Copyright © 2019, Los Angeles Times | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy

No one has a ‘right’ to a cellular phone

Let’s get one thing perfectly clear: John Burroughs High School

students use their cell phones a lot, yes, but most of the time, they

aren’t talking to their parents.

Such student-to-parent communication is what countless JBHS


students would like the public and the Burbank Unified School

District board to believe the phones are for, because it cloaks the

students’ on-campus cell phone use in the dual guises of parental

concern and student safety. And who wants to quibble with those?


But any casual visitor to the campus -- not to mention the

teachers and administrators who have to deal with the nuisance all

day -- will tell you that most of those cell-phone conversations are

friends chatting with friends about who-knows-what. While there’s

nothing wrong with that, they don’t need to be doing it during class

time, or making themselves late to class because they need to finish

some oh-so-important call.

And it emphatically does NOT necessitate a change to JBHS’


cell-phone policy, which if anything should be toughened or --

ideally -- thrown out altogether in favor of a policy that keeps the

phones out of students’ hands and in a safe place until the school

day is over.

Way back when -- 10 years ago, say -- this wouldn’t have been an

issue, because cellular phones were clunky, expensive things with

dicey reception. Students didn’t carry them around. Most adults

didn’t, either. Yet somehow we all muddled along, calling each other


from home, using a pay phone or -- Heaven forbid -- speaking to one

another in person.

Now, though, you can buy a flip phone that also records and sends

pictures and text messages, displays and sends e-mail, and surfs the

Internet, all from the palm of your hand. And with that improved

technology comes a wrongheaded sense of entitlement: We should be

able to employ this technology whenever and wherever we want,

circumstances notwithstanding, because we can.

In fact, it goes beyond that: More than being able to use our

phones whenever and wherever we wish, we think we have a right to use

them. In the case of JBHS, that sense of entitlement has students

arguing that a more restrictive cell-phone policy would -- get this

-- violate their 1st Amendment free-speech protections.

Putting aside the uncomfortable, not to mention surreal, image of

the Constitution’s framers mulling advances in cellular-phone

technology 200 years hence, this free-speech argument is simply

ridiculous. No one’s trying to stop students from talking. They’re

trying to stop them from creating a nuisance, intruding on

instruction -- which is why they’re at school in the first place --

and wasting time.

At the risk of sounding stuck in the late-1980s, here’s a thought:

If a parent needs to get hold of their child due to an emergency, how

about calling the school office and having a message sent to the

child’s class?

And if it’s not an emergency -- a parent will be late picking up a

student, for example, or a student wants to tell a parent his

after-school plans have changed -- is there some reason a call about

that can’t wait until after the last bell rings and the student has

retrieved his cell phone from its holding place?

Students are at school to go to class and pay attention. That’s

their job until 3 p.m. each day, after which they’re free to jabber

on a phone all they want. Better to have them relinquish their phones

to the administration at the start of each day -- or better yet, not

bring them to school at all -- and go back to the Stone Age

(in-person conversations and messages) in case of emergency.

There’s no such thing as a “right” to a cell-phone conversation,

and JBHS students should remember it.