OpinionOpinion L.A.
Opinion

Every business should listen to Taylor Swift's advice

Music IndustryTaylor Swift
Taylor Swift has written a smart, optimistic Op-Ed aimed at guiding the music industry forward
Want to stay in business? Follow Taylor Swift's rules

The music industry isn’t dying, argues Taylor Swift in an Op-Ed for the Wall Street Journal. “It's just coming alive,” she writes.

In her Op-Ed, Swift explains her strategy for making it as a musician in this day and age. It all boils down to this: Believe in your craft and produce a solid product that people are willing to pay for. Make an emotional connection with your audience. Understand the technological landscape so that you can use it to your advantage.

It’s a solid argument, and not just for the music industry. Any business with consumers needs to follow these rules.

One example I found especially resonant is the effort she takes to keep the magic alive for her fans even in our instant-access, immediate-gratification era.

“I think forming a bond with fans in the future will come in the form of constantly providing them with the element of surprise. No, I did not say ‘shock’; I said ‘surprise.’ I believe couples can stay in love for decades if they just continue to surprise each other, so why can’t this love affair exist between an artist and their fans?” she asks. She’s even a romantic when writing an Op-Ed for WSJ!

She gives this example: “In the YouTube generation we live in, I walked out onstage every night of my stadium tour last year knowing almost every fan had already seen the show online. To continue to show them something they had never seen before, I brought out dozens of special guest performers to sing their hits with me. My generation was raised being able to flip channels if we got bored, and we read the last page of the book when we got impatient. We want to be caught off guard, delighted, left in awe. I hope the next generation’s artists will continue to think of inventive ways of keeping their audiences on their toes, as challenging as that might be.”

Swift also emphasizes the importance of artists investing in their social currency: “A friend of mine, who is an actress, told me that when the casting for her recent movie came down to two actresses, the casting director chose the actress with more Twitter followers,” she writes, arguing: “In the future, artists will get record deals because they have fans — not the other way around.”

It may be tempting to reject Swift’s point of view or her sunny optimism, but she hasn’t said anything new here. This is the way of the world now, and she’s doing a particularly good job of making it in this landscape.

Of course, not all artists appreciate the changing tide. “For the last 20 years we’ve witnessed an assault on the arts by the technology community — especially when it comes to music,” T Bone Burnett wrote in our Op-Ed pages in June.

David Lowery of the bands Camper Van Beethoven and Cracker has been particularly outspoken. As Times editorial writer Jon Healey has explained:

“Lowery’s complaints all seem to boil down to lamentations about the scale and automation of the Web, along with the technology-fueled shift toward unlimited consumption and unlimited inventory. Unlike pay-TV, the music business wasn’t built to sell access to bundles of entertainment. It was built to let individual artists (and their labels) extract cash from fans of their specific works. So when consumers switch from paying $15 for one artist’s CD to paying $0 to $10 for access to all recorded music for a month, the artist’s revenue stream gets massively diluted.”

Unlike the old days, artists can’t rely on royalties to float them. They have to keep hustling, as Zoë Keating of the cello-rock band Rasputina wrote in our Op-Ed pages last year:

“Without a doubt today’s climate favors artists who are actively touring and releasing music. In other words, there is no retirement anymore, which makes the music industry like most other industries. Is that so bleak?” she asks.  

Like Swift, though, Keating has embraced the change. “Yes, I have to keep making more music, keep touring and keep competing for my listeners attention. But that’s what I want to do anyway,” she wrote. The business of music continues to evolve, but the essence of being a musician remains the same: We make music, and we want people to hear it.”

And, as every musician knows, there are ways to turn a profit even as album sales dwindle. It’s called merch.

Follow Alexandra Le Tellier on Twitter @alexletellier

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
Music IndustryTaylor Swift
  • 'The music industry is not dying' -- Taylor Swift
    'The music industry is not dying' -- Taylor Swift

    Most of what Taylor Swift writes for public consumption ends up coming to us through ear buds or loudspeakers, but this week she has turned her attention from song lyrics about bad boyfriends to prose with an opinion piece for the Wall Street Journal. Her topic? The future of the music...

  • The new Rand Paul vs. the old Rand Paul
    The new Rand Paul vs. the old Rand Paul

    Rand Paul, the heretofore libertarian senator from Kentucky, gave a foreign policy speech to Republican grandees in New York last week with a clear message: I'm not an isolationist like my dad.

  • A radical cancer therapy: Don't treat
    A radical cancer therapy: Don't treat

    We learned about my husband's inoperable brain tumor from a nurse who doled out the news as though providing his cholesterol count. Mark stood frozen. I clutched at him and wailed.

  • Looking Ebola in the eye, with help from Camus
    Looking Ebola in the eye, with help from Camus

    Ebola's exponential growth and extraterritorial reach has caused commentators across the ideological spectrum — from former U.S. Central Command chief Gen. Anthony Zinni to the Daily Kos — to describe the spread of the virus as an “existential threat.” For...

  • Parents, too, could use a break on student loan debt
    Parents, too, could use a break on student loan debt

    Sen. Elizabeth Warren has been fighting the good fight for student loan debt reform. As she put it recently: "Millions of young people are just stuck. They can't buy homes, they can't buy cars … all because they are struggling under the weight of student loan debt."

  • Endorsement video: Vote yes on Prop. 48 and let the North Fork tribe build a casino
    Endorsement video: Vote yes on Prop. 48 and let the North Fork tribe build a casino

    There's a temptation to view Proposition 48 as a larger statement on Indian gambling in California. But the ballot measure isn't a policy question on off-reservation casinos, it's a referendum on a specific gambling agreement.

  • Just what does this U.N. agency want to do to the Internet?
    Just what does this U.N. agency want to do to the Internet?

    The International Telecommunication Union, an arm of the United Nations that oversees global communications networks, has alarmed tech advocates by debating whether to extend its authority to the Internet. Although it's chilling to think of the U.N. asserting jurisdiction over an area...

  • A 21st century voting system for Los Angeles
    A 21st century voting system for Los Angeles

    It sounded like a good idea at the time: modernizing elections with touch-screen voting and instant tabulation. Enough with the punch cards and the ink dots, and enough with the endless waits for election results when helicopters carrying paper ballots from far-flung precincts are grounded...

Comments
Loading