In the 15 years since its inception,Gatekeeper, now shorthand for all federal enforcement efforts at the Mexican border, has had a range of consequences, some expected and others grimly surprising. For example, attempted crossings and apprehensions where enforcement is heaviest plummeted, just as officials had hoped. But migrants didn't stay home. Instead, thousands attempted to cross in the dangerous desert lands to the east, in Arizona and Texas -- and as many as 5,600 have died, according to a recent report by the American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego and Imperial Counties and Mexico's National Commission on Human Rights. Illegal immigrants are now 17 times more likely to die while crossing the border than they were in 1998, according to the report.
Anti-illegal-immigrant groups seem unimpressed by these figures. No country can survive, they argue, if it can't control its own borders. The migrants are breaking the law, they say, and those who foolishly risk their lives are to blame for their own actions. But although it's true that personal responsibility plays a role, the fact remains that this is a humanitarian crisis of enormous proportions, and it requires immediate action. The report acknowledges that Mexico has failed to adequately discourage migration through the desert, but it lays most of the responsibility on U.S. policies and calls for a redirection of resources from enforcement to rescue.
That's not likely to happen -- particularly not in the post-9/11 environment. Still, there are steps that can be taken. Borstar, the Border Patrol's excellent search-and-rescue program, should get more resources. Both governments, but particularly Mexico's, must do better at educating would-be migrants about the dangers facing them in the desert, where temperatures can reach 115 degrees and dehydration is almost inevitable. Smuggling too is a binational issue, especially in light of the growing cooperation between drug and human smugglers.
The broader changes that need to take place will only happen with time. Mexico must create the economic conditions for prosperity at home so that its citizens will stop risking their lives to leave. In the meantime, the United States must enact reforms that remove death in the desert from the migration equation.
Digg
Twitter
Facebook
StumbleUpon
For all the angry commentators, let us first remember that every human life is worthwhile. Every single life, the life of a U.S. soldier and the life of an undocumented immigrant is just as priceless. Also it is pointless to mix apples and oranges here because immigrants have nothing to do with our government's decisions to send our young men and women to war. If we are serious about controlling our borders, why do we not close them for good. One long wall from the Pacific to the Golf with enforcement to eliminate any and all gaps will at least prevent people from crossing in the Arizona deserts where they end up dead. This will not be the solution, but will put a lid on how many people die in search of the American dream. As it was mentioned in the opinion piece, the immigrants will stop coming only once genuine job opportunities exist in their home countries and we have to remember that we are at fault in many ways for the economic limitations in Latin America because we appropriate what we think belongs to us and leave behind misery. People, learn your history to understand why Latin America is so poor-it isn't as simple as you think and remember that people's lives are on the line, be compassionate. Your anger will get us nowhere.
Osorio9 (10/29/2009, 11:15 PM )