Insurance claims settlement announced
- Share via
Claims processors at the Glendale office of UnumProvident Corp. might
have their hands full after Monday’s historic announcement that could
force the nation’s largest disability insurer to reassess up to
26,000 California claims.
The Tennessee-based corporation, which has about 2.4 million
policyholders in California, agreed to pay an $8-million fine and
reopen up to 26,000 denied claims made since Jan. 1, 1997, said State Insurance Commissioner John Garamendi Monday at two separate press
conferences.
The first news conference was conducted at the Glendale Adventist
Therapy and Wellness Center -- a branch of the hospital in Eagle Rock
-- and the second was in San Francisco.
Eligible policyholders “have the right to have their cases
reassessed by Unum and if they are denied again then a mutually
agreed upon third party will decide” the claim, Garamendi spokesman
Norman Williams said.
UnumProvident provides income protection for policyholders whose
claims are granted during rehabilitation while the policyholder
cannot work.
The $8-million fine goes into the state’s general fund and does
not directly affect any claimants, Williams said.
Irvine attorney Bob Scott, who represents clients who were denied
claims by insurance companies, said UnumProvident’s claim practices
have been suspect since Jan. 1, 1997, shortly after its ownership
changed hands.
Scott praised Garamendi for negotiating the settlement.
Unum “only got bad when they were taken over in 1996 and they
tried to be a different kind of company,” Scott said. “(Garamendi)
was able to level the playing field through use of his authority and
to get them to follow the rules, which have been in force since the
40s.”
Scott said the denial or outright ignoring of certain claims left
his clients without income protection that caused significant
hardships.
Kurt Weissenbach, of Moreno Valley in Riverside County, owned two
tire shops for more than 25 years, but after he injured his back he
filed a claim with UnumProvident in 2003 that is still unsettled,
Scott said.
Because of his shortage of income and no insurance compensation,
Weissenbach, who is in his 50s, was forced to close one of his shops
and will be requesting a reassessment of his case.
He paid premiums for more than 10 years, Scott said.
Scott expects Garamendi to continue reviewing other disability
insurers in the future.
The important thing is Californians have the peace of mind that if
they buy a disability policy and can’t work they will be protected,”
Scott said. “This is big. It is now the new standard.”
UnumProvident paid more than $600 million to California
policyholders in 2004, said Jim Sabourin, vice president of corporate
communications. UnumProvident will send letters notifying the 26,000
eligible policyholders that they can have their cases reassessed. It
is too early to determine how many reassessments the company will
have to perform or how long it will take, he said.
“It was a settlement, definitely,” Sabourin said. “That means both
parties agreed to specific terms and by doing so concludes the market
conduct examination.”
The examination started more than two years ago.
UnumProvident President and Chief Executive Officer Thomas R.
Watjen released a letter Monday to Garamendi in response to the
announcements.
“Our company has undertaken significant change over the last
several years, and we set a very aggressive agenda to both improve
all that we do and put issues of the past behind us,” stated the
letter in part. “With this in mind, although we disagree with much of
the exam report, we felt it was important to eliminate the
uncertainty this ongoing exam creates with customers, employees and
investors by entering into a settlement with the California
Department of Insurance.”
* VINCE LOVATO covers business and politics. He may be reached at
(818) 637-3215 or by e-mail at vince.lovatolatimes.com.