This is the first year in more than four decades that I haven't been in the legislative branch of government. During that span, I've witnessed government's greatest potential as well as its calamitous capacity for dysfunction. Unfortunately, the latter is now drastically outweighing the former.
When I got my start, in the Maine
That notion sounds almost irretrievably quaint in our present, corrosive political environment.
In making the incredibly difficult decision last year to leave the
To be clear, I'm not suggesting there was a "golden era" of bipartisanship. There were always vigorous debates and deep political divisions. Yet we weren't consumed by what separated us. There was instead an abiding sense that reconciliation was achievable because our ultimate allegiance was to the best interests of the country.
Indeed, during my 34 years in
At the House of Representatives in Washington in 1979, I joined the Congressional Caucus on Women's Issues, which I co-chaired for more than 10 years with Rep. Pat Schroeder (D-Colo.). Despite the political differences among women in the House, we knew we couldn't afford to draw lines in the sand on issues of importance to women, with female members so drastically underrepresented in Congress.
This was a time when economic equality pertained only to economic equality among men, when our laws failed to reflect the changing, dual responsibilities of women who were increasingly working as well as caring for a family. But through an adherence to bipartisanship and to principle over politics, together we changed that.
This kind of cooperation was still the norm when I arrived in the Senate in 1995. It was a cross-aisle alliance between Democratic Sen.
Or during the tax debates we had in Congress in 2001, Democratic
Can you imagine these kinds of collaborative initiatives today?
Instead, Congress has arrived at a moment when policy-making has been virtually abandoned. It has devolved into a series of "gotcha" votes for political leverage. Rather than legislating, it's all about "messaging" amendments, which aren't designed to solve a problem but to create the basis for appeals to each party's political base and 30-second soundbites for the next election.
As a consequence, Congress lurches from one self-inflicted crisis to another, and that is no way to govern. This abdication of leadership has led us directly to a
Still, there is hope. Ultimately, we get the government we demand.
What is required is a political reward at the ballot box for those politicians who work toward common ground, and a penalty for those who do not. That's my message now. And to further it, I've established Olympia's List, a rallying point for those interested in identifying and supporting candidates who are willing to reach across the political aisle and follow the principles of consensus-building. And at the Bipartisan Policy Center, where I am a senior fellow, we are encouraging Americans to join a new effort called Citizens for Political Reform to demand bipartisanship.
There are already plenty of incentives for incendiary rhetoric and thwarting action. We can alter those incentives. What is necessary now is a counterweight to the extremism, a groundswell of recognition that there is strength in compromise, courage in conciliation and honor in consensus-building that will leave a legacy of responsible stewardship for the generations to come.
That is the essence of my new line of work, and I'll be fighting tooth and nail to make it happen so that Congress can, in fact, govern once again.