BLOWBACK

Scientology stands a chance

The vilified church is no stranger than many a long-established religion.
By Jean E. Rosenfeld
February 22, 2008
» Discuss Article    (246 Comments)

Skeptic Michael Shermer exposes hate speech against the Church of Scientology and strangely concludes that its "cult-like secrecy" and "hypocrisy" merit suspicion. He also calls it a "faux religion."

Speaking as a scholar who has analyzed new religions for over 20 years, I deplore critics who pose as experts. Scientology is a new religion, and unlike most, it may become an established religion whether the rest of us like it or not.

All religions have origin myths, and all religions keep secrets from the uninitiated. If a nonbeliever were to tell the origin myth of Christianity, it would sound no less fantastic than the Thetan myth of L. Ron Hubbard: A spirit present as God before the creation of the universe splits off from Godhead after billions of years of Earth time and is born again as a flesh-and-blood person to a Jewish woman. The son gathers adherents, casts out demons from afflicted people, works miracles and finally confronts the evil king in the Jewish capital city. The evil empire's soldiers try, convict and kill him in a public execution. He then is resurrected before his disciples and tells them to spread his kingdom throughout the world. He promises to appear again and save those who believe in his message and condemn to eternal punishment those who do not. All of his followers will be resurrected after our Earth is destroyed by seven years of heaven-sent catastrophes that kill off most of the human race.

Does this tale sound more convincing than Scientology's beliefs?

Myths are symbolic expressions of existential truths; they are not literal accounts of historical events. Their truth — religious truth — is not subject to experimental verification. Religious truth sustains and organizes human societies and gives identity — and thus, sanity — to human beings. Expressing oneself religiously and symbolically is an essential ingredient of being human. Myth will always be with us, whether created by cosmologists, as the Big Bang theory, or by poets and prophets as alternative accounts of world creation.

Cults also exist in every established religion. Cults are subgroups that express worship of a deity in a particular ritual, such as a cult of Mary that prays the rosary, or a cult of temple sacrifice that features a banquet. A cult is not a "faux religion."

Since the shocking deaths of more than 900 people belonging to Jim Jones' People's Temple in 1978 — followed by Aum Shinrikyo's sarin gas attack and the immolation of about 80 Branch Davidians near Waco, Texas, in the 1990s — behavioral scientists, associated with security agencies, have developed cult theory to account for such extremely rare and violent incidents. Unfortunately, cult theory is an oversimplified, one-size-fits-all list of characteristics that would apply to most religions in their infancy and only serves to label a new religion as a potential threat. Cult theory is not based on long-term data about religions, unlike the scholarship on history of religions that should be taught in every American university.

Seldom does a new religious movement survive its founder's death, as Scientology has, and take root during subsequent generations, gain followers and become established as a church. But those movements that do succeed are vilified at the beginning, when they have no advocates and no power. President Buchanan sent the U.S. Army to try to take control of the Mormon colony in Utah; Seventh-day Adventists ("Millerites") were ridiculed for falsely predicting the date of the apocalypse twice; Pentecostals were regarded as devil-worshipers and "holy rollers" because of their ritual encounters with the Holy Spirit. Today all are established mainstream religions.

Scientologists are discriminated against and forbidden to practice in some European nations where freedom of religion is subordinated to the dominance of state churches. Only in the United States are new religions legally free to develop and grow, but they must first endure the gantlet of public hate speech by those with little or no understanding of religion as a dynamic, diverse and intrinsic enterprise.

One need not be a Scientologist — as I emphatically am not — to advocate for Scientologists' 1st Amendment right to believe their myths, practice their rituals and promulgate their message to others. One may be a skeptic — as I am — and still marvel at the creative ways in which human societies attain and maintain a collective identity and sense of meaning.

Let Scientology be. It will stand or fall on its own merits.

Jean E. Rosenfeld is a historian of religions at the UCLA Center for the Study of Religions.




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Will Scientology survive the test of time? Discuss today's Blowback.

Comments will close after two weeks.
 
1. Scientology is so attack oriented it just appears absurd. A debate is not resolved by attack attack attack, it takes well reasoned arguments, not repeated talking points about well rehearsed topics. It's not as though the amazing "same thoughts and words" enter every scientologists head whenever someone brings up operation snow white or Lisa McPherson or now Shawn in Clearwater (Just waiting to see you eventually scapegoat for that blunder, what bad timing.) Obviously you have meetings about "your crimes" to spin room them and do damage control. It is obvious to everyone, no one is fooled.
Submitted by: Shawn L.
1:31 PM PST, Feb 29, 2008
 
2. Anon: Any "group accused of crimes" does not mean they are guilty of those accusations -- does the term "witch hunt" mean anything to you? Especially those accusations made by an anonymous source. BTW, to anyone interested, the "tactics" employed by Scientology, they can be found quite readily in the 'Scientology Handbook" available in most public libraries and, of course, church book stores. Aspects such as controlling a communcation cycle (without causing an upset) or handling an unwarranted personal accusation are outlined in that publication, as well as other equally valuable information.
Submitted by: Mike Morgan
7:38 AM PST, Feb 29, 2008
 
3. Anon.: I have said this many times -- if you have information about crimes being committed, if you have documentable proof of the commission of these crimes, then it is your duty to present this proof to the proper authorities. To not do so, in my mind, would be a breach of ethics. The Vaughn Young article does not amount to much. It seems funny that a purported "ultra-secret" location would give public tours, but that is beside the point -- I guess. Anyone who has to deal with the press employs similar policies. They are called press agents, publicists or PR guys. All employ similar policies - these are nothing new.
Submitted by: Mike Morgan
7:22 AM PST, Feb 29, 2008
 




Op-Ed: The Republicans need a White House candidate with ideas, steadiness and the ability to unify. That's not Alaska's departing governor.


   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
Michael Jackson's memorial -- what would LA taxpayers get for their money?
No. Nonononononononononono. Ab. So. Lute. Ly. No. The city of Los Angeles is a...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
A big week for copyrights and piracy
The sale of The Pirate Bay probably ranks as the week's biggest news for those...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT


ADVERTISEMENT