Advertisement

Fear and reporting

Share
Times Staff Writer

It’s midnight and closing time at the Al Hamra hotel’s poolside restaurant, a fact signaled to the last four stragglers by waiters who have turned off the lights.

But the argument isn’t over, so no one leaves the white plastic table piled with empty beer cans, the dregs of a chicken dinner and an overflowing ashtray.

“It would take a four-wheel drive to do it,” insists Kirk Troy, who’s freelancing for Newsday.

Advertisement

Beth Potter, another freelancer, thinks a tank, or at least a high-clearance SUV, would be needed.

“Nonsense,” counters Scott Bobb, the Voice of America guy covering Baghdad at the moment. “You could clear that thing with a Chevy Chevette with a little determination.”

The debate conducted with the boozy cynicism that tends to pervade journalists’ late-night discussions is about how little it would take a car-bomb driver to get over the foot-high concrete barrier the hotel management has laid down 30 feet from the front steps as the centerpiece of its anti-terrorism defenses.

Private security experts employed by American media have warned editors that the Hamra is a vulnerable target for the kinds of attacks carried out in recent weeks against the Jordanian Embassy and the U.N. headquarters in Baghdad and a mosque in the holy city of Najaf.

A few journalists have since left the Hamra, some even moving to the Palestine Hotel -- a more visible venue but one that has the advantage of being well-barricaded with a U.S. armored guard. At the Hamra, most have waved off their editors’ pleas to relocate to some lesser-known place that terrorists are unlikely to think of as an American hangout.

The decision to stay put is born of neither disregard for personal safety nor the knee-jerk tendency of journalists to reject unsolicited advice from faraway bosses. In the gritty, risky world of war reporting, journalists -- or “hacks,” as we affectionately refer to one another -- tend to adopt a survival strategy that gives priority to creature comforts and the company of colleagues over pointless efforts to anticipate the next threat.

Advertisement

Baghdad is a dangerous place, no matter how you approach it. Thinking about all the ways you can get hurt, kidnapped or killed is less likely to make you vigilant than scared out of your wits.

“I don’t want to scare you, but ...” was the opening line of every admonition imparted at a recent American Town Hall meeting organized by the U.S. consul’s office here for nonmilitary citizens. Noting that there are 70-odd carjackings a day in Baghdad and that the road to Jordan is beset by AK-47-wielding thieves, two Army security officers urged unarmed Americans to be ever alert for car bombs, to avoid getting stuck in traffic, to stay out of sight, to sleep in rooms away from the street, to carry a means of communication at all times and to pack survival equipment in the trunks of their cars.

We were told to let our Iraqi drivers start the cars before we get into them, to travel with doors locked and windows up, to change lanes while driving below an overpass so no one could drop a grenade on us and to refrain from doing any sightseeing or unessential travel. We were also encouraged to let our cars get really dirty so anyone who places a bomb underneath would leave a handprint.

For most journalists, that’s too much information.

Those who have covered conflicts in the former Yugoslavia, Chechnya, Somalia, Afghanistan or the West Bank are familiar with a laundry list of potential perils, which, if strictly avoided, would prevent us from doing our jobs.

When Los Angeles Times editors encouraged the three reporters ensconced at the Hamra to relocate, we had identical reactions: Why?

“The only thing that works around here is the Hamra,” Patrick McDonnell said as he finished his chicken fingers. “I don’t want to go hide out in some little hotel no one knows about.”

Advertisement

Sure, the 10-story Hamra, rising from a warren of shops and two-story houses, is an easy target for shoulder-launched rockets from any of the hundreds of rooftop terraces within range. Even with the concrete beams barring vehicle entrance to two sides of the twin-building complex, a car or truck bomb could pull up to within arm’s length of the pool area or the still-exposed northern tower.

“We told the hotel management they had to get their security act together or we were moving out,” Josh Hammer, from Newsweek, says of the ultimatum some journalists gave Hamra’s managers after the Aug. 19 U.N. bombing.

The managers responded by calling in U.S. troops for a security review and laying the two concrete beams at the entrance. In an apparently unrelated move, they repainted the beige exterior red and white, making it all the more eye-catching on the monochromatic horizon.

“Are you staying?” Larry Kaplow from Cox Newspapers asks me each morning when we cross paths on the seventh floor. We have the same conversation daily, acknowledging the feebleness of the security improvements as well as the unpredictability of where terrorists will strike next.

The bottom line is that a smaller hotel, though less visible, would have even less protection and no pool, restaurant or social life after the city’s 11 p.m. curfew. The Hamra is a classic hack hotel, a diverting respite from adversity, much as the Commodore Hotel in Beirut served as an oasis during the civil war in Lebanon and Sarajevo’s Holiday Inn was often a merry refuge throughout 3 1/2 years of bombardment.

Despite the personal security advice being doled out via their employers, journalists tend to rely more on their local staff for guidance. That’s not so much from firm conviction that Iraqis know the danger zones better than the consultants as from a passive belief that you stand out less if, when in Baghdad, you behave as Baghdadis do.

Advertisement

That includes ignoring traffic lights, even when the electricity is on to power them. Our drivers aggressively pursue every opening in the thick traffic snarling key roads and intersections, getting gridlocked in the exhaust fumes and orgy of horn-honking. As you sit eye to eye with hordes of impatient and angry drivers, you finally remember to lock your door.

At the end of our stints in Baghdad, our security focus turns from lodging to leaving: Is it safer to brave 12 hours on the road to Amman, Jordan, where the chances of being robbed at gunpoint are growing to near certainty? Or is it better to take the daily air shuttle for aid workers out of Baghdad airport, which remains officially closed to commercial traffic because of the risk that planes could be shot down by resisters flush with Hussein-era weapons?

“People are getting robbed on the road, but they’re not getting killed,” asserts Ranya Kadri, the Jordanian “fixer” who arranges logistics for dozens of foreign correspondents traveling between Amman and Baghdad. “But the planes are going to be a big prize for the terrorists, and if they shoot one down there will definitely be no survivors.”

That argument holds sway for some hacks. Two veteran L.A. Times correspondents, Alissa Rubin and Chris Kraul, lately spurned the air shuttle option, preferring the perilously deserted stretches of road to the corkscrew takeoffs and landings practiced by pilots conducting evasive actions.

“Did you hear about the latest robbery?” Pam Hess from UPI asked as we waited for a recent news conference to begin. “A 22-car convoy got stopped by three flatbed trucks full of guys with AK-47s. They took computers, cellphones, money, jewelry and made everyone strip down to their underwear.” An ABC and NBC convoy traveling into Baghdad with armed escorts got into a shootout with robbers in late August, an engagement likely to raise the hazard stakes if bandits now fear getting shot at.

A Chicago Tribune reporter headed out of the country also reported back a harrowing experience last month. An armed bandit forced his driver out of the car, drove the captive correspondent to a remote location, took his valuables, then left him, driving off with an accomplice who had followed in another car.

Advertisement

“Good thing he knew how to drive a stick,” understated his colleague, Christine Spolar.

For me, the choice is clear. Being terrified for the 15 or 20 minutes it takes to get airborne and out of rocket range is preferable to being terrified for 12 hours on the road. Inshallah, I’m flying.

Advertisement