He's thought enough about his future to buy a retirement condo close to the gorgeous California beach that clears his mind.
- In retirement planning, tidy assumptions may not apply
- Taking the ego out of investing in hedge funds
- Consumers hit roadblocks under bankruptcy law
- New IRA rule provides tax break for donations
- The savings game
- The Leckey file
- Getting started
- Spending smart
- Can they do that?
- Taking stock
- Automakers' stocks head in different directions
- The week ahead
"I don't know beans about this," he said.
Although he's a financial analyst for an industrial company in Chicago, he knows he's not aware of all the elements he must consider as he attempts to gaze into his financial future. And he's skeptical of some of the popular advice that comes from brokers, because he knows they could have a vested interest in getting him to save and invest more than he'll need.
So when he recently read that financial planners suggest that people should remove no more than 4 percent to 5 percent of their savings a year to pay for living expenses in retirement, he thought it was way too conservative an approach.
"Assuming that the invested funds average a consistent 5 percent return, your savings would not only keep from running out; they would not go down at all," he said. "So why not remove more?"
It's a question that often trips up smart, conscientious people, said Jack VanDerhei a fellow at the Employee Benefit Research Institute research group.
The problem, VanDerhei said, is that as people eye their retirement savings they make tidy assumptions about the future that won't necessarily apply.
In particular, they focus too much on the present. They could live 30 years or longer in retirement. They figure their living expenses will stay the same as today even though inflation will erode the buying power of their nest eggs. They rely on average investment returns instead of the possibility that a bad break in the markets could undermine the growth of their money--or even lead them to run out prematurely. And they forget that health-care costs are rising faster than inflation, and that retirees often spend periods in nursing homes after illnesses or injuries.
"If you plan to take 5 percent out of your money year after year in retirement, and the second year you end up in a nursing home, all bets are off," VanDerhei said.
People can insulate themselves from the nursing home costs by buying long-term-care insurance, VanDerhei said, but the cost needs to be figured into retirement spending.
Ron Gebhardtsbauer, a senior fellow at the American Academy of Actuaries, said people may live longer than they think. "People buy life insurance in their 20s and 30s to cover their families in case they die," he said. "Yet, the probability [of death at those ages] is only 1 percent."
When people consider the risk of longevity, however, they severely underestimate the effects, he said. "There's a 50 percent probability they are going to live beyond 85," he said.
That's why deciding to take a certain amount of money out of savings each year can have serious consequences. For example, consider the 65-year-old retiree with about $800,200 in savings, who decides to take $59,125 out of his nest egg the first year of retirement, and then boost the amount 2.5 percent a year to cover inflation. Even if the person earned 6 percent every year on the money remaining in investments, he would deplete his nest egg by age 83.
If there is no pension, he would have to rely on Social Security. But the average retiree has been receiving just over $1,000 a month in Social Security. On average, it replaces about 40 percent of the pay during their working years, but upper-middle-income people might receive only about 20 percent.
Financial planners say people need to try to replace at least 70 percent of their final income in retirement.
Realizing that Social Security alone falls far short of the money people need, Medina, Ohio, financial adviser Charles Farrell has calculated that people should have saved at least 12 times their last salary by retirement. Then, he said, they can remove 5 percent each year, adjust the withdrawal up each year to cover inflation, and be fairly certain the money will last for 30 years.
To get there, Farrell suggests people save 12 percent of their pay each year starting at age 30.