Advertisement

Ex-Professor, 3 Others Face Terrorism Trial

Share
Times Staff Writer

The four defendants allegedly called themselves “brothers,” members in “the Movement.” Today, federal prosecutors will begin trying to prove to a jury that former professor Sami Al-Arian and three others, using Al-Arian’s state-funded university as cover, were key figures in a Middle Eastern terrorist organization.

Al-Arian, 47, a former computer engineering professor at the University of South Florida, says he is a pro-Palestinian activist and devout Muslim who is being harassed because of his views and faith. U.S. authorities charge that Al-Arian and his co-defendants did much more -- that they promoted and helped finance Palestinian Islamic Jihad, a militant anti-Israel group designated a terrorist organization by the U.S. government.

According to Asst. U.S. Atty. Terry Furr, Al-Arian and other members of an alleged Tampa cell served as a fundraising and communications hub for Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which has been blamed for killing more than 100 people in suicide bombings and other attacks in the Middle East.

Advertisement

Opening statements in the case are scheduled for today. In a preview of the government’s case, Furr last month accused the defendants of being an integral part of a “terror cycle” in which attacks in Israel would be exploited to solicit donations to finance more attacks.

“This is an elitist little group of people, all highly educated, trying to convince people to go kill themselves on their behalf,” Furr told U.S. District Judge James S. Moody Jr., who is presiding over the trial.

Since his arrest Feb. 20, 2003, Al-Arian, a permanent resident alien in the United States since 1989, has been kept mostly in solitary confinement at the Coleman Federal Correction Complex in Sumter County, about 60 miles northeast of Tampa.

The 53-count indictment accuses Al-Arian and eight co-defendants, five of whom are at large or overseas and unavailable for trial, of involvement in a “criminal organization whose members and associates engaged in acts of violence including murder, extortion, money laundering, fraud and misuse of visas, and operated worldwide including in the Middle District of Florida,” which includes Tampa. If convicted, each of the accused could be sentenced to up to life in prison.

None of the defendants is accused of being linked to Al Qaeda, or committing acts of violence in the United States or elsewhere.

Juliette Kayam, a former Justice Department official who is a lecturer in public policy at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, called the Tampa trial an example of “mission creep” in the Bush administration’s prosecution of alleged terrorist offenses.

Advertisement

Former federal prosecutor Dan Richman said it was vital for the United States to attempt to eradicate terrorism organizations even if Americans were not the organizations’ targets.

“It’s critical we not allow our country to be used as a base for raising money and perpetrating terrorist attacks in other countries,” said Richman, who teaches criminal procedure at Fordham Law School in New York.

Three other men were arrested the same day as Al-Arian and are being tried with him: U.S. citizens Ghassan Zayed Ballut, 43, of Tinley Park, Ill., and Hatem Naji Fariz, 32, of Spring Hill, Fla.; and noncitizen Sameeh Hammoudeh, 44, a former student and instructor at the University of South Florida.

The Bush administration has pointed to the indictments as an example of the benefits of the Patriot Act. Among other things, the act made it easier for criminal investigators and intelligence agents in terrorism cases to share information. Congress is considering whether to renew some provisions of the act.

The government’s case against Al-Arian and the others is complex. The indictment -- which includes charges of conspiracy to commit racketeering, conspiracy to kill or maim innocent people outside the United States, providing material support to a terrorist organization, and money laundering -- covers 159 pages.

Prosecutors revised it in September.

“They dropped some counts,” Al-Arian defense co-counsel Linda Moreno said. “They also do not refer to Dr. Al-Arian anymore as the [U.S.] leader of Palestinian Islamic Jihad. We feel that this is significant.”

Advertisement

In an interview Friday, the Tampa lawyer declined to comment on the charges or on the strategy for Al-Arian’s defense.

“We’ll make our opening statements Monday, and I think that what needs to be said will be revealed,” Moreno said.

Since his arrest, Al-Arian has unceasingly proclaimed his innocence. A sympathetic website, freesamialarian.com, calls the Kuwaiti-born son of Palestinian refugees a political prisoner and says the Bush administration is trying to silence him because of his vocal support for Palestinian rights.

Palestinian Islamic Jihad was founded by Palestinian students in Egypt who were influenced by the revolution in Iran in 1979.

According to prosecutors, Islamic Concern Project, a charity founded by Al-Arian, sent money to Palestinian Islamic Jihad, families of suicide bombers and families of Islamic Jihad members imprisoned in Israel.

A Tampa think tank started by Al-Arian also allegedly assisted Palestinian Islamic Jihad, which was designated a terrorist organization and threat to the Middle East peace process by President Clinton in a Jan. 23, 1995, executive order.

Advertisement

The indictment paints a portrait of Al-Arian starkly different from the affable human rights activist depicted by supporters. At an April 1991 meeting in Cleveland, for instance, Al-Arian allegedly called on attendees “to damn the allies of America and Israel to death,” and said Muslims should go to the Holy Land not for tourism but for jihad, or holy war.

In a November 2001 interview with the Los Angeles Times, Al-Arian said his rhetoric had been misunderstood.

“When you say ‘death to Israel,’ you mean death to the system that is oppressing the Palestinian people,” he said.

According to the indictment, some defendants used the University of South Florida to obtain “cover” as faculty members or students.

They also allegedly used academic meetings at the institution as a pretext for inviting other Palestinian Islamic Jihad members and associates to the United States.

Al-Arian’s presence at the Tampa university became an issue in the 2004 Senate campaign, when Republican candidate Mel Martinez accused Betty Castor, the school’s former president and his Democratic challenger, of failing to fire a suspected terrorist. Martinez won.

Advertisement

Ahmed Bedier, director of the Tampa office of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said many of the Tampa Bay area’s estimated 35,000 to 40,000 Muslims were worried that Al-Arian might already be guilty in jurors’ minds not because of what he may have done, but because of who he was.

“In general, it’s hard for a Muslim to get a fair trial in America after 9/11,” Bedier said.

Al-Arian and Fariz had asked Moody to move the trial out of Tampa because the case had received so much pretrial publicity. On May 23, the judge refused, saying the questioning of prospective jurors had resulted in a pool that could give the former professor and the other defendants a fair trial.

Advertisement