- Share via
A few years ago I came across a profoundly unnerving historical photo: A lineup of terrified, naked Black babies cowered over the title “Alligator Bait.” As it turned out, the idea of Black babies being used as alligator bait was a beloved trope dating back to the antebellum South, though it didn’t really take off until after the Civil War.
The image I saw was created in 1897, just one year after Plessy vs. Ferguson established “separate but equal” as the foundational doublespeak of segregation. With formerly enslaved people striking out and settling their own homesteads, the prevailing stereotypes deployed to justify violence against Black people were forced to evolve. We were no longer simple and primitive, in desperate need of the civilizing stewardship of white Christian slave owners. After emancipation, we became dangerous, lazy and worthless.
Worth less, in fact, than the chickens more commonly used to bait alligators.
White Floridians in particular so fell in love with the concept of alligators hungry for Black babies that it birthed an entire industry. Visitors to the Sunshine State could purchase souvenir postcards featuring illustrations of googly-eyed alligators chasing crying Black children. There was a popular brand of licorice called “Little African,” with packaging that featured a cartoon alligator tugging playfully at a Black infant’s rag diaper. The tagline read: “A Dainty Morsel.” Anglers could buy fishing lures molded in the shape of a Black baby protruding from an alligator’s mouth. You get the idea.
Four decades after the crime, I finally laid eyes on the man who murdered my oldest sister, Vickie Belk.
When I first learned of all this, naturally, I was unmoored. I was also surprised that I’d never heard of the alligator bait slur. Why doesn’t it sit alongside the minstrel, the mammy and the golliwog in our cultural memory of racist archetypes? Did it cross some unspoken line with the vulgarity of its violence? Perhaps this particular dog whistle was a tad too audible?
Or was it the plausible deniability? Did people (including historians) wave it away because babies were never “really” used as alligator bait? It’s true that beyond the cultural ephemera — which includes songs (such as the ragtime tune “Mammy’s Little Alligator Bait”) and mechanical alligator toys that swallow Black babies whole, over and over again — there are apparently no surviving records of Black babies sacrificed in this way. No autopsy reports, no court records proving that anyone was apprehended and convicted of said crime.
But of course, why would there be?
The thing I found so unnerving about the alligator bait phenomenon wasn’t its literal veracity. There’s no question human beings are capable of that and far worse. Without a doubt, “civilized” people could find satisfaction — or comfort, or justice, or opportunity — in the violent slaughter of babies. Donald Trump’s recently posted AI clip “Trump Gaza,” which suggests the real world annihilation of Palestinians will give way to luxury beachfront resorts, is a shining example. The thing that haunted me about alligator bait was the glee with which the idea was embraced. It was funny. Cute. Harmless. Can’t you take a joke?
To quash the teaching of racism, books by Black writers are being banned. As a “hate the book, hate the writer” ethos takes hold, we’ve become targets.
Now here we are, 100 years after “Mammy’s Little Alligator Bait,” and the bigots are once again using cartoon alligators to meme-ify racial violence, this time against immigrants. Just like the title “Alligator Bait,” the Florida detention center name “Alligator Alcatraz” serves multiple ends: It provokes sadistic yuks. It mocks. It threatens. But most crucially, it dehumanizes. “Alligator Bait” suggests that Black people are worthless. By evoking the country’s most infamous prison, “Alligator Alcatraz” frames the conversation as one about keeping Americans safe. It suggests the people imprisoned there are not vulnerable and defenseless men and women; anyone sent to “Alligator Alcatraz” must be a criminal of the worst sort. Unworthy of basic human rights. Fully deserving of every indignity inflicted upon them.
“Alligator Alcatraz” cloaks cruelty in bureaucratic euphemism. It’s doublespeak, masking an agenda to galvanize a bloodthirsty base and make state violence sound reasonable, even necessary. It has nothing to do with keeping Americans safe. Oft-cited studies from Stanford, the Libertarian Cato Institute, the New York Times and others have shown conclusively that immigrants, those here legally and illegally, are significantly less likely to commit violent crimes than their U.S.-born neighbors.
If those behind “Alligator Alcatraz” cared at all about keeping Americans safe, they wouldn’t have just pushed a budget bill that obliterates our access to healthcare, environmental protection and food safety. If they actually cherished the rule of law, they would not deny immigrants their constitutionally guaranteed right to due process. If they were truly concerned about crime, there wouldn’t be a felon in the White House.
