Opinion
Reading Los Angeles: Join The Times' new book club
Opinion Opinion L.A.
Opinion

Let's look at the death penalty with statistics instead of emotion

Diving into the death penalty. It ain't pretty
Botched Arizona execution deservedly revives a national debate over the death penalty

The horror show on Arizona’s death row this week has deservedly raised yet another national debate over the death penalty, particularly lethal injections by states scrambling for fresh killing agents as they find it harder to procure tried-and-true execution drugs.

During this debate, it’s useful to look at the scope of the death penalty these days (and yes, I’m a firm opponent of the practice for reasons I’ve made clear in earlier posts). According to a database maintained by the Death Penalty Information Center, there have been 26 executions since Jan. 1. Ten of those have involved the sedative midazolam as the first injection in two- and three-drug protocols. Three executions have been botched; each involved procedures using midazolam.

The details matter. In Ohio, Dennis McGuire was seen writhing and gasping as his execution took place, after a doctor warned that the planned dosage of midazolam would not be sufficient to render McGuire unconscious to the point where he would not suffer from the ensuing injections. McGuire reacted pretty much the way the doctor warned he would, struggling to breathe from "air hunger." Still, Arizona decided to use that very same protocol this week in executing Joseph Wood. We know how that went, nearly two hours in all, including hundreds of gasps for breath, as reported by journalist witnesses.

In the third botched execution involving midazolam, the drug itself may have been a nonfactor in the suffering of Clayton Lockett. It appears the Oklahoma executioners, after failing in numerous attempts to find a usable vein elsewhere on his body, implanted the needle in Lockett's groin, thinking they had finally hit a vein. They missed. The state aborted the execution after it became clear Lockett was in great pain, and wasn’t dying; he subsequently succumbed to a heart attack. That investigation continues.

So setting aside Lockett’s execution as likely being botched for reasons beyond the drugs used, two of the remaining nine uses of midazolam led to visible discomfort by the dying man. That’s a failure rate of 22%. For the three botched executions out of 26 that have taken place this year, the failure rate is nearly 12%, though it must be noted that the non-midazolam executions didn’t seem to involve out of the ordinary pain (which doesn’t mean the executions were unconstitutional; the mere practice is the definition of cruel and unusual).

It’s useful to note, also, that of the 26 executions this year, 10 of the condemned were white, 12 were black, and four were Latino (three of whom were noncitizens).

The 36 victims of those convicted murders? Twenty-seven were white, four were black, four were Latino, and one was Asian. All of the 10 executed white men were convicted of killing whites. Eight of the 12 executed black men killed white victims. Yet an FBI analysis of 2012 statistics found that in homicides in which the victim's race was reported, 51.1% were black, 46.3% were white, with other races accounting for the rest.

That's an uncomfortable disparity.

There’s also a strong statistical chance that at least one of those 26 executed men may have been innocent. Earlier this year, the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences published a study that concluded that if all those sentenced to death remained under that sentence, at least 4.1% of them would likely be eventually exonerated of the crime. For you statistical wonks, the study is here.

Without even getting into the moral and ethical transgressions that capital punishment poses, this is a failed system.

Follow Scott Martelle on Twitter @smartelle.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Carolyn Ramsay for L.A. Council District 4
    Carolyn Ramsay for L.A. Council District 4

    The race to replace longtime City Councilman Tom LaBonge started out promisingly — there were 14 candidates from inside politics and out, some more serious than others, but enough who were smart, enterprising and scrappy. Now, after an appallingly low turnout primary in a district known for its...

  • Bill on drug pricing would help state in figuring healthcare costs
    Bill on drug pricing would help state in figuring healthcare costs

    A new crop of specialty drugs holds great promise for treating or even curing some devastating diseases, but their high cost challenges health insurers and taxpayer-funded health programs. In California, Gov. Jerry Brown has asked for $300 million in the coming fiscal year's budget just for specialty...

  • Shorter showers? Nine more ways the state has to change its water ways
    Shorter showers? Nine more ways the state has to change its water ways

    Heading into the fourth summer of drought, water agencies are looking for ways to get Californians to conserve at home. Tear out lawns. Install low-flow toilets. Irrigate with gray water. But what should the whole state be doing? Opinion asked nine water experts what needs to change about how California...

  • Evolving awareness is cause for same-sex-marriage optimism in court
    Evolving awareness is cause for same-sex-marriage optimism in court

    On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Ohio case of Obergefell vs. Hodges, as well as three related cases from Kentucky, Michigan and Tennessee. The court is then expected to decide whether the Constitution requires states to grant gay people the same rights in marriage as...

  • The deepest war wound may be the anguish of moral injury
    The deepest war wound may be the anguish of moral injury

    When the Greek playwright Sophocles came home from war, in the 5th century BC, trust and betrayal must have been on his mind. He wrote “Philoctetes,” about a wounded Greek warrior abandoned by Odysseus on the way to Troy.

  • Are we winning the drone war?
    Are we winning the drone war?

    Almost two years ago, President Obama announced that he was tightening the rules under which the CIA carries out drone strikes against suspected terrorists in Pakistan, Yemen and other countries. “Before any strike is taken, there must be a near-certainty that no civilians will be killed or injured...

Comments
Loading