White House considers capital gains tax break that would benefit wealthy
The White House is developing a plan to cut taxes by indexing capital gains to inflation, according to people familiar with the matter, in a move that would largely benefit the wealthy and may be done in a way that bypasses Congress.
Consensus is growing among White House officials to advance the proposal soon, the people said, to ensure the benefit takes effect before President Trump faces reelection in 2020.
Revamping capital gains taxes through a rule or executive order likely would face legal challenges, a concern that reportedly prompted the George H.W. Bush administration to drop a similar plan.
A White House spokesman didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Indexing capital gains would slash tax bills for investors when selling assets such as stock or real estate by adjusting the original purchase price so no tax is paid on appreciation tied to inflation.
Most of the benefits would go to high-income households, with the top 1% receiving 86% of the benefit, according to estimates in 2018 by the Penn Wharton Budget Model. The policy could reduce tax revenue by $102 billion over a decade, the model found.
The change in capital gains tax calculation would have little chance of passing Congress, which is why the White House is considering making the change on its own. The House would likely oppose legislation to make the change, as many Democrats have raised objections to the GOP’s 2017 tax cuts, saying they disproportionately helped the wealthy.
The work is largely taking place at the White House because the Treasury Department has been slow-walking the process over concerns that the change could be challenged on legal grounds and that it might require Congress to rewrite the law, the people said.
But Trump has told confidants recently that he remains deeply invested in making the change, they said. Trump last year said in an interview with Bloomberg News that he was considering indexing capital gains to inflation.
Officials inside the White House remain split over whether Trump should attempt to push it through via executive order and risk a legal challenge.
Treasury Secretary Steven T. Mnuchin said last year that he was studying whether the administration could sidestep Congress and issue a rule to allow capital gains to be indexed to inflation.
A Treasury Department spokesman declined to comment.
The White House hasn’t asked the Justice Department for a formal legal opinion on the matter, the people familiar with the matter said.
The George H.W. Bush White House reportedly dropped its capital gains plan amid disagreement among senior officials over whether it was legal.
The change has been a longtime goal of Trump’s top economic advisor, Larry Kudlow, who has said the policy would spur job creation and economic growth because people wouldn’t be taxed on what he’s called “phantom income.”
“It would be a giant economic stimulus for the economy,” said Stephen Moore, a former Trump campaign advisor and a contributor to FreedomWorks, a Washington-based conservative advocacy group. “It would help the stock market and it could unleash hundreds of billions of dollars of new capital for investment.”
Moore dismissed criticism that the capital gains changes would amount to a tax cut for the wealthy, saying a majority of Americans own stock.
The inflation adjustment would amount to a tax cut of several percentage points for investors, depending on the type of asset and how long it’s held, according to 2018 estimates from the nonpartisan Congressional Research Service.
Corporate stock with dividends held for 10 years currently would be subject to an effective tax rate of 24.3%. That same holding indexed to inflation would be subject to a 21.4% tax rate, the research service said.
Mohsin writes for Bloomberg. With assistance from Bloomberg writers Shannon Pettypiece and Laura Davison.
Your guide to our new economic reality.
Get our free business newsletter for insights and tips for getting by.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.