Advertisement

Column: Politics races to the bottom: vulgarities, double standards, oh, and that extra long tie

Now-deposed White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci blows a kiss after answering questions during the press briefing in Washington on July 21.
Now-deposed White House communications director Anthony Scaramucci blows a kiss after answering questions during the press briefing in Washington on July 21.
(Pablo Martinez Monsivais / Associated Press)

A friend of mine who attended the Conservative Political Action Conference this year — I skipped it — reported to me that the Young Republican men were “wearing their ties down past their [crotches].”

I cleaned up the quote a bit for the benefit of a family newspaper.

Though I’m not sure why I should bother when a White House communications director has helped so many staid institutions expand their horizons. As my National Review colleague Kyle Smith noted, the New York Times has a long history of insisting that vulgarities do not meet the definition of news fit to print. For instance, it is the Times’ standard practice to render a colloquialism for speaking gross untruths that combines the male of the bovine species with the fully processed product of what it consumes as a “barnyard epithet.”

But in the wake of just-deposed White House Communications Director Anthony Scaramucci’s profanity-laced, on-the-record tirade with a New Yorker reporter, the Grey Lady went blue. It printed, sans bowdlerization, words and phrases that surely would have been just as relevant to its coverage of President Lyndon Johnson, to say nothing of Bill Clinton.

Advertisement

There’s fierce competition to be as vulgar as possible or to be as vigorous as possible in defending presidential vulgarity.

My point here is not to criticize the Times’ double standards (there will be plenty of opportunities down the road for that). It’s to note that politics or, more accurately, power, has a funny way of changing standards.

Which brings me back to those ties. I’ve been around young conservatives since I was one myself. And it’s always interesting to see how fashion changes. When the first President Bush was in office, blue blazers were a kind of unofficial uniform for young men eager to mimic what then-Bush aide Tory Clarke called “the C-SPAN-and-galoshes” crowd surrounding the president.

When the second Bush was in office, the cowboy boot retailers near Young America’s Foundation chapters must have seen a huge increase in sales.

Advertisement

And now, because the president of the United States wears abnormally long power ties — presumably to hide his girth — one sees more and more twentysomething men sporting the new cravat codpiece.

This is not a phenomenon unique to conservatives. While it’s an urban legend that JFK’s alleged refusal to wear a fedora to his inaugural killed the hat industry, countless young liberals with political ambitions tried to replicate the way Kennedy talked. When Franklin Roosevelt was a kid, he ostentatiously mimicked his distant cousin, Teddy, wearing those pince-nez glasses and shouting “bully!”

So about those barnyard epithets. It’s hard to miss how so many rank-and-file Republicans relish the president’s crude taunts and insults. Nor is it easy to overlook the fact that the president seemed perfectly comfortable with Scaramucci speaking like a “Sopranos” character.

Not long ago, it fell to conservatives such as Bill Bennett, Ralph Reed, Tony Perkins or Mike Huckabee to denounce vulgarity wherever they saw it. And while these men don’t publicly condone Trump’s language they essentially roll their eyes at anyone who makes much of a fuss. And among the rank and file on Twitter and Facebook etc., there’s fierce competition to be as vulgar as possible or to be as vigorous as possible in defending presidential vulgarity.

Advertisement

Of course, the president is not only changing standards — he’s the product of them. Over the last decade or so, a whole cottage industry of young anti-left sensationalists has embraced the romantic slogan Épater la bourgeoisie! Their crudeness isn’t a bug, it’s a feature.

The rising vulgar tide is typically justified either by the need to seem authentic or as genuflection to the sacred right to fight political correctness. Never mind that not everything that is politically incorrect is therefore correct. (William F. Buckley was not P.C., but he had the best manners of anyone I ever met.)

And the competition to seem verbally authentic has spilled over the ideological retaining wall. The Democratic National Committee sells a T-shirt that reads “Democrats Give a S*** About People.” Several leading Democrats have started dropping F-bombs and other phrases, seemingly as a way to prove their populist street cred.

Advertisement

I guess we’ll know this race to the bottom is over when socialist hero Sen. Bernie Sanders starts wearing his ties past his fly.

jgoldberg@latimescolumnists.com

Follow the Opinion section on Twitter @latimesopinion or Facebook

More from Opinion:

Advertisement

Trump is still giving Putin the benefit of the doubt — and it’s weakening U.S. policy on Russia

Here’s how Trump could sabotage Obamacare

Don’t delay regulations for electronic cigarettes


Advertisement
Advertisement