Valedictorian equation doesn’t quite add up I...
Valedictorian equation doesn’t quite add up
I read with great interest your article about Burbank High School
graduate Richard Huh.
I strongly support Richard’s efforts to expose the inherent
unfairness in the unknown, but obviously flawed, process by which a
“chosen few” administrators in the Burbank Unified School District
pick the valedictorian. I spoke with Dr. Alexis Sheehy, the assistant
superintendent, at length after seeing that my daughter was not on
the “list of potential valedictorians.”
My daughter had a 4.75 GPA and was ranked fifth in the class
before adding to her transcript two college courses she took at Cal
State Los Angeles last summer. The district refuses to weigh those
classes like they do advanced-placement classes, even though they are
the same level as AP classes, and even though the colleges do give
weight to college classes taken during high school, whether the
district will admit that or not. Thus, her grade-point average and
rank were lowered, which, we believe, knocked her out of the running
for valedictorian.
Even the principal, Leslee De Roos, was not privy to the equation
used to come up with the list or the choice of valedictorian when I
asked her about it earlier in the year after seeing the changes in my
daughter’s transcript. How can students strive for something as
important as valedictorian (and believe me, it is very important to
this particular group of students) if they don’t even know what to do
to qualify? For Ms. Quayle to say the process is fair is
disingenuous. Her defensive attitude is typical of most of the
administration and office personnel at Burbank High School, with the
exception of a very few people, like former principal Leslee De Roos
for one.
My daughter, like Richard, received the Regent’s and Chancellor’s
Scholarship from UC Berkeley -- their highest merit award -- and will
enter college with Richard in August. I have absolutely no doubt that
they will both go on to be great successes. But please continue to
try to help shed some light on and expose the cabal at Burbank who
perform their arcane formulations in secret, refuse to discuss what
the valedictorian criteria are, and arbitrarily limit their list of
“potentials” to 10 students, leaving other, fully qualified students
dissatisfied, dejected, disappointed and confused.
Leslie H. Strunk
Burbank
After they approved it, they didn’t approve it
After the good citizens of Burbank approved a 2% increase in the
transient-parking tax, City Council -- in all of its wisdom -- did
not approve it. Didn’t they put it on the ballot? What kind of logic
was that?
An easy $300,000 was denied to the city’s general fund by a
diffident City Council. These opportunities didn’t come by too often.
I think the Republican problem of being implacable against new
state taxes at the state level is contagious. It’s spread to the city
of Burbank in regard to the parking tax increase. Any tax can be
temporary. Let’s have some foresight and use what tools we have
available.
When the council changes its mind and enacts at least a temporary
parking tax, why don’t they contact the Republicans in the state
legislature and show them the efficacy of that move?
Wesley Greene
Burbank