A series of myths keep white America from owning up about race, bias and ourselves.
As souvenir shops and Etsy stores flood with “Alligator Alcatraz” merch, it’s worth noting that none of it is played for horror. Like the cutesy alligator bait merchandise before it, these aren’t monster-movie creatures with blazing eyes and razor-sharp, blood-dripping teeth. The “Alligator Alcatraz” storefront is cartoon gators slyly winking at us from under red baseball caps: It’s just a joke, and you’re in on it.
And it’s exactly this cheeky, palatable, available-in-child-sizes commodification that exposes the true horror for those it targets: There will be no empathy, no change of heart, no seeing of the light. Dear immigrants of America: Your pain is our amusement.
The thing I keep wondering is, would this cheekiness even be possible if everyone knew the alligator bait history, the nastiness of which was buried so deep that “Gator bait” chants echoed through the University of Florida stadium until 2020? Would they still chuckle if they saw the century-old postcards circulated by people who “just didn’t know any better”? My cynical side says: Yeah, probably. But my strategic side reminds me: If history truly didn’t matter, it wouldn’t be continuously minimized, rewritten, whitewashed.
You have to believe in the possibility of a just America in order to feel betrayed by the unjust one.
There’s truth in the old idiom: Knowledge is power. Anyone trying to keep knowledge from you, whether by banning books, gutting classrooms, denying identities or burying facts, is only trying to disempower you. That’s why history, as painful as it often is, matters.
Remembering the horror of alligator bait isn’t about dwelling on the grotesque. It’s about recognizing how cruelty gets coded into culture. “Alligator Alcatraz” is proof that alligator bait never went away. It didn’t evolve or get slicker. It’s the same old, tired cruelty, rebranded and aimed at a new target.
The goal is exactly the same: to manufacture consent for suffering and ensure the most vulnerable among us know where they stand — as props, as bait, as punchlines. And no joke is more vulgar than one mocking the pain of your neighbors, whether they were born in this country or not.
Ezra Claytan Daniels is a screenwriter and graphic novelist whose upcoming horror graphic novel, “Mama Came Callin’,” confronts the legacy of the alligator bait trope.
Insights
L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.
Viewpoint
Perspectives
The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.
Ideas expressed in the piece
- Draws historical parallels between the 19th-century “alligator bait” trope and modern misuse of “Alligator Alcatraz,” framing the detention center as part of a legacy of racialized dehumanization.
- Argues the facility’s name and branding normalize cruelty against immigrants, invoking Alcatraz’s draconian reputation to justify denying detainees basic rights like due process.
- Highlights systemic hypocrisy in policies prioritizing deportations over public safety, noting studies show immigrants commit fewer violent crimes than U.S.-born citizens.
- Criticizes the commercialization of the facility’s name into merchandise, comparing it to historical commodification of racist imagery that trivialized violence against Black communities.
- Emphasizes the need to confront buried histories of white supremacist violence to recognize how cruelty persists through coded language and institutional practices.
Different views on the topic
- Florida officials and ICE defend Alligator Alcatraz as a necessary tool for accelerating deportation operations, citing its strategic location in the Everglades and cooperation with federal authorities[1][3].
- Practicality over public criticism: Authorities argue the facility efficiently centralizes deportation logistics, enabling faster removal of detainees via a dedicated runway for federal aircraft[1][3].
- Federal legal support: The Justice Department has taken steps to prevent construction delays, underscoring bipartisan cooperation in enforcing immigration enforcement[4].
- Ambiguity on conditions: While detainees allege inhumane treatment, Florida officials have not directly addressed these claims, focusing instead on operational objectives like increasing deportation rates[2].
More From the Los Angeles Times
Podcasts
It turns out you can burn down a neighborhood and not destroy a community. We’ve seen evidence of this all across L.A. and so we will head back to one neighborhood that’s a good example of that bond: West Poppyfields Drive in Altadena.
Today we discuss one of the pivotal events of the 1960s: the assassination of Robert F. Kennedy. Though the gunman was caught at the scene, confessed at trial, and even bragged about the shooting, his motives have largely been forgotten.
Modern LA earned its first smoggy nickname 450 years ago, as the “bay of smokes.” At the La Brea tar pits, we take a short walk through a long history with curator Regan Dunn, who explains how and why the first Angelenos would have set fires that filled the broad bowl of LA and foretold the curse of smog.
