It's called the Data Security and Breach Notification Act of 2015, and, if passed into law, it would be the first federal rule requiring businesses to let consumers know that their personal information may be in the hands of hackers.
Sounds good, right?
Dozens of states, including California, already have similar laws on the books that are stronger and more comprehensive than the proposed federal law. But the federal law would preempt all state laws.
The bill would eliminate existing data-breach protections for pay-TV and Internet customers. Right now, for example, people must be notified if there's any unauthorized access to information on shows or channels watched.
The bill also would require notifications only in instances of financial harm, rather than the broader requirements of many states, such as violations of personal privacy in the form of hacked emails or corporate databases.
"California has some of the strongest laws in the country protecting consumers from identity...Read more
Alex is facing the possibility of a disability leave from work. He's wondering if something like that will stay on his public records.
You can see why Alex or anyone else facing a similar situation would be concerned. In a tight job market, you might not want a future employer to know that you had to take time off in the past.
That, of course, is unfortunate. Though there's plenty of fraud among disability claims, there are also many legitimate claims that shouldn't reflect poorly on a person's work record.
But I suspect most of us would prefer to keep a past disability leave to ourselves if we were looking for a new gig.
The laws for this sort of thing vary from state to state. In California, you're entitled to some privacy.
Initial workers' compensation claims are not public records. Claims become public only when or if they're appealed to the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board.
The California Labor Code prohibits workers' comp records from...Read more
We learned this week that more than 317 million computer viruses or other malicious programs were unleashed by hackers last year, according to the Internet security firm Symantec. That's nearly a million new cyberthreats daily.
But not all attempts at messing with your computer are from sneaky, illegitimate sources. Some are from big-name tech companies that don't seem to care what you think of them.
Anyone whose computer has been hijacked by the Ask.com toolbar knows exactly what I mean.
"It's like a bad houseguest," said West Hollywood resident Gary More, who's been struggling for months to get the software out of his computer. "It will not leave."
If you've avoided this especially pernicious program, count yourself lucky. The Ask.com toolbar typically skulks into people's systems on the coattails of some more desirable software. Often, it's included with updates to the Java programming language.
And then it doesn't go away. Ever.
More, 71, estimates he's already paid about $450 to tech...Read more
Airlines increasingly are missing scheduled takeoffs and landings, losing travelers' bags and overbooking flights, according to a report released Monday.
And the bad news: Things will probably get worse.
Even as the latest performance stats showed that major carriers are having trouble with the most basic functions — i.e. getting you and your luggage from Point A to Point B — the outlook for future travel all but guarantees even less-friendly skies.
Boeing is planning to bring its new short-haul 737 MAX aircraft into service in 2017. It will have 189 seats, compared with the approximately 160 seats that now fill the cabin of the 737-800. Budget carrier Ryanair's version of the new jet will have 200 seats.
For its part, Europe's Airbus will unveil its A320neo next year. It was originally intended to have 180 seats, but the company received permission from the European Aviation Safety Agency last month to cram in 15 more seats, bringing total passenger capacity to 195.
What this means for...Read more
Here in the Land of the Free, the telecom industry has fought aggressively for years to make sure people keep getting hundreds of pay-TV channels they don't want, rather than just the ones they watch.
Up in the Great White North, which would be Canada, telecom companies were told by government regulators the other day that they'll have to unbundle pay-TV packages by next year and switch to a la carte channels.
And guess what? The Canadian telecom industry is basically cool about it.
Brad Shaw, chief executive of Shaw Communications, western Canada's largest cable company, said the new a la carte rules "will give Canadians increased choice, while providing producers, broadcasters and distributors more freedom and flexibility to innovate."
Contrast that with the hand-wringing of U.S. telecom companies, which argue that unbundling pay-TV channels would mark the end of civilization as we know it.
"A la carte would destroy a model that produces the best TV available anywhere in the world,"...Read more
Credit card companies say you can't sue them and you can't join other customers in suing them, and if you don't like it, tough.
Federal regulators finally have reached the obvious conclusion: That's not fair.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has released a study showing that so-called arbitration clauses in credit card service contracts frequently prevent consumers from having a grievance adequately addressed.
"These arbitration clauses restrict consumer relief in disputes with financial companies by limiting class actions that provide millions of dollars in redress each year," said Richard Cordray, director of the watchdog agency.
"Now that our study has been completed, we will consider what next steps are appropriate," he said.
You don't have to be Sherlock Holmes to deduce that he's talking about new rules for the industry.
Arbitration allows businesses and customers to sidestep the court system and have a dispute resolved by an independent arbitrator who listens to what both...Read more