Former U.N. Ambassador John R. Bolton bashes Obama on Libya
Reporting from Sacramento -- John R. Bolton, the former ambassador to the United Nations who is weighing a presidential run in 2012, accused President Obama on Friday of failing to address threats to U.S. national security and called the administration’s approach to the crisis in Libya “pathetic.”
Hours after the president warned that the United Nations was ready to launch a military strike to defend the Libyan people if their leader Moammar Kadafi did not halt his attacks on civilians and pull back from the rebel stronghold of Benghazi and three other cities, Bolton cast the president as indecisive, inconsistent and uninterested in foreign policy.
Speaking on the opening night of the state Republican Party convention in Sacramento, Bolton told fellow party members that had he been in charge, he would have moved far more swiftly and would have unilaterally declared a no-fly zone in Libya during the early stage of the crisis.
“Had we acted in those early days, we could have tipped the balance conclusively against Kadafi and this whole thing might be over,” Bolton told hundreds of delegates over dinner in the ballroom of a downtown hotel. “Instead the president dithered, and he watched, and he waited, and he temporized.”
“In the course of his ruminations, he said Kadafi has got to go — and then he still didn’t do anything about it — thus exposing the United States to an enormous credibility problem with our friends and allies, as well as our adversaries.”
In recent days, the United States and its allies at the United Nations have ratcheted up pressure on Kadafi to leave power. The U.N. Security Council agreed Thursday to use “all necessary measures” to protect the Libyan people, clearing the way for military strikes on Libyan aircraft and ground forces. The vote was 10 to 0 with five abstentions from Germany, China, Russia, India and Brazil.
“This is the great diplomatic successor to the Bush administration? Are you kidding me?” Bolton scoffed to laughter Friday night. In addition to his tenure as U.N. ambassador during George W. Bush’s second term, Bolton also served as undersecretary of state for arms control and international security in Bush’s first term,
In a broad-ranging and well-received critique of Obama’s foreign policy, Bolton said Obama was “still not qualified to be president” two years into his term. He suggested that the president had underestimated the threats in North Korea and Iran and “doesn’t see the rest of the world as terribly threatening to American interests,” while placing his faith in international institutions to provide security for the United States.
“He is our first post-American president,” Bolton said, adding that he didn’t mean “un-American” or “anti-American.” “He’s kind of beyond all that patriotism stuff. He’s got a much broader view of what our policy should be.”
“We don’t need a president who looks out for the interests of the rest of the world over ours,” he said later in his speech, to applause. “We need a president who is proud of America, who will defend American interests.”
The former ambassador, who has never run for office, told reporters earlier on Friday that he had no timeline for deciding whether he would enter the 2012 presidential contest: “I’m not like the duck, you know, placid on the surface, but paddling furiously underneath,” he said. “I’m thinking about it.”
But he said he was considering the prospect in part because of his concern that economic issues have eclipsed national security issues in the political debate.
“Obviously we’ve got appropriate and enormous attention to domestic policy and the revival of the U.S. economy, but the president and the administration have to be able to walk and chew gum at the same time,” Bolton said.
“The inadequacy of our debate on national security issues is going to come back to haunt us,” he said. The 2012 Republican nominee, he said, “has to be prepared on some evening in October to debate President Obama on national security issues and they better be ready for it.”
Get our Essential Politics newsletter
The latest news, analysis and insights from our politics teams from Sacramento to D.C.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.