Advertisement

L.A. moves to delay $30-an-hour minimum wage for hotel, airport workers tied to 2028 Olympics

Rachel Brashier, left, is an aide to Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, right.
Rachel Brashier, left, an aide to Los Angeles City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, right, listens to public comment as dozens of cooks, room attendants, dishwashers, airport workers and others pack the chambers for a May 2025 vote on the Olympics wages.
(Allen J. Schaben / Los Angeles Times)
0:00 0:00

This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.

  • The move to delay implementation came after airline and hotel businesses gathered enough signatures to qualify a measure for the Nov. 3 ballot that would repeal the city’s gross receipts tax, which would cost the city about $860 million annually in lost revenue.
  • Hotel and airport workers opposed the move, saying they were counting on the raise. Council members said they would continue to negotiate a compromise.

The Los Angeles City Council on Wednesday moved to potentially delay a contentious $30 hourly minimum wage for hotel and airport workers, saying the action may be needed to stave off a business-backed ballot initiative to eliminate the city’s gross receipts tax.

In a 9-6 vote, the council gave initial approval of an ordinance to postpone implementation of the $30 hourly minimum until 2030, instead of 2028. But L.A. City Council President Marqueece Harris-Dawson, who introduced the motion, called it “a placeholder” that allows negotiations among city officials, hotel and airport businesses and labor unions to continue in the coming days. Another vote would be needed to formally delay implementation.

Harris-Dawson said the council would revisit the discussion Tuesday.

“I want to assure every member of this council and every member of the public that the labor movement has come to the table in good faith and has moved a lot. The business community has been at the table from the beginning and moved some,” Harris-Dawson said.

Advertisement

The move came after a coalition of airline and hotel businesses gathered enough signatures to qualify a measure for the Nov. 3 ballot that would repeal the city’s gross receipts tax, if approved by voters. That would strip about $740 million from the city’s general fund — which pays for police officers, firefighters and other services — in the first year alone. Over five years, it would cost an average of $860 million annually.

The council voted to certify the measure for the ballot, but backers of the measure — including Delta Airlines, United Airlines and hotel trade groups, have indicated they will abandon the campaign if the council halts or delays the $30 hourly minimum.

Labor groups that have pushed for the $30 minimum wage said it would be unlikely that voters would ever approve eliminating the business tax.

Advertisement

But Matthew Szabo, the city administrative officer, said the consequences of L.A. potentially losing its second-largest revenue stream would prompt it to immediately declare a fiscal emergency.

“Thousands of layoffs would be required. That’s not a question, that’s a certainty,” Szabo said at the Wednesday meeting. “The city would be forced to implement austerity measures far worse than seen during the Great Recession or the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Szabo recommended fiscal planning on reductions to staff in the event that the measure is approved. He said job cuts that would ensue would then “debilitate” the city’s homelessness response, force the city to cut some 2,000 police officers and put its Olympics preparations “in severe jeopardy.”

“I’m recommending and I’m insisting that we take actions now,” Szabo said. “We need to do that work ahead of time.”

Hospitality union Unite Here Local 11 called the leveraging of the business tax repeal measure a “corporate shakedown” and “unethical scheme” in a letter Monday to the city attorney’s office.

David Huerta, president of SEIU-United Service Workers West, which represents airport workers, said at Wednesday’s meeting that the union had engaged in negotiations in the last 72 hours to reach an agreement, but that they had failed thus far. He said business groups had moved to “hold hostage this city and these workers.”

Advertisement

Rosanna Maietta, president and chief executive of the American Hotel and Lodging Assn., however, has said relief from higher labor costs is much-needed in an industry that has struggled to bounce back from the pandemic shutdowns.

She has described the business tax repeal effort as “a turning point,” with the business community having “refused to be passive” after “years of being targeted by policy decisions that threaten [the] industry’s viability.”

The vote signifies the latest push by the group to slow or halt wage increases for tourism workers in the city, increases that hospitality and service worker unions have pushed for to coincide with the 2028 Olympics.

The American Hotel and Lodging Assn. had previously sought to repeal the $30 per hour minimum wage through a ballot measure, but in September failed to secure enough signatures to qualify amid allegations that petition circulators made false or misleading statements to gather voter support.

Dozens of airport and hotel workers lined up outside City Hall on Wednesday morning to enter the meeting room. Many described during the public comment period shock and dismay at city leaders considering taking back wage increases that were already a done deal.

Debra Lewis, a server who has worked at LAX for more than 40 years and whose husband also works at the airport, said she has co-workers on the brink of homelessness and that the council “shouldn’t make it harder for them.”

Advertisement

“At a time when gas prices are outrageous ... you want to eliminate our raise? Shame on any council member that would support this proposal,” Lewis said.

Erick Cruz, an employee at Concord Collective, which operates several dining locations at LAX, said his family depended on the wage increases that were already underway as part of the previously approved timeline.

“Please do not lower our wages. My daughter is counting on this,” Cruz said.

Councilmembers Eunisses Hernandez, Ysabel Jurado, Nithya Raman, Hugo Soto-Martinez, Curren Price and Katy Yaroslavsky voted against the motion.

Hernandez said approval of the motion sends a “terrible message that corporate pressure matters more than workers’ lives” and that workers “should not be pushed deeper into poverty while corporations profit off the global spotlight” of the Olympics.

Maria Cortes of the Hotel Erwin in Venice Beach, meanwhile, said council members should “recognize the financial realities” family-owned hotels face. She said the hotel’s rooftop bar and kitchen faced growing competition from nearby restaurants that were not subject to the same increased wage requirements as establishments within hotels. Hotels operate on thin margins, she said, and higher labor costs “can lead to difficult decisions such as reducing hours, cutting services or closing restaurant operations altogether.”

Nella McOsker, president and chief executive of the Central City Assn., said downtown businesses represented by her organization were not seeing room bookings and other economic activity they would need to be able to support a steep rise in labor costs.

Advertisement

“I see hotels empty, hotels closing,” she said. “We need to balance challenges the tourism industry faces.”

Times staff writer David Zahniser contributed to this report.

Sign up for Essential California

The most important California stories and recommendations in your inbox every morning.

Advertisement
Advertisement