Advertisement

Despite it all, the World Cup rocks

Photographs of soccer stars Lionel Messi, Memo Ochoa, and Cristiano Ronaldo are shown along with the world cup trophy.
Clockwise from top left: soccer stars Cristiano Ronaldo, Memo Ochoa and Lionel Messi are featured.
(Photo Illustration by Diana Ramirez / De Los; Photos By Photo by Logan Riely/Getty Images,Marco Ugarte, AP, Peter Morrison/AP.)

See more from the L.A. Times in Google Search. Set us as preferred

I giddily jumped up and down and high-fived strangers at a pub as Mexican forward Julián Quiñones scored a goal in the ninth minute of the World Cup’s opening match. I sat with bated breath during Mexico’s free kicks. I once again felt the rush of community and adrenaline when Raúl Jiménez added on another goal for Mexico in the 67th minute.

Here we are again. Every four years I swear I’m not going to get invested in the World Cup hubbub and yet here I am — all in, 10 toes down in my ardent love for the beautiful game’s world stage.

Delusions fill my brain. World Cup fantasies override my everyday duties. Intrusive thoughts come to mind like, “Maybe it’s better if my beloved and woefully doomed Mexico national team gets the second seed in their group?”

Advertisement

If English footie fans can foolishly find it in themselves to believe that “Football’s coming home,” why can’t this Mexican Angeleno muster up the insanity to believe Mexico can take it all as co-hosts of this year’s tournament?

Fútbol fever has set in. All I can do is ride it out for the next five weeks.

But before there was excitement emanating from my being, I was loud about my criticisms of this tournament.

In a previous edition of this newsletter, I called on other countries to boycott the World Cup due to the racist and authoritarian antics of the Trump administration, highlighted by the inhumane Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids that took place over the last year. The reportedly unsafe conditions that migrants face while in ICE detention add another layer of despicability.

Advertisement

Let’s not forget, FIFA has been accused of being a a corrupt organization that buddies up to authoritarians.

To try to protect their colleagues from immigration actions, workers, at L.A.’s World Cup site threatened to strike and made some big gains.

United Here Local 11 union workers at SoFi Stadium in Inglewood — a large portion of which are Latinos — won a new contract that secured pay wages, good security, the ability to block any agency from sharing workers’ personal information and the right for union members to walk off the job without prejudice if they feel threatened by the presence of Department of Homeland Security or ICE officials at the venue.

FIFA has said it’s partnering with the governments of the U.S., Canada and Mexico, the three countries in which the 39-day tournament will be played, “to enhance safety and security of all workers, staff, team members, vendors, journalists, volunteers, and spectators by mitigating potential insider threats. ... Such name checks do not constitute pre-employment checks.”

Trump officials claimed that ICE officials won’t perform raids at World Cup events — time will tell whether that’s true.

Advocates throughout Mexico have accused their government of “sportswashing,” as concerned citizens brought attention to the legions of disappeared individuals due to organized crime. Protesters also have gathered in the nation’s capital to demand safer, more equitable conditions for educators.

Advertisement

On top of the sportswashing behavior, FIFA has been accused of pulling a fast one on all the host cities financially. According to Smith College economic professor emeritus Andrew Zimbalist, who has consulted in Latin America through the United Nations and for several sports associations, FIFA nets all the tournament’s ticket revenue while host cities have to hope that tourism in their municipalities boosts local economies.

“I think it’s fair to say that none of [the cities] will benefit economically from [the World Cup] because they don’t get the revenue, but they get the costs, which can run well over $100 million,” Zimablist said in a recent interview.

But hypocrisy runs deep within me because I’m going to take in every moment of soccer that I can during this sporting event. I have accepted it only because I’ve also seen the joy and excitement it also brings.

As a lifelong yearner, that unbridled sense of hope is intoxicating. I think that’s why so many people are drawn to the energy of the tournament, regardless of their previous attachment to the sport.

Gathering to support your home country or your ancestors’ country or just a country that you feel some strange sense of fondness for and becoming part of a larger cause feels good.

For some, the World Cup brings about memories of touching moments with family and friends. I know plenty of father-son pairings that don’t know how to speak with each other about anything substantial, but when they gather to watch the tournament, a level of understanding and connection happens between them.

Advertisement

The magic of football perhaps.

The games also provide an opportunity for children of immigrants to connect with their roots and proudly tout their ancestry. That feels like an especially radical act, given the fear that has penetrated immigrant communities — especially the Latino population — over the last year in the U.S.

