Letter -- Kathryn M. Upton
I attended the Starbucks hearing and found today’s (April 12) article
to have omitted the reason for the hearing, and other points of interest.
The hearing was held to question Starbucks’ zoning variance, which
allowed it to open with seating for 18, not to change the underlying
zoning that would allow Starbucks to remain with seating for eight. Also,
possible solutions to the problems raised by four (but not all) Burchett
residents were addressed. For instance, slanting the existing parking to
discourage customers from making illegal left turns into the existing
spaces, changing red zone parking on Hahn to green (even 30 minutes
green) to free as many as six to eight spaces, and Starbucks making a
greater effort to remind customers not to litter and to increase its
litter patrol.
Also, there were some positive comments about the nice caliber of
people (all ages) who frequent Starbucks and the sense of community that
results from such a pleasant gathering spot. I testified that I frequent
Starbucks three to five times per week and rarely cannot find a spot to
park, except in the early weekday mornings. Therefore, I believe the
testimony that there is never a place to park is an overstatement.
Someone testified that the issuance of more traffic citations might
“train” people to obey the traffic laws. Why not consider increasing the
fines, as they do in other congested cities, to be more effective in this
regard? Further, on weekend mornings after getting a cup of Starbucks
coffee, I walk down to the park with my dog and do not observe the
traffic, litter, double parking and driveway-blocking alleged to be
“constant.”
It is also important to note that the issue of general increased
traffic and congestion of Glendale is not limited to Burchett, and is, in
part, a function of a 1920s city layout being used in the 21st century. I
lived for 14 years in a Washington, D.C., area that continues to struggle
with 19th-century city layouts in the 21st century, as do many other
cities.
Let’s learn what we can from those who continue to address increasing
populations in cities designed for lesser populations.
KATHRYN M. UPTON
Glendale