General Assembly approves town assistance plan
HARTFORD, Conn. (AP) - State legislators took a $300 million bite out of the state's budget deficit Monday night by passing a mid-year mitigation plan, but it won't be enough to mop up all of Connecticut's growing pool of red ink.
Legislative leaders warned that deeper state budget cuts are on the horizon.
"I anticipate that this is not the end of this," said Senate President Donald E. Williams Jr., D-Brooklyn. "This is the beginning. This is the first step."
Monday's plan - based mostly on a proposal offered last month by Republican Gov. M. Jodi Rell - was expected to leave the approximate $18 billion budget for the current fiscal year $250 million or more in deficit. Also, the package does not touch the estimated $6 billion revenue gap over the next two fiscal years.
"Deficit estimates have grown. There's no doubt about that," said Rep. Denise Merrill, D-Mansfield, co-chairman of the Appropriations Committee and the next House majority leader.
Rell said she was disappointed that lawmakers didn't do more to address the growing deficit problem.
"Much more than tinkering around the edges will be required in the weeks and months to come," she said in a written statement. "Far more rigor - and far more backbone - will be required if we are to truly serve the best interests of the people of Connecticut."
Lawmakers passed two bills aimed at addressing the state's financial crisis. One covered $300 million of the budget deficit with an additional $157 million in federal Medicaid funds, a new tax amnesty program for delinquent state taxpayers and nearly $72 million in spending cuts and delays.
It passed the House of Representatives, 141-1, and the Senate, 34-0. The second bill, which passed in the Senate on a 31-3 vote and the House 141-0, is aimed at helping struggling cities and towns.
It would allow municipalities to join forces and make group purchases through the state's Department of Administrative Services to save money. It also would establish one-time local tax amnesty programs, and provide protections for tenants living in foreclosed properties.
Some Republicans, the minority party in the legislature, said lawmakers should be doing more to address the state's worsening fiscal situation.
"We're going to leave here and people are going to say tomorrow, 'Oh you did something,' and I'm not quite sure if we did anything but put it off until another day," said Rep. Craig Miner, R-Litchfield, who cast the lone vote against the legislation. "We're bleeding financially in the state of Connecticut and we're handing out Band-Aids."
House and Senate Republicans tried unsuccessfully to make further spending changes. There were failed efforts to pass an early retirement incentive program to reduce the state's workforce, and divert some funding from the state's new public financing program for election campaigns.
There were also amendments to reduce the number of legislative workers hired for the session, increase health insurance premiums for lawmakers, and to consolidate special commissions for women, children and minority groups, and increase Rell's ability to cut even more spending. But each one failed.
Merrill said although some of the GOP's ideas might be good ones, it was better to wait for Rell's two-year budget to be presented in February and then hold public hearings on major spending changes, such as agency consolidations.
"We want to hear from the public, what do they think are the priorities of our state," said House Majority Leader Christopher Donovan, a Meriden Democrat who will become House speaker next year.
Democratic leaders decided not to include Rell's proposal to take control of the unclaimed 5-cent deposits for returnable bottles and cans. The money, estimated at $28 million annually, currently goes to the beverage distributors.
The bill instead requires distributors to deposit the money in a separate interest-bearing account. They will have to file a report by March 15, indicating how much money has been collected.
We've upgraded our reader commenting system. Learn more about the new features.
Los Angeles Times welcomes civil dialogue about our stories; you must register with the site to participate. We filter comments for language and adherence to our Terms of Service, but not for factual accuracy. By commenting, you agree to these legal terms. Please flag inappropriate comments.
Having technical problems? Check here for guidance.