Advertisement

So much winning. Can Bonta maintain California’s legal hot streak against Trump?

A man behind a microphone.
California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta has led much of the day-to-day legal fight against the Trump administration.
(Damian Dovarganes / Associated Press)
0:00 0:00

This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.

See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred

  • California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta has won multiple lawsuits against President Trump, protecting over $160 billion in funding.
  • A federal judge blocked Trump from using California National Guard troops to invade Portland, Ore., in the latest court victory.

It was late Sunday evening when President Trump got thumped with a court loss — again — by California.

No, a federal judge ruled, Trump cannot command the California National Guard to invade Portland, Ore. At the request of California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta and others, U.S. District Judge Karin Immergut broadened a temporary restraining order that had blocked Oregon’s National Guard from being used by the federal government. It now includes not just California’s troops but troops from any state. At least for the next two weeks.

It’s the kind of legal loss Trump should be used to it by now, especially when it comes to the Golden State. Since Trump 2.0 hit the White House this year with Project 2025 folded up in his back pocket, the state of California has sued the administration 42 times, literally about once a week.

Advertisement

While many of those cases are still pending, California is racking up a series of wins that restored more than $160 billion in funding and at least slowed down (and in some cases stopped) the steamrolling of civil rights on issues including birthright citizenship and immigration policy.

“We have won in 80% of the cases,” Bonta told me. “Whether it be a preliminary injunction or a temporary restraining order, and more and more now permanent final injunctions after the whole trial court case is done.”

President Trump offered a carrot-or-stick deal to USC and eight other colleges. On first glance, it may not sound that bad to some. But it is the end of the kind of education that seeks to bend the arc toward justice and equity. Newsom is right to oppose it.

I’ll take it. We all need some positive news. I don’t often write just about the good, but in these strange days, it’s helpful to have a reminder that the fight is always worth having when it comes to protecting our rights. And, despite the partisan Supreme Court, the reason that we are still holding on to democracy is because the system still works, albeit like a ’78 Chevy with the doors rusting off.

While Gov. Gavin Newsom has made himself the face of California’s fights against Trump, taking on a pugnacious and audacious attitude especially on social media, the day-in, day-out slugging in those battles is often done by Bonta and his team in courtrooms across the country.

It’s hard to recall, but months ago, Newsom called a special session of the Legislature to give Bonta a $25-million allowance to defend not just California but democracy. And in a moment when many of us fear that checks and balances promised in the Constitution have turned out to be little more than happy delusions, Bonta has a message: The courts are (mostly) holding and California’s lawyers aren’t just fighting, they’re winning.

“We can do things that governors can’t do,” Bonta said. “No role and no moment has been more important than this one.”

Advertisement

Bonta told me that he often hears that Trump is disregarding the courts, so “what’s the point of litigation at all? What’s the point of a court order at all? He’s just going to ignore them.”

But, he said, the administration has been following judges’ rulings — so far. While there have been instances, especially around deportations, that knock on the door of lawlessness, at least for California, Trump is “following all of our court orders,” Bonta said.

“We’re making a difference,” he said.

A few days ago, the U.S. Department of Education was forced to send out a final chunk of funds it had attempted to withhold from schools. Bonta, in a multistate lawsuit, successfully protected that money, which schools need this year to help migrant children and English learners, train teachers, buy new technology and pay for before- and after-school programs, among other uses.

That’s a permanent, final ruling — no appeals.

Another recent win saw California land a permanent injunction against the feds when it comes to stopping their payments for costs associated with state energy projects. That a win both for the climate and consumers, who benefit when we make energy more efficiently.

Last week, Bonta won another permanent injunction, blocking the Trump administration’s effort to tie grants related to homeland security to compliance with his immigration policies. Safety shouldn’t be tied to deportations, especially in California, where our immigrants are overwhelmingly law-abiding community members.

