Join The Times' book club. This month's selection: "Cadillac Desert"
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

Speaking up for golf courses and country clubs

To the editor: Jim Newton's evidence supports his assertion that wealthy country clubs are getting an unfair tax break thanks to Proposition 13. So what's the alternative? Tax the clubs to death so they are forced to sell their land to developers, who will tear out the golf courses, grass and trees and build streets and high-rises there? ("Know what else Prop. 13 does? It gives tax breaks to country clubs," Op-Ed, June 30)

Personally, I've never belonged to any country club. But I can tell you that we must support preserving whatever green space we do have over allowing bad architecture, overdevelopment, traffic nightmares and parking congestion.

There's something that's more important than a plebeian sense of economic justice here. It's called quality of life.

Richard Rothschild, Los Angeles


To the editor: Newton cites inequities in property taxes without mentioning apartment complexes.

As I recall from 1978, Howard Jarvis did not spearhead the Proposition 13 campaign on the part of homeowners but rather on the part of the apartment building owners. Jarvis co-opted homeowners to get their favorable votes.

Yes, homeowners received a benefit, but apartment owners really did well. A small case in point: The property tax on an eight-unit apartment complex I own, purchased before Proposition 13, costs me $5,843 a year. The property tax on the house my daughter and son-in-law purchased after Proposition 13 costs them $9,948 a year.

Yes, I could voluntarily pay more for my apartment house, but that isn't the point. Proposition 13 can never be changed as it applies to homeowners, but it can be amended for apartment owners and commercial and industrial properties.

Martin A. Brower, Corona del Mar


To the editor: Here we go again, hammering away at poor old Proposition 13.

Newton fingers the Wilshire Country Club as an unintended beneficiary. My late husband and I joined the club in 1979 because he loved golf. I am not, by anyone's standard, a wealthy person, nor are many of the club's other members.

There are a great many people employed by the Wilshire Country Club who work on the golf course, in the dining rooms and in the locker rooms, and they are all loved by the members. In some cases, several generations of family members are or have been employed by the club. Give the club a break.

And for the record, my own home is protected by Proposition 13, thank God. Otherwise, I might not be able to afford to live in my wonderful home at the age of 88 on a retirement income.

Barbara Hardesty, Los Angeles

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Know what else Prop. 13 does? It gives tax breaks to country clubs.

    Know what else Prop. 13 does? It gives tax breaks to country clubs.

    When California voters overwhelmingly approved Proposition 13 in 1978, they were responding to a populist outcry over steeply rising property taxes, which especially hurt older homeowners living on fixed incomes. Proposition 13 dictated that property could be taxed at a maximum rate of 1% of its...

  • How much good will urban water cuts do?

    How much good will urban water cuts do?

    To the editor: I agree with Nathanael Johnson that it's time to stop approaching the conversation about water use as one about "farms versus cities," but for reasons different than his. Finger-pointing simply misses the point. ("In the water crisis, it's time to move beyond the farms vs. cities...

  • Late thrill seeker Dean Potter draws readers' wrath and admiration

    Late thrill seeker Dean Potter draws readers' wrath and admiration

    Our letter writers tend to be at their least sympathetic reacting to high-profile tragedies in which the people who died or were injured put themselves at risk. Last year, for example, few writers spared their criticism of the five Orange County teenagers who died early one morning after a night...

  • Forecasting the outcome of Bush vs. Clinton

    To the editor: Jonah Goldberg's keen insights into the problems facing Republican Jeb Bush's presidential candidacy overlook a thorny good news, bad news dilemma for the GOP, one that will persist so long as Hillary Rodham Clinton remains the presumptive Democratic nominee. ("Jeb Bush has bigger...

  • Low pay is but one problem in L.A.'s business climate

    To the editor: As a second-generation owner of a business that has operated in Los Angeles for more than 40 years, I support higher wages for my hardworking employees. However, we compete with several companies located in federal minimum wage states or Mexico. How will the city protect a company...

  • Oil companies should bear the risks of drilling and production

    To the editor: When I read about the oil spill near Santa Barbara, I heard the voices of Sarah Palin and John McCain shouting, "Drill, baby, drill." Instead, we need to apply two words when confronting threats to the environment: risk and reward. ("Santa Barbara oil spill: Pipeline operator has...

  • Why rooftop solar users should pay to maintain the grid

    To the editor: Evan Gillespie fails to point out some important reasons the California Public Utilities Commission might rework a rate structure that he says protects those who use the least amount of energy. ("PUC may short-circuit California's fair, progressive electricity rate policy," op-ed,...

  • Buying organic isn't just about personal health

    To the editor: Walking or working out is an investment in our health, instead of spending that time making more money. Similarly, buying organic food is investing not only in our own health, but in everyone's health. ("Is organic food worth the higher price? Many experts say no," May 19)