Official eyes a regional air plan
- Share via
Mark R. Madler
When the first commercial flight in six years took off from Palmdale
late last month, among those present was a county official who saw
the occasion as one that could bring a change in air travel to the
metro Los Angeles area.
“It was a great sight to see,” Los Angeles County Supervisor
Michael Antonovich said. “We had clouds and rain in the community but
it was pure sunshine with that flight.”
If Antonovich had his way, there would be more commercial flights
out of Palmdale to relieve the number of flights and prevent
expansion at Los Angeles International Airport.
Palmdale, operated by the Los Angeles Board of Airport
Commissioners, is primarily used for military aircraft. Palmdale
Airport officials suspended commercial flights there in January 1998.
The airport has a 9,000-square-foot terminal and 17,000 acres of
undeveloped land.
It’s that open space around the Palmdale airport that separates it
from the Bob Hope Airport, where there is little to no room for
expansion. Burbank City Councilman Todd Campbell recognized that open
space provides a buffer zone.
“Burbank is landlocked,” Campbell said. “That airport will remain
a community airport.”
Antonovich agreed, saying that in the region-wide picture Bob Hope
Airport will continue to provide the type of service it is now due to
a lack of building new runways or expanding existing ones.
“In the future, the airport is operating at the capacity it is
now,” Antonovich said. “There are no restrictions at Ontario and
Palmdale.”
Burbank-Glendale-Pasadena Airport Authority President Charlie
Lombardo casts a skeptical eye on the suggestion of regional airport
planning, especially in terms of potentially taking control out of
local hands.
And yet, regional planning would be good if it would take pressure
off of Bob Hope Airport, Lombardo said.
“We are a nice little regional airport,” Lombardo added. “But
someone else deciding your future is not a good thing.”
Still, Antonovich sees a regional air travel plan as a viable
option because the infrastructure around LAX cannot sustain more
passengers and expansion would create more gridlock and pollution.
A 2001 study commissioned by the board of supervisors found that
the Antelope Valley could support an airport and when fully
operational would generate up to $65 million in revenues, Antonovich
said.
“It makes no sense for someone from the Antelope Valley to go to
LAX, just as it makes no sense for someone to go from Inglewood to
Palmdale, to catch a plane,” Antonovich said.