Opinion Editorial

Yes on Measure U

Los Angeles County is asking voters in its unincorporated communities to ratify and modify an existing telephone tax in much the same way that voters did earlier this year in the cities of Los Angeles, Pasadena, Culver City and a number of other municipalities. In this era of financial uncertainty, when governments are starved for vital cash and voters are being asked to fund new services, this one is easy. Voters should keep their current services intact and their tax bills, on balance, the same. The Times urges a yes vote on Measure U.

There are some key things to keep in mind. First, only voters in unincorporated areas pay this tax, and only they will vote on this measure. The tax applies to residents and businesses that are billed for utilities in parts of the county that are not cities. If you're billed in the city of L.A., for example, or one of 44 other cities in the county with its own utility tax, this one doesn't apply to you. If you're billed in Lancaster, or one of the other 42 cities in the county with no utility tax, this one doesn't apply to you either.

But 65% of Los Angeles County's 4,084 square miles is not part of any city. If you're billed in one of those places -- communities without mayors or city councils, including Rowland Heights, City Terrace, Stevenson Ranch and about 100 others -- you currently pay a 5% tax on utilities, including telephone service. Measure U will be on your ballot and, if it passes with a simple majority vote, will lower your tax to 4.5% and make clear that it applies to cellphones and other "new" communications technologies.

In those unincorporated areas, Los Angeles County supplements its regular programs, such as child welfare and health, with the libraries, public works and safety services that cities usually provide. The utility tax helps pay for it by raising $65 million, although the Board of Supervisors spends just under a third of it to supplement the county's health services.

In fact, the board could spend the money any way it wants to, because it's a general tax, not earmarked for any particular purpose. That's why it needs only a simple majority to pass. But the supervisors have been prudent with the revenue, knowing that residents of the unincorporated communities demand basic services and will rebel at the ballot box if they don't get them.

Most utility taxes were imposed when there was only one telephone company, everybody had land lines, and it was easy to figure out how to bill for service and add a simple tax. Things changed when cellphones became common; counties and cities tried to extend their taxes to those services but discovered, in court, that intervening state initiatives on taxing required voters to approve or reject any changes.

Like similar ballot measures elsewhere in the state, this one makes clear that any call made with any technology is subject to the same tax. Federal law that bars taxing the Internet keeps this tax from reaching Internet access services, and if that law changes, voters would get to weigh in again. But to make it exceedingly clear, Supervisor Michael Antonovich insisted on adding language that clarifies that this measure, if passed, could never apply to Internet access.

The Times appreciates the honesty of cities such as Pasadena, which asked voters to ratify its tax as-is, without enticing them with a half-percent decrease the way the city of Los Angeles did. The county is taking the latter route. We urge county leaders to be straightforward with voters by explaining that Measure U will probably be revenue-neutral, lowering some taxes by extending the tax to other technologies. That said, it's a good deal for voters in unincorporated areas, who should follow the examples of their city neighbors and vote yes.

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Ukraine should put Russia to the test
    Ukraine should put Russia to the test

    Ukraine is now strong enough to seize the initiative to create a lasting cease-fire in its Donbas Rust Belt, currently occupied by Russia and its proxies. And Russia may be weak enough to be receptive. It is in Kiev's interest to do so. A state of permanent war with Russia would damage...

  • The great fear of the great outdoors
    The great fear of the great outdoors

    Americans find ourselves in a period — arguably, the first in our nation's history — when our unease about being in nature is coming to outweigh our desire for it. We have a growing intolerance for inconvenience, a feeling well captured by the suburban fifth-grader who memorably...

  • Animals and humans sometimes kill their young -- the question is why
    Animals and humans sometimes kill their young -- the question is why

    Among the endless stream of bad news in the media, every now and then something occurs that it is so horrendous that it stops us in our tracks. That has happened once again with Tuesday's massacre at a school in Peshawar, Pakistan. Among the victims: 132 children who died — many of them...

  • The snackification of everything
    The snackification of everything

    Symbols matter, which is why it's important to acknowledge that our truest national emblem isn't an eagle or a dollar sign or even a handgun, though each will have its proponents.

  • Some Sony lessons: What a difference a hack makes
    Some Sony lessons: What a difference a hack makes

    The Sony hack and the demise of "The Interview" have people howling about appeasement, corporate shenanigans and Kim Jong Un's private life. What will happen next? What should have happened already? And how will it ripple through Hollywood, Washington and even North Korea? Here are four...

  • Pandora cites free speech to defend against artist demands for royalties
    Pandora cites free speech to defend against artist demands for royalties

    Led by key members of the 1960s rock band the Turtles, oldies artists have persuaded a series of judges in California and New York that they are entitled to royalty payments from Sirius XM.