Advertisement
Share

O.C. district to work toward water-purchase deal with proposed desalination plant

The Poseidon desalination facility in Carlsbad is nearly complete. The company is looking to build a similar plant in Huntington Beach.

The Poseidon desalination facility in Carlsbad is nearly complete. The company is looking to build a similar plant in Huntington Beach.

(Brittany Woolsey, HB Independent)

The Orange County Water District approved a term sheet Thursday with Poseidon Water that the two agencies can use to negotiate the cost of water from Poseidon’s proposed Huntington Beach ocean desalination plant if the district determines it would be worthwhile.

After several hours of public comments, the district board of directors voted 7-3 during a special meeting to approve the document, . which also would be used to figure out which agency would be responsible for various aspects of the project.

The Orange County Water District covers most of northern Orange County, including Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa, Newport Beach, Seal Beach and Irvine.

Poseidon hopes to start construction on the facility in 2016 next to the AES power plant at Newland Street and Pacific Coast Highway, though it first needs a development permit from the California Coastal Commission. Its application may be reviewed late this year.

John Kennedy, the water district’s executive director of engineering and water resources, told directors that approving the term sheet does not legally commit the district to buy water from Poseidon, though “we are committing to fully consider the project and work toward developing a water purchase contract.” The contract would last 50 years.

“It is not a 100% done deal today,” said board member Harry Sidhu, whose sentiment was shared by other members. “It is just a good start in moving forward.”

Kennedy said there is no timetable for the board to vote on a contract to purchase water, though the district hopes to have a proposed agreement by the end of the year.

According to the term sheet, Poseidon would own, finance, construct and operate the plant, which is estimated to cost $1 billion. The water district would purchase the facility after 30 years.

The district would purchase water from the company, as well as own, finance, construct and operate any necessary distribution facilities to send the water to users. The district also would be responsible for finding those users and deciding whether to use water from the plant to recharge groundwater.

Several changes have been made to the term sheet since it was introduced in March. One change enabled the water district to negotiate a tiered fee pegged to the cost of treated water from the Municipal Water District of Orange County.

The Municipal Water District charges $1,003 per acre-foot for treated water. Poseidon could tack on up to 20% of that rate during the first 10 years of the 50-year contract for desalinated water, up to 15% during the second 10-year period, up to 10% in the third and up to 5% in the fourth. No premium would be charged during the last 10 years of the contract.

The initial document would not have allowed a premium lower than the maximum.

The Orange County district currently buys untreated water from the Municipal Water District for about $660 per acre-foot.

Another change requires Poseidon to show that its Carlsbad desalination plant, which is scheduled to open by November, has operated successfully for 90 days before the district will commit to the Huntington Beach facility.

Kennedy said the changes keep most of the risks on Poseidon’s plate and prevent a complicated public-private partnership.

Thursday’s vote also allocated $230,000 for water district staff to analyze four issues associated with the project.

The district will further investigate how the water would be distributed and how much the district would sell to users. It also will try to determine whether there are issues with mixing desalinated water with imported water and groundwater, assess the future reliability of the Municipal Water District as a source and analyze whether Poseidon’s project is financially stable.

Orange County district board members Jan Flory, Philip Anthony and Roger Yoh dissented in the vote on the term sheet, calling it incomplete.

Flory said she could not decide whether purchasing Poseidon’s water is best for the district if there are no alternatives to compare it with. She equated the situation to going to a store to buy a prom dress but only one dress is available.

“I’m going to leave, no matter how pretty the dress is, and that’s what I feel is going on here,” she said. “It may be that, at the end of the day, Poseidon is a great development, but to make a decision on it and move it forward incrementally does a disservice to our ratepayers and to people who are concerned about the environment and all the other issues that revolve around this.”

More than 90 people asked to speak during Thursday’s meeting.

Dozens of union workers and representatives urged board members to approve the project, saying it would create jobs and provide Orange County with a new water source.

State Assembly members Matthew Harper and Travis Allen, both Republicans from Huntington Beach, supported the term sheet via video messages. Former Huntington Beach mayors Joe Carchio, Shirley Dettloff and Vic Leipzig also voiced their support.

Leipzig said that although purchasing desalinated water from Poseidon would be more expensive than buying water imported from the Colorado River, continuing to rely on imported water could further harm the environment.

“The delta at the Colorado River is today a desert vastly larger than the area of Orange County,” he said. “We must move away from imported water.”

But former Huntington Beach Mayor Debbie Cook and other residents of Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, Costa Mesa, Westminster and Garden Grove said dealing with Poseidon is not the best route.

Cook said the district should study allocating its water to cities based on population because “it would incentivize conservation.”

“It would mean that those who could at least afford utility increases would not be saddled with subsidizing the wealthiest, most wasteful residents who are complaining at every opportunity that they need more water,” she said. “We do not need more water. We need politicians and residents of this district who are willing to learn the facts and who have the courage to embrace a change that will serve us all in the long term.”

Ray Hiemstra, associate director of programs for Costa Mesa-based nonprofit Orange County Coastkeeper, said the district also should consider the project’s potential effects on marine life. Critics say the plant could snare animals in its intake system and damage the environment by discharging brine, a highly salty byproduct of the desalination process.

Scott Maloni, vice president of Poseidon Water, said in an email that “the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board issued a permit to the project in 2012 after determining the intake and discharge of seawater by the project would not negatively affect marine life or degrade water quality.”

He noted that the project also has approvals from the city of Huntington Beach and the State Lands Commission.

“These permitting agencies … all approved the project after finding it can be built and operated in full compliance with applicable environmental laws and regulations,” Maloni said.


Advertisement