Do-it-yourself is a familiar concept to frugal consumers. If you're handy, doing home repairs yourself can save a bundle, for example.
But do-it-yourself doesn't always pay. One prime example is selling a home by yourself.
Selling a house without using a real estate agent is tempting because, if successful, you could save thousands of dollars in sales commissions. Saving that money might be even more appealing if you had to slash the asking price because of a sluggish real estate market, which is where most home sellers find themselves today. It could also be enticing if you had an exotic mortgage that added borrowing to your principal, and you owe more than your home is worth. You also may simply want complete control over the selling process.
But the disadvantages of for sale by owner (known as FSBO) efforts are potentially just as large as the savings. That's especially true in a buyer's housing market, where drumming up interested sellers is much more difficult than a few years ago.
Cutting out the real estate agent could end up being a decision that's penny-wise but dollar-foolish.
The basic formula is this: Will a successful FSBO save you enough in real estate commissions to make up for the market knowledge, potentially higher selling price, marketing efforts, deal negotiations and paperwork preparation that a real estate agent offers?Today, one in eight homes is sold by owner. And nearly half of successful FSBO sellers knew the buyer before the sale and didn't try to sell the home on the open market, according to data from the National Association of Realtors. Fewer than half of FSBO sellers said they would sell another house by themselves.
Clark Howard, an author and syndicated radio-show host, is a self-proclaimed cheapskate who loves a bargain. But on the subject of real estate commissions, he recommends that most people pony up for an agent.
"In most cases, people who do FSBOs basically just waste time until they hire an agent," said Howard, who's newest book is "Clark Smart Real Estate."
The topic of FSBO transactions is wide-ranging and controversial, but here are a few considerations:
-- Commission savings
Some FSBO home sellers might be under the impression they can save the entire 5 percent or 6 percent commission for selling a house. That's not necessarily true. Unless your buyer doesn't have an agent, you'll have to pay 2.5 percent to 3 percent to the buyer's agent. So commission savings on a $250,000 home sale would be $6,250 to $7,500.
That's a lot of money. But then you must deduct do-it-yourself marketing expenses. That might include advertising and hundreds of dollars to be on the Multiple Listing Service, the primary database for home listings. You might also spend money hiring a lawyer to draw up a sales contract and incur myriad smaller costs.
You also must put a price tag on the time required to sell a house yourself. If an FSBO transaction is slower than one with an agent, you might end up making an extra mortgage payment or two. For example, if you already bought a new home, a quicker sale on the old home means you carry two mortgages for less time. That all goes into the calculations when running the numbers on whether paying a commission is worthwhile.
-- Selling price
This is a hotly debated topic. Will an agent secure you a higher selling price? The National Association of Realtors claims homes sold by its realty agents bring 16 percent higher prices on average. On the other hand, a study released earlier this summer by economists from Northwestern University and the University of Wisconsin showed FSBO sellers in Madison, Wis., made out better than if they had hired an agent and paid a commission. But Madison has a more-robust-than-usual local FSBO Web site, and the researchers' calculations placed no value on services provided by an agent.
In the end, the tussle over a higher selling price might be the wrong focus. Your concern should be attracting the most buyers. If enough buyers know about your home, multiple bids would ultimately set the appropriate price, regardless of your method of selling. So the question becomes: Can you, as a FSBO, market the house as well as a real estate agent?
To be successful, FSBO sellers must be as objective about the house and its shortcomings as an agent would be. "You better have ice water in your veins, or don't try to sell your own place," Howard said. "If you have an open house, you better swallow your pride because one buyer after another will come in there and insult the daylights out of you. People will even criticize your furniture."
Objectivity also will help set the initial asking price. Setting a price too high is a common mistake by FSBO sellers. "You end up having to discount it below what it would have sold for if it was priced right as a fresh listing," Howard said. A house that sits on the market can become stigmatized--buyers assume there must be something wrong with it.
"Most of us don't have the merchant mentality to sell a house ourselves," Howard said, adding that a formalized multiweek sales plan is a must for FSBO sellers.
Nowadays, you have more choices than just FSBO and a full-service agent. Some agents offer services a la carte, so you can pick and choose which type of help you want. "There's every blend of real estate service available that you can think of," Howard said.
When it comes to selling a home, spending smart involves not only what you spend but what you get for your money.
Gregory Karp is a personal finance writer for The Morning Call, a Tribune Co. newspaper in Allentown, Pa. E-mail him at firstname.lastname@example.org.Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times