American values were born before the United States of America. The act of venturing to a new world, leaving behind the customs and allegiances of the past, created an American mind-set and an American society based on the rights of the individual. By the time of the Declaration of Independence, the truths about which Thomas Jefferson wrote really were self-evident: All men -- all human beings -- are created equal, with the "unalienable" right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. The nation was created to respect, and protect, those truths.
The Constitution set out to create "a more perfect union," a concept that at the time was given to mean a better cooperation among the 13 young states. But "union," over the decades, came to be understood as the forging of an American people and creed out of not merely many states but many people from many lands of origin, cultures and faiths. Perfecting that union meant cutting away its tragic hypocrisies: slavery, racial segregation, subordination of women, inequality before the law. Perfection recedes inexorably beyond reach as the decades bring new challenges, but faith in perfectibility and the process of pursuing it propels America forward and keeps fresh its founding principles.
To begin: We respect candidates who speak plainly about their faith, and we acknowledge the bonds some voters feel toward leaders who profess the same religious beliefs as theirs, but we are wary of candidates who seek favor and power by promising to magnify the presence of religion in American law and life and to engraft religious precepts onto the Constitution. We reject the assertion, made earlier in the campaign by Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), that the Constitution established a Christian nation, and hold instead that it established a nation of laws that protect freedom to adhere to and practice religious faith according to individual conscience. In conflicts between individual liberties and social or religious values -- such as the ability of any two adults to marry even if their union is not sanctioned by religious establishments or self-appointed experts -- we side with the individual.
We seek candidates who can distinguish between eternal values and mere tradition. A 21st century American president should not lead as though it were still the 1800s, and as though the nation had endless lands to exploit and oceans and skies too vast to be harmed by industry. The nation can ill-afford a wistful and self-indulgent descent into frontier-era thinking, and should instead recognize the perfect consistency between careful stewardship of resources and a continued exploration of the frontiers of human ingenuity. The United States must have a president open to science and aware of the planet's limits.
On the issue of new arrivals to this country -- those who enter legally and those who enter or stay without permission -- we acknowledge the clash between our support for new Americans seeking opportunity and our respect for the rule of law. We look for a president with the intelligence and leadership to square law with economic and social reality, giving us laws that protect both our borders and the ability of newcomers to continue the American story. We dismiss anxiety over the fate of our language and culture, knowing that they are not only strong but further strengthened by new blood and new thinking.
We expect a president to be unafraid to explore ways to erase injustice and promote each American's opportunity to learn and to achieve, and to be equally unafraid to end experiments that prove unproductive or that infringe on the liberty of others. We expect a president to be committed to the ongoing project of perfecting the union.
Next: "Life" explores abortion, stem cell research and the death penalty. The complete "American Values" series and an explanation of it can be found at latimes.com/values08 and at the Opinion L.A. blog. Each editorial will be posted upon publication.
AMERICAN VALUES AND THE NEXT PRESIDENT
'A more perfect union'
The first in a series of editorials examining American values and the candidates for president.
We've upgraded our reader commenting system. Learn more about the new features.
Los Angeles Times welcomes civil dialogue about our stories; you must register with the site to participate. We filter comments for language and adherence to our Terms of Service, but not for factual accuracy. By commenting, you agree to these legal terms. Please flag inappropriate comments.
Having technical problems? Check here for guidance.