Special Report: As a deadly superbug spread, UCLA doctors raced to find the source
Los Angeles Times

Council redistricting panel should reject 1-in-one plan

The commission charged with making a recommendation on how current County Council districts should be realigned ought to reject the more radical of the three proposed plans, which would lump the entirety of the Route 1 corridor into one district.

While it's entirely healthy and appropriate to consider distinct alternatives, this is one that the commission would do well to dismiss rapidly.

Both proponents and detractors point to the importance of revitalization efforts in the county's easternmost sliver. Those who like the idea having all of Howard County's portion of U.S. 1 under one councilmanic roof say it would give the corridor a focused advocate. Under the current setup, Route 1 communities fall into three different districts, which also include neighborhoods of Ellicott City, Columbia and other places that don't share Route 1's set of issues.

As one speaker at the commission's Sept. 21 hearing put it, making this change would give the corridor "one strong voice instead of three whispers."

However, this view assumes that the interests and outlook of Elkridge coincide with those in Jessup or North Laurel, which isn't necessarily always the case.

Moreover, having the representation of three council members instead of one means a council majority that has some stake in Route 1's prosperity. Other residents who spoke at the hearing insisted that council members serving under the current alignment have all been responsive to the corridor's concerns.

Presumably, the one-district-for-the-corridor plan would also assuage those who believe Columbia has too much power under the current alignment. Three of the five current members have Columbia addresses. Two of those districts also include portions of the Route 1 corridor.

There's no law, however, that says a Columbia resident has to have both or either of those two seats. We've seen credible campaigns by candidates from other communities in those districts.

The current setup has its flaws, but generally speaking has served constitents in each district well. Minor modifications corresponding to population shifts should suffice.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Supreme Court sides with the people, not the politicians

    Supreme Court sides with the people, not the politicians

    Today the Supreme Court reinforced the principle that the voters should choose their representatives, not the other way around, in upholding an Arizona law that puts the task of drawing congressional district boundaries in the hands of an independent commission rather than the legislature. Maryland,...

  • Partisan redistricting undermines representative democracy [Letter]

    Partisan redistricting undermines representative democracy [Letter]

    I read with interest the recent article "Carroll conservatives clash with Van Hollen" (Nov. 12). I could readily relate to Carroll County Republican Bill Schroeder's statement — "We have nothing in common with Montgomery County — absolutely nothing" — concerning his representative, Chris Van Hollen,...

  • Straddling the city-county divide

    Straddling the city-county divide

    In a recent editorial you noted that Lt. Gov. Anthony G. Brown, who lives in Prince George's County, followed the traditional formula of appealing to the Baltimore region by choosing Howard County Executive Ken Ulman as his running mate ("Twin controversies for Gansler," Oct. 14).

  • The business case for redistricting reform

    The business case for redistricting reform

    Our view: Sure, CEOs want lower taxes, but they're also interested in good government

  • Drawing a line on Md. gerrymandering

    Drawing a line on Md. gerrymandering

    This Feb. 14, will mark the 93rd anniversary of the founding of the League of Women Voters, an organization that was built on the efforts to secure for women the right to vote and continues its work by providing information to all voters to ensure that the right is exercised effectively.

  • Congressional redistricting could be done in a zip

    Like many Marylanders, I am frankly embarrassed by the strange congressional districts just approved by the electorate. I humbly suggest that future redistricting efforts attempt to make more compact districts in which the representatives can better attend to local issues.

  • Time to reform redistricting

    Gerrymandering is never going to change — unless we fix this states' problems from the ground up. The recent gerrymandering of congressional districts made me come to the realization that the only way Marylanders voices will be heard is if we force our elected officials to step out of the redistricting...

  • A referendum on referendums?

    A referendum on referendums?

    Our view: The criticism by Gov. O'Malley and others in Annapolis that petitioning a law to referendum has become 'too easy' is a bit too easy, too