Democrats

    A Biden candidacy could divide the Democrats

    Joe Biden hasn't decided whether to run for president, but he tells almost everyone who asks that he's giving it serious thought.

  • 'God's authority' doesn't apply in the Rowan County Courthouse

    'God's authority' doesn't apply in the Rowan County Courthouse

    On Thursday, Kim Davis, an elected clerk in Rowan County, Ky., who has steadfastly refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples, is expected to appear before a federal judge who could find her in contempt of court and jail or fine her. Neither sanction will be necessary if Davis does...

  • Beyond $15 an hour: The new generation of labor leaders

    Beyond $15 an hour: The new generation of labor leaders

    In the 121 years since Labor Day became a national holiday, millions have taken it as a day of rest. For labor leaders, though, it's a day about work: working the politicians, working the issues of pay and benefits in a country where wages for many of those millions have hit the skids. Laphonza...

  • California, finally coming out of solitary

    California, finally coming out of solitary

    New limits on solitary confinement in California prisons are a long-delayed but welcome step in the evolution of a system that only recently subjected inmates to a degree of abuse that approached torture.

  • Why a car-centric transportation plan is folly for L.A.

    Why a car-centric transportation plan is folly for L.A.

    The knock on L.A.'s Mobility Plan 2035 is that it will slow down traffic. After the City Council approved the blueprint, the community group Fix the City wrote that "MP2035 is not a mobility plan, it is a plan designed to create immobility." It has a point. The city wants to redesign several thoroughfares...