Advertisement

Suit Aims to Ease Confinement of Egg-Laying Hens

Share via
Times Staff Writer

In an ongoing campaign to unfetter the caged hen, the Humane Society of the United States plans to file a lawsuit in California today challenging a partial sales tax break for agricultural producers who purchase cages that animal welfare activists consider cruel and torturous.

Humane Society officials contend in their suit, a draft of which was obtained by The Times, that the use of so-called “battery” cages to confine egg-laying hens to a floor area smaller than a sheet of 8 1/2 by 11-inch paper violates California’s laws against animal cruelty.

“It’s time for the state to stop subsidizing it,” said Humane Society attorney Jonathan Lovvorn, who was scheduled to file the suit in Superior Court in San Francisco.

Advertisement

Caged hens are the latest in a line of factory farm animals to benefit from the growing movement to extend humane care to agricultural animals raised to be exploited or slaughtered.

In the last decade, beef slaughterhouses have adopted relatively kinder procedures, and some states have outlawed confining cages for farm animals such as pigs and calves.

As consumer consciousness has been raised about veal calves immobilized in crates and foie gras ducks force-fed with tubes down their throats, so the plight of the country’s 300 million egg-laying hens -- 95% of which can barely move in their cages -- has come to the fore.

Advertisement

“Battery cage eggs are becoming the next veal,” said Paul Shapiro, manager of the Factory Farming Campaign of the Humane Society, referring to years of animal welfare activism to publicize the conditions of veal calves.

“Battery cages are among the cruelest factory farming systems in place today,” said Gene Bauston, president of Farm Sanctuary, a national farm animal welfare group. “The hens are packed in these wire cages. They can’t stretch their wings, they can’t walk, they can’t exercise.”

Non-caged hens are kept in large barns -- still in huge numbers but with enough space to move around, perch, dust-bathe and engage in other natural behaviors.

Advertisement

Representatives of egg producers insisted Tuesday that their cage systems were consistent with animal welfare standards set by independent animal experts. “The egg industry four years ago embarked on a major industry initiative to look at the cage production system and determine if it was humane and ethical,” said Mitch Head, spokesperson for United Egg Producers, a trade association of egg farmers based in Alpharetta, Ga.

The Humane Society, however, says egg-buying consumers reject current cage conditions for hens.

“In the past 12 months we have seen an absolute sea change on this issue,” Shapiro said.

In the last year, Whole Foods Market and Wild Oats Natural Marketplace -- both prominent natural-food chains -- announced they would no longer sell eggs from battery-caged hens. So did several universities and food-service providers.

Last fall, the Humane Society led a four-month campaign -- including leaflets and newspaper ads displaying chickens wedged into cages -- to get Trader Joe’s to stop selling eggs from caged birds. The chain’s agreement to switch its house brand to cage-free eggs has just taken effect.

“Over the past several months we have been listening to what our customers tell us about the choices we give them, specifically about their choices related to eggs,” said a note posted Tuesday on the official Trader Joe’s website. “As of today, all Trader Joe’s brand eggs will come only from cage-free hens.”

Egg producers who do sell cage-free eggs market their treatment of the fowl lavishly. On its website, Chino Valley Ranchers describes its hens’ accommodations in spa-like terms: “The hens are housed in a valley, next to a free running stream ... “

Advertisement

But most consumers are, at best, conflicted over the connection between the lives of farm animals and the food on their tables. Few have the same level of concern for a nameless hen that they have for Ginger, their beloved golden retriever. “I think the majority of people in America have never heard of a battery cage,” Shapiro conceded.

Unlike veal, the flavor of which is affected by the ability of the calf to move around, the taste of an egg does not change whether the hen lives its short life in a cage or in a large barn. (Generally, only a different diet alters the taste of the egg.)

“Most people have no clue how their eggs are produced,” Farm Sanctuary’s Bauston said. “There probably are people whose awareness needs to be raised.” Egg producers on Tuesday said they did consider the welfare of the hens on their farms. According to Head, following advice from animal experts, producers in recent years increased hen space from approximately 48 square inches to the current 67.

“It’s really the optimum space. If you give birds more space than that, they become territorial and start pecking each other,” Head said. “All of this is based on science.”

He dismissed animal welfare activists’ contention that caged birds do not get a chance to flap their wings. That, he said, “is like a person in an elevator saying they want to flap their arms. All I’m saying is flapping your wings is just an aggressive and territorial behavior that is not conducive to hens’ welfare.”

Richard Matteis, executive director of the Pacific Egg & Poultry Assn., said California producers are guided in their egg farming practices by veterinary experts. “Lots of science has gone into the production here; that includes an incredible amount of attention to animal welfare. Our eggs are safe,” Matteis said.

Advertisement

The Humane Society lawsuit, however, quotes various veterinary studies saying that caged hens suffer “osteoporosis and fractures” and that “the space available in a battery cage does not allow hens even to stand still in the way they would in a more spacious environment.”

But even the Humane Society’s strategy concedes that this is an area of animal protection that isn’t as passionately embraced as with safeguards for companion pets.

The lawsuit asks the court to take away egg producers’ 5.25% sales tax break on the purchase of cages because they violate the California penal code law against keeping an animal in a confined space without offering an adequate exercise space.

It doesn’t ask the court to outlaw the cages. Lovvorn thinks the state would be reluctant to bring the full brunt of the law down on egg farmers. “It’s not our goal to run out and start arresting people,” Lovvorn said. “We want the state to discourage rather than encourage this behavior.”

Advertisement