Opinions split on stem cells
- Share via
Josh Kleinbaum
One week after California thrust itself into the forefront of a
raging medical and ethical debate by approving Proposition 71,
Glendale’s local lawmakers weighed in on the touchy topic of stem
cell research.
The debate centers on unspecialized cells known as stem cells that
have the ability to develop into different types of specialized human
cells. Embryonic stem cell research uses cells from a developing
human embryo, but extracting the cell destroys the embryo. Adult stem
cell research, as the name suggests, uses cells from adults.
Some supporters of stem cell research believe that embryonic stem
cells can be more successful and have more potential than adult stem
cells. Critics say embryonic stem cell research carries the same
moral dilemma as abortion -- if an embryo is a human life, destroying
the embryo for medical research is tantamount to murder.
Last week, California voters approved Proposition 71, which will
provide $3 billion in state funds for embryonic stem cell research.
“It holds enormous promise for medical breakthroughs that will
save countless lives,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, who represents
Glendale. “It will be done ethically and morally. It has to be done
that way. At the national level, we have done a disservice by
artificially curtailing this vital research. California will once
again be on the cutting edge.”
At the national level, President Bush has cut federal spending on
embryonic stem cell research, a move supported by Rep. David Dreier,
(R-La Crescenta).
“Pursuit of a method to find cures for horrible ailments like
Alzheimer’s, diabetes and cancer is a high priority for all
Americans,” Dreier said. “Now that 71 has passed, I expect the
funding it provides will be closely monitored so that it yields the
most efficient and effective results for the people of California and
the nation.”
Schiff, a Democrat, has pushed embryonic stem cell research in
Congress. In February 2003, Schiff attempted to amend a bill banning
human cloning to include an excep- tion for “therapeutic cloning,”
which would allow doctors to transfer the nucleus of a patient’s cell
into the stem cell. This would ensure that the stem cell would not be
rejected by the patient’s body.
Schiff’s amendment, which failed, met stiff opposition from
pro-life groups, which oppose human cloning.
“It has a great benefit, medically,” Schiff said. “As long as it’s
being done for the purpose of healing, it’s something that must be
allowed. We have to prohibit cloning for purposes of reproduction.”
Some local legislators offered support for the concept of stem
cell research, but expressed concern over its costs to taxpayers.
Assembly Majority Leader Dario Frommer, a Democrat, said he
supports all types of stem cell research, but he does not think that
California is in the financial position to finance the research.
Frommer, who represents Glendale, said the $3-billion bond will cost
the state $6 billion, including interest.
“I’m troubled by Proposition 71, because the state is broke,”
Frommer said. “That initiative, which Gov. [Arnold] Schwarzenegger
supported, puts us another $6 billion in the hole. Right now, we’re
having trouble making our commitments to build roads, schools and
other infra- structure, and I don’t think when the state is in this
type of financial crisis, we should be spending $6 billion on this
type of research.”
State Sen. Jack Scott said he supported biotechnology and
initiatives that help attract the industry to the state. But he added
that the bill for Prop. 71 will be high.
“The only problem is that it’s a very high price tag for the
taxpayer, after the bond is paid off,” Scott said.
Now, success of the measure will include good oversight and
monitoring, Scott said.
“The voters have spoken,” said Scott, a Democrat who represents
Glendale. “We’ll have to go ahead with this ... make sure the money
is wisely spent and that we avoid conflicts of interests, and that it
doesn’t unusually enrich any particular biotech company.”