After four years of delays, officials in charge of updating DuPage County's emergency radio network declared in December 2010 that they finally had reached a solution with Motorola to have a new system running within a year.
But instead of a modern radio network, all the DuPage Emergency Telephone System Board will have when that deadline passes Thursday is its familiar refrain: Wait till next year.
As Motorola's contract with the county drags into its sixth year, most of DuPage's emergency responders continue to use the same antiquated radio systems instead of an updated network that meets federal guidelines instituted after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
In January, the Tribune reported that the $7 million contract DuPage first signed with Motorola in September 2006 had more than quadrupled in cost.
That original contract — funded through fees on land line and cellphone users' bills — called for the Schaumburg-based telecommunications giant to build a new nine-tower, five-channel radio network in 10 months.
It never happened.
Instead, long delays and rising costs flowed from the deal, which DuPage officials had justified as exempt from competitive bids and hastily signed despite objections from the county's 32 mayors and city managers, the Tribune found.
Officials in charge of the emergency telephone board at the time said no bids were needed because the project was covered by an earlier state master contract for a different radio network Motorola built for the Illinois State Police. But the Tribune's review of records found that state contract did not include much of the infrastructure — such as towers, transmitters and receivers — the county needed to build a network.
The need for a revamped radio network stems from regulations passed after 9/11 that urge emergency responders to use "interoperable" systems — ones that have the capability to communicate with multiple departments.
As DuPage's effort to build such a system became mired in delays, other suburbs considered a wider array of options. While most of the county's emergency agencies signed on to be covered under DuPage's Motorola deal, Naperville joined with neighboring Aurora in 2009 to build its network.
The two cities accepted bids from radio vendors, with Virginia-based Harris Corp. winning with an offer that was $10 million less than Motorola's. Harris completed the network in January after 18 months.
DuPage, now 62 months into its contract with Motorola, never approached other radio providers.
O'Shea said that after he took over the board two years ago, he immediately determined it was no longer affordable for the county to have Motorola build a new network, which he estimated would cost $58 million.
Instead, the emergency telephone board voted in December 2010 to increase the contract to $28 million so the county could rent space on STARCOM21, the existing Motorola network used by state police.
That work was to be finished by Thursday. A Motorola spokesman declined to detail why it would miss its deadline, citing a company policy against discussing ongoing work for a client.
For his part, DuPage County Board Chairman Dan Cronin said he is taking a closer look at how the emergency telephone board operates.
In July, Democratic Gov. Pat Quinn traveled to DuPage to sign a bill that Cronin, a Republican, had sought to give counties greater oversight of independent boards and commissions, such as the emergency telephone board. Under the new law, county boards will have access to those agencies' budgets, policies and more.
With new access to that information, Cronin has hired an outside firm to search for savings and improvements within those boards, either through action by the county or new legislation in Springfield.
Debut of new DuPage emergency radio network is delayed — again
Five-plus years into county contract with Motorola, first responders still using antiquated system
We've upgraded our reader commenting system. Learn more about the new features.
Los Angeles Times welcomes civil dialogue about our stories; you must register with the site to participate. We filter comments for language and adherence to our Terms of Service, but not for factual accuracy. By commenting, you agree to these legal terms. Please flag inappropriate comments.
Having technical problems? Check here for guidance.