OpinionReaders React
Readers React

'Great Streets' in L.A.: a work in progress

Eric GarcettiHousing and Urban Planning

To the editor: Perhaps the most successful Great Streets program to date is in Washington. In 2006, I served on an Urban Land Institute panel that helped the nation's capital implement its Great Streets program. ("Mayor sets out to transform L.A. streets through 'urban acupuncture'," July 26)

Washington's Great Streets program serves as the template for the Los Angeles initiative. However, the former's program is much more ambitious than ours.

When then-Mayor Anthony Williams announced the Washington program in 2005, it was seen as a seven-boulevard, $100-million public-private initiative. The program has since expanded to 15 boulevards and $200 million, in a public-private partnership that is revitalizing neglected corridors.

Despite its more modest goals, the Los Angeles Great Streets program does offer hope for the 15 neglected boulevards, as long as a strong public-private partnership can be developed and sustained over time.

Philip S. Hart, Los Feliz


To the editor: The backers of the Great Streets program who are using Abbot Kinney Boulevard in Venice as an example of the success they are trying to achieve are overlooking the effect this "success" has had on the local neighborhood.

While the city enjoys the sales tax boom generated by the street, the impact on those of us who live nearby has been totally negative, with increased traffic congestion and an already impossible parking situation made worse. Plus, most of the businesses created don't cater to locals, few of whom can afford the "prices to rival Rodeo Drive."

To those residents looking forward to the creation of a "Great Street" in their neighborhood, my advice is to be careful what you wish for.

Manuel Katz, Venice

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
Eric GarcettiHousing and Urban Planning
  • If we fight wars, we must take care of our veterans

    To the editor: Thanks to columnist Steve Lopez for keeping the issues facing veterans like Paul Cooper and others with CalVet's West Los Angeles Veterans Home in the news. ("For ailing veterans, endless government delays," Sept. 13)

  • Supt. Deasy is a distraction for LAUSD

    To the editor: Los Angeles Unified School District Supt. John Deasy got it right. At this point, the iPad scandal is not an internal LAUSD problem, it's a political issue. It became so from the instant that the public found out about emails that suggest a conflict of interest....

  • With corporate citizens like these, who needs regulators?

    To the editor: Consumers who want to guard their privacy continue to pay for not having their information published in the phone book's residential listings — which no longer exist. Not only is that absurd, it is the height of corporate greed and hubris. ("Paying to stay out...

  • Why the post-Rim fire logging plan won't fly

    To the editor: The editorial failed to acknowledge that logging will occur in every home range of the imperiled California spotted owl in the burn area. That is not a reasonable plan. ("A logging plan even an environmentalist can love," Editorial, Sept. 3)

  • The 'sincerely held belief' slippery slope

    To the editor: Once again the religious right shamelessly seeks the "sincerely held beliefs" license to discriminate. ("Don't use religion to cloak bias toward LGBT families," Op-Ed, Sept. 10)

  • A business-friendly tax structure for California

    To the editor: The point of this editorial is well taken: We should find out if special tax incentives do in fact pay for themselves. ("Do tax incentives really create jobs?," Editorial, Sept. 10)