Advertisement
Elana Rabinowitz

The lost art of prank-calling strangers

A teen girl talks on the phone as her friend sits nearby.
Gen X and millennials spent many after-school hours flipping through the phone book and randomly dialing neighbors.
(Marco Di Lauro / Getty Images)
0:00 0:00

This is read by an automated voice. Please report any issues or inconsistencies here.

Do you remember what it was like to be bored — like really bored? As a Gen Xer, I didn’t grow up scrolling social media or playing endless hours of “Minecraft” to keep me busy; instead, I spent a fair amount of my free time after school crafting the perfect prank call. Armed with an oversized White or Yellow Pages, a rotary phone and a close friend or two, we’d go from name to name, business to business raining terror on neighbors. In retrospect, it was time well spent.

Well, maybe. Some shenanigans may have gone too far. Friends ordered a few too many pizzas to a stranger’s house, or imposed endless verbal harassment on an overstressed father. It was a simpler time. Personally, my level of telephone mayhem never reached those heights of cruelty, but the endless hours of making or receiving prank calls in those pre-internet days became my coming-of-age story.

This way to pass the time actually dates back to the 1880s, just a few years after the phone was invented, and started with an undertaker, of all people, getting called to fetch the dead body of a not-so-dead woman. I guess once people had access to a phone, their true natures were revealed.

Advertisement

Around the same time, Bell Telephone hired teenage boys to work as switchboard operators — an obvious recipe for disaster. Sure enough, the boys began to connect and disconnect people’s calls simply for their own amusement. There’s just something about being a kid and having a telephone and a little bit of power.

It seems unimaginable now to get together with a friend and spend an afternoon calling people just to put on funny voices or shout one-liners and hang up. As I think back on it with distance and some level of maturity, I realize the absurdity of it all. But I imagine these precious moments were not based on malice — it was just a way to entertain ourselves until dinner.

Prank calls forced you to learn how to improvise. While one friend may have had an idea of a canned joke or line they wanted to try, in the end, you had to ad lib what was said depending on who answered — and you had to be prepared for anything. Although most of the time it was a corny joke — “is your refrigerator running?” is a classic — something about the idea of an oblivious adult paging “Dick Hertz” could induce a belly laugh so intense, it actually hurt.

Once I reached puberty, the majority of our prank calls were spent dialing up the boys we liked (or the girls we didn’t). I was careful not to call too often, but the idea that from the confines of my doll-house-decorated bedroom, sitting on my princess canopy bed, I could maybe, just maybe, hear the breath of my teenage obsession filled me with glee. Unfortunately, this was rarely the case; most times, their parents would answer and I would hang up loudly and quickly.

Another genre altogether was the crank call, a more nefarious and in some cases illegal form of mayhem me and my besties concocted. These were the early scripts and hijinks of comedians. In a way, it was to us what TikTok is to Gen Alpha — the opportunity to put on a sultry voice or mimic an old woman depending on the audience. Like anything, our pranks revolved around the zeitgeist of the time. What started with a desperate call to the town undertaker evolved into teens spending hours dialing 867-5309 and asking for “Jenny,” in accordance with the popular ’80s song — an unfortunate coincidence for anyone who had the number.

Today, our handheld devices can tell us the names of just about anyone calling, or let us know if “Scam Likely” is on the other end. People block unwanted numbers, and no one under 30 has heard of the White Pages. Pranks have turned into memes and other visual online jokes that barely involve active communication. No Grubhub driver is showing up with a dozen pizzas that aren’t paid for. The jig is up. And maybe that’s OK. Teenagers have new ways to socialize now.

Advertisement

But man, I sure do miss the innocence of the prank calls and the friends I made while we inundated the town with our juvenile assaults. The way my voice would change when someone answered, and the endless laughter. That all stopped once the dreaded *69 was invented, and with just three buttons people could discover who was on the other end of the line.

Armed with cellphones and endless devices now, we can instantly distract or entertain ourselves for hours on end. And in some ways, that’s sad. Those moments with little to do forced us latchkey kids to express ourselves, even if we were shy. I’d go so far as to say that for many professional entertainers, it was an informal first audition — memorizing lines, becoming someone else, learning how to come up with a retort on the spot. It wasn’t about getting punked or embarrassing someone — not entirely, at least — but about being with your friends, killing time and doing something that got your adrenaline pumping, if only for a few seconds.

The whole point was a bunch of kids setting out on a verbal expedition to use the telephone as a megaphone to have our voices heard. And that we did — better than starting a podcast.

Elana Rabinowitz is an ESL teacher and a freelance writer. Her work has appeared in the New York Times, the Washington Post, CNN and elsewhere.

Insights

L.A. Times Insights delivers AI-generated analysis on Voices content to offer all points of view. Insights does not appear on any news articles.

Perspectives

The following AI-generated content is powered by Perplexity. The Los Angeles Times editorial staff does not create or edit the content.

Ideas expressed in the piece

  • The author reflects fondly on prank-calling as a formative coming-of-age experience for Gen Xers, describing it as a time-honored practice dating back to the 1880s when telephone operators themselves engaged in such behavior to amuse themselves.

  • Prank-calling served as a creative outlet that forced young people to think on their feet, improvise dialogue, and adapt their approach based on who answered the phone, skills that the author suggests were valuable for self-expression and entertainment.

  • The activity functioned as an informal bonding experience among friends and, in the author’s view, represented an early form of performance training for those who later became professional entertainers, similar to how TikTok serves as a creative platform for Gen Alpha.

  • The author acknowledges that while some pranks crossed ethical lines—such as ordering unwanted pizzas to strangers or harassing individuals—the intent for most participants was rooted in innocent fun rather than genuine malice, serving primarily as a way to pass unstructured time with friends.

  • The disappearance of prank-calling due to modern technology like caller ID reflects a broader loss of unstructured play time for young people and represents a shift from active verbal communication to passive consumption and visual-based entertainment like memes.

Different views on the topic

  • The phenomenon of pranks and hoaxes can be manipulative and reflect problematic attitudes toward those targeted, as demonstrated when someone fabricated slang terms and deliberately fed false information to a major newspaper, with the publication’s editor responding that the deception was “irritating” despite the tongue-in-cheek nature.[1]

  • Online harassment behaviors, which evolved from earlier forms of pranking, have been linked by psychologists to deindividuation—where anonymity leads to disinhibition and a lack of self-regulation—and such behavior has been weaponized as part of recruitment strategies that exploit social vulnerabilities.[2]

  • While the author frames prank-calling as generally harmless fun, the article itself references instances where such behavior escalated into genuine harassment, such as “endless verbal harassment on an overstressed father,” suggesting the line between entertainment and cruelty was often blurred and the impact on targets was not always benign.

A cure for the common opinion

Get thought-provoking perspectives with our weekly newsletter.

By continuing, you agree to our Terms of Service and our Privacy Policy.

Advertisement