Those are just a few of Bonta’s victories. Of course, Trump and his minions aren’t happy about them. Stephen Miller, the shame of Santa Monica, seems to have especially lost his marbles over the National Guard ruling. On social media, Miller seems to be attacking the justice system, and attorneys general such as Bonta.

Advertisement

“There is a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism in this country,” Miller wrote. “It is well organized and funded. And it is shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general. The only remedy is to use legitimate state power to dismantle terrorism and terror networks.”

Never mind that the Oregon judge who issued the National Guard ruling is a Trump appointee.

Miller’s rhetoric comes amid a federal crackdown on Portland, Ore., where he says the president has unchecked authority to protect federal lives and property.

“Their goal, I think, is to chill and pause and worry judges; to chill and pause and worry the press; to chill and pause and worry attorneys general who stand up for the rule of law and for democracy, who go to court and fight for what’s right and fight for the law,” Bonta said.

Bonta expects the administration, far from learning any lessons or harboring self-reflection during this mad dash toward autocracy, to continue full speed ahead.

“We’re going to see more, and we’re going to see it fast, and we’re going to see it escalate,” he said. “None of that is good, including putting military in American cities or, you know, Trump treating them like his royal guard instead of the National Guard.”

Even when the Trump administration loses, “they always have this like second move and maybe a third, where they are always trying to advance their agenda, even when they’ve been blocked by a court, even when they’ve been told that they’re acting unlawfully or unconstitutionally,” he said.

Advertisement

On Monday, Trump threatened to use the Insurrection Act to circumvent the court’s ruling on the National Guard, a massive escalation of his effort to militarize American cities.

But California remains on a winning streak, much to Trump’s dismay.

It’s my bet that as long as our judges continue to honor the rule of law, that streak will hold.

Insights

L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.

Viewpoint
This article generally aligns with a Center Left point of view. Learn more about this AI-generated analysis

Perspectives

The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.

Ideas expressed in the piece

  • California’s aggressive litigation strategy against the Trump administration represents a successful defense of democracy and constitutional rights, with the state achieving an impressive 80% win rate across 42 lawsuits filed since Trump took office in 2025
  • The legal victories have resulted in tangible benefits for Californians, including the restoration of over $160 billion in federal funding that would have been cut, protecting essential services like education, healthcare, and infrastructure programs
  • Attorney General Rob Bonta and his legal team deserve recognition for their day-to-day courtroom work that often goes unnoticed while Governor Newsom receives media attention, demonstrating that the judicial system still functions as an effective check on executive power
  • Recent permanent injunctions blocking Trump administration policies on education funding, energy projects, and homeland security grants prove that sustained legal challenges can produce lasting protections for state interests and vulnerable populations
  • The Trump administration has been complying with court orders despite rhetoric suggesting otherwise, indicating that the rule of law continues to constrain federal overreach and that litigation remains an effective tool for resistance
  • California’s $25 million investment in legal defense represents money well spent given the massive return on investment, with every dollar spent in litigation recovering thousands in protected federal funding
  • The legal fight is worth having even in challenging times, as it provides hope and demonstrates that democratic institutions can still protect citizens’ rights when properly utilized

Different views on the topic

  • Trump administration officials view California’s litigation strategy as part of “a large and growing movement of leftwing terrorism” that is “well organized and funded” and “shielded by far-left Democrat judges, prosecutors and attorneys general,” according to Stephen Miller’s characterization of the legal challenges[1][2]
  • The administration argues that legitimate federal executive power is being undermined by activist judges and partisan attorneys general who use the courts to obstruct lawful policy implementation rather than respect federal authority
  • Critics suggest that California’s approach represents an escalation of federal-state conflict that threatens to undermine the proper functioning of government, with the Trump administration prepared to use tools like the Insurrection Act to circumvent judicial interference when necessary
  • Some view the pattern of legal challenges as politically motivated obstruction designed to advance partisan goals rather than genuine constitutional concerns, particularly given California’s consistent opposition to Trump policies regardless of their legal merit

Sign up for Essential California

The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.

Advertisement