Advertisement

Letters to the Editor: City Council shouldn’t have blocked the demolition of Marilyn Monroe’s house

On the left, a photo of Marilyn Monroe in a pink dress. On the right, a photo of a white house with a pool.
Two Brentwood homeowners are suing the city of L.A. and Mayor Karen Bass for the right to demolish the Spanish Colonial-style home where Marilyn Monroe died in 1962.
(Sunset Boulevard / Corbis / Getty Images, left; Anne Cusack / Los Angeles Times)
0:00 0:00

This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.

To the editor: The City Council should reverse its decision that declared Marilyn Monroe’s house a historical cultural monument (“L.A. stopped a couple from demolishing Marilyn Monroe’s home. Now, they’re suing,” Feb. 3).

Sometimes, the public interest in a private property outweighs the rights of the property owner. That is not the case with this house.

The owners are right when they claim in their lawsuit that there is no “actual benefit to the public.”

Advertisement

Monroe was and is loved. And she briefly lived at the house before dying there. But these are not good reasons to justify why the house is a benefit to the public, or why it should be protected at the cost of the loss of rights of the owners.

Nathan Brown, La Crescenta

..

To the editor: Good for plaintiffs Brinah Milstein and Roy Bank.

It is so easy for Marilyn Monroe fans to get what they want on someone else’s dime. If they want to preserve Monroe’s home, they should buy it.

David Fink, Los Angeles

Advertisement
Advertisement