I wore a Mexico jersey today for the first time in years and didn’t feel any sense of anxiety. It didn’t feel like a crime to be Latino today. It felt like a badge of honor. Latino joy filled the bar where I watched the Mexico game. No fear, just vibes.

My sentiments may best be encapsulated by the words of Nico Aviña, the owner of L.A. apparel shop Espacio 1839, who recently spoke with my colleague Andrea Flores about the mixed emotions that many face when engaging with the World Cup.

“[The venue’s recent soccer-centered celebration was about] reclaiming the sport again, reminding folks that the essence of the game belongs to the people,” Aviña said. “With everything that’s going on with the World Cup, everybody’s giving FIFA credit, but I think that we need to reclaim that power. This is a people’s sport and it belongs to us.”

Two red roses coming out of a blue manilla folder
(Jackie Rivera / For The Times; Martina Ibáñez-Baldor / Los Angeles Times)

Check out The Times’ stellar World Cup coverage

Edson Alvarez illustration
Edson Alvarez illustration
(Ezgi Arslan / For The Times)
Advertisement

My colleagues have put together an awesome World Cup package to get Angelenos primed for the big tournament.

Eduard Cauich wrote a wide-ranging profile on Mexico captain Edson Álvarez that touched on criticisms the defensive midfielder has faced from the media and how he’s dealt with political noise that has preceded the tournament’s kickoff.

Andrea Flores covered how different Southern California clothing designers are putting their own spin on World Cup apparel, mixing tradition with personal flare.

Jad El Reda talked with Mexican goalkeeper legend Memo Ochoa about becoming one of only a handful of players to ever participate in six different World Cup tournaments and the legacy he’s left behind. El Reda also wrote an extensive piece about some of the fan festivals that will take place across L.A. County.

Kevin Baxter profiled team U.S. captain Christian Pulisic about the pressure of playing on the world’s biggest stage with home-field advantage. Baxter also talked with members of the 1994 U.S. men’s team about their experience being World Cup hosts 32 years ago.

Stories we read this week that we think you should read

Unless otherwise noted, stories below were published by the Los Angeles Times.

Politics and immigration

Advertisement

World Cup Coverage

Arts & Entertainment

Southern California

Insights

L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.

Viewpoint
This article generally aligns with a Left point of view. Learn more about this AI-generated analysis

Perspectives

The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.

Ideas expressed in the piece

  • The article argues that despite the author’s initial objections to the World Cup due to concerns about the Trump administration’s immigration policies and ICE raids, they became swept up in the excitement of Mexico’s 2-0 victory over South Africa, highlighting how the tournament’s communal joy overrides political criticisms for many fans[1][2].
  • The piece suggests FIFA’s partnership with host governments enables “sportswashing,” pointing to Mexico’s struggles with disappeared individuals and underfunded education while noting FIFA retains all ticket revenue despite host cities bearing substantial financial costs, with experts predicting no economic benefit for municipalities[2].
  • The column contends that while union negotiations at U.S. venues secured protections against immigration enforcement sharing personal data, promises that ICE won’t conduct raids at World Cup events remain unverified, creating tension between celebrating cultural identity and acknowledging systemic concerns[2].
  • The author maintains that the tournament’s power lies in its ability to foster Latino joy and intergenerational connection, describing how wearing a Mexico jersey felt like “a badge of honor” rather than a source of anxiety, while quoting local business owners who argue the sport’s essence belongs to the people rather than FIFA[2].

Different views on the topic

  • Contemporary sports coverage emphasizes Mexico’s historic breakthrough in the tournament opener, noting how the team ended a decades-long winless streak in World Cup opening matches with their 2-0 victory over South Africa, framing this achievement as a standalone sporting milestone worth celebrating[2].
  • Media reports highlight the tournament’s unifying power through athletic accomplishments, detailing how South Korea similarly overcame challenges to win their opener 2-1 against Czechia, with commentators focusing on team resilience rather than political contexts surrounding the event[1].
  • Fan reactions documented across social platforms demonstrate widespread enthusiasm for the World Cup’s cultural significance, with supporters sharing exuberant responses to Julián Quiñones’ opening goal and celebrating the tournament as a natural space for national pride without engaging political critiques[3][4].
  • Sports analysts underscore the immediate emotional impact of the matches, describing how Mexico’s long-awaited opening-day victory generated palpable excitement among fans while characterizing the tournament as breaking curses and creating new narratives for participating nations[2].

The Latinx experience chronicled

Get the Latinx Files newsletter for stories that capture the multitudes within our communities.

Advertisement