Gregory Rodriguez

When you con your own

Will Madoff's scheme go down as the affinity fraud of all time?
Gregory Rodriguez
December 22, 2008
» Discuss Article    (5 Comments)

We're obsessed with race and ethnic relations in the U.S., so much so that we tend to believe that most crime, violent or otherwise, is committed across racial, ethnic or religious lines. We make a special category for "hate" crimes. Governments compile statistics on them. Journalists, always looking for the next great divide, eagerly read intergroup conflict into just about any form of antisocial behavior.

To a point it makes sense -- we know that humans are capable of terrible atrocities against the "other." But in other ways, the focus on such crimes leads us to forget that the overwhelming majority of criminal activity is intra-ethnic, not inter-ethnic. The news about the financially ruinous criminal acts confessed by Bernard L. Madoffis a stunning example. Madoff is Jewish, and so are most of his victims. He ran in privileged circles, and so did they. Forget strangers -- Madoff's alleged $50-billion fraud is a good example of the fact that it's people like us who can easily be our biggest enemies.

Consider the data about who does what to whom. From 1976 to 2005, 86% of white murder victims were killed by whites. In that same period, 94% of black victims were murdered by blacks. And victimizers and victims don't just share racial categories, they also tend to know each other. We've all heard the statistic that the majority of victims killed by handguns are murdered by people they knew. Likewise, according to the Department of Justice, three in four women who have been raped and/or physically assaulted since age 18 are victimized by men they either know, dated or were once or currently married to.

Cons, like violence, tend to be intra-ethnic and intra-communal. Between 1998 and 2001, more than 90,000 investors in 28 states lost more than $2.2 billion in what the Securities and Exchange Commission calls "affinity fraud" schemes, in which a member of an affinity group targeted and took his neighbors, friends or co-religionists. Madoff's scheme could take the affinity-fraud cake.

The element of betrayal in any "intra" crime makes it especially devastating. That's because, in these cases, trust -- which is crucial for intimate relationships and society at large -- is destroyed. When we're wronged by the people we've let into our circle -- or worse, the people we've loved -- the heartbreak adds insult to injury.

Only two years ago, the SEC issued a warning about a rising tide of affinity fraud. These scams, it said, "exploit the trust that exists in groups of people who have something in common."

Perpetrators of affinity fraud often succeed by claiming that because they are "just like" their investors, they are in a unique position to help them. They also leverage group pride. One recently indicted scammer said he wanted to create more black millionaires; another said he was "proudly Hispanic." Others can highlight the tensions between their affinity group and others, sometimes accusing outsiders of keeping them out of investment markets.

The government's list of such frauds shows that ethnic groups and churches are especially vulnerable. According to the SEC, in Glendale, an Armenian American took other Armenian Americans for $19 million, and elderly Jehovah's Witnesses and Korean immigrants have also been targeted. Pyramid schemes like the one Madoff said he ran-- where later investors provide the return for those who get in earlier -- are especially common. Indeed, Charles Ponzi, who gave pyramid schemes his name in the 1920s, mostly defrauded his fellow Italian Americans. In part because these crimes do target identifiable groups and shatter the victim's notions regarding the relative trustworthiness of their group members, University of Maryland law professor Lisa M. Fairfax argues that affinity fraud should be added to the roster of hate crimes.

I'm not sure that it makes sense to add to or change that definition -- hate crimes are complicated enough to understand and prosecute. But Fairfax's notion that affinity fraud deserves special notice is worth considering. You might be tempted to say that Madoff only hurt his own, but don't be too smug if you and yours weren't among them. The destruction of the social fabric inherent in Madoff's actions affects us all. When trust is defeated, everyone loses.

grodriguez@latimescolumnists.com




Post Comment

Name
Enter your comments and post to forum
By participating you agree to our Terms of Service and represent that you are not under the age of 13.
 
Discussion


Comments are now closed.
 
1. When my father, a Dublin-born Irishman, was asked if he would vote for John Kennedy, dad followed with a question: "And why should I?" The reply was, "Well he's Irish." To that my father said, "If that's all he's got going for him, God help us." I never learned for whom my father voted because he considered voting to be the most private act a citizen could do. I remain so instructed.
Submitted by: Martin Young
6:45 AM PST, Dec 24, 2008
 
2. While eagerly pointing his finger at various ethnic and religious groups, and how these groups have practiced and been affected by affinity fraud, Rodriguez conspicuously avoids mentioning the Hispanic (specifically Mexican) community. Is it because Hispanics have not suffered from - and have not practiced - affinity fraud? Is it because Rodriguez searched diligently but failed to find anything on the topic? Despite Rodriguez’s professed objectivity, his omission sends a clear signal of there being an undercurrent of schadenfreude in his comments.
Submitted by: Frank
11:14 PM PST, Dec 23, 2008
 
3. Does part of the reason for the success of the fraud lie in the insular nature of the victims and their community? Any socialogists out there?
Submitted by: Freddy
8:49 PM PST, Dec 22, 2008
 




Jonah Goldberg: Citing recently published comments, the columnist wonders whether the justice believes some populations need to be reduced through abortion.


   
The best in Southern California opinion journalism
In today's pages: Schools, Honduras and 'judicial eugenics'
The Times endorses an unusual idea being considered today by the L.A. Unified...
more
The business and culture of our digital lives, from the L.A. Times
Appiphilia: Remixing with Romplr
For all the hype about the "remix culture," I'm skeptical of the notion that the...
more
 

ADVERTISEMENT



ADVERTISEMENT