Get Opinion in your inbox -- sign up for our weekly newsletter
Opinion L.A.
Opinion Opinion L.A.

Watergate is worth it, honest

One of the commenters on the post "Watergate's Saturday Night Massacre gets more interesting with age" asked: "Why is the liberal/progressive LATs [sic] replaying 40-year-old history?"

Here's the answer.

First, illustrator Steve Brodner came to The Times with a cartoon about the events of Oct. 20, 1973. He was inspired by a friend who is in his 20s and whose reaction to Watergate is "What's the big deal?"

To Brodner, that represented insufficient knowledge of the serious issues raised by the "long national nightmare" that began with the break-in at Democratic Party headquarters, tipped toward constitutional crisis as President Nixon tried to derail a criminal investigation by firing Special Prosecutor Archibald Cox in the Saturday Night Massacre, and ended only when Nixon resigned rather than be impeached by the full House and tried — almost certainly to lose — in the Senate.

Brodner thought a history lesson was in order. We on the Op-Ed page agreed.

In the editing process, I came across a firsthand account of the Saturday Night Massacre, a 2009 speech by William Ruckelshaus, who held the job of deputy attorney general for just 23 days in 1973. Along with his boss, Atty. Gen. Elliot Richardson, Ruckelshaus quit rather than follow Nixon's "fire Cox" order. He didn't play a lead role that Saturday, but his is a good story nonetheless, told matter-of-factly, even wryly.

That self-effacing tone does nothing to hide the inherent drama in the events. This is a real person, a person you can relate to, who with history breathing down his neck decided what was right and acted on it. Ruckelshaus said it wasn't difficult, but it doesn't exactly read that way. His speech added nuance to Brodner's cartoon, so I blogged about it.

Of course, there are bigger reasons than a well-told tale and a history lesson to replay Watergate. Archibald Cox explained what was at stake in the Saturday Night Massacre: "Whether ours shall continue to be a government of laws and not of men is now for Congress and ultimately the American people," he said shortly after he was fired.

We passed the test but, in Ruckelshaus' words, only after "incalculable harm."


Preserving the Affordable Care Act

Heartburn's a symptom, not a disease

Leave the Nevada school shooter's parents alone

Follow Susan Brenneman on Twitter @susanbrenneman

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • An end to shackling prisoners in federal court

    An end to shackling prisoners in federal court

    It's obvious that placing a criminal defendant in handcuffs and leg shackles runs the risk of prejudicing a jury. But even when only a judge is present, a policy of shackling a defendant violates his dignity, mocks the presumption of innocence and offends what the Supreme Court has called the "dignity...

  • Using cap-and-trade money for road repair doesn't pass muster

    Using cap-and-trade money for road repair doesn't pass muster

    To many California Republicans, it looks like a perfect match. On the one hand, the state can no longer ignore the deferred maintenance of its roads and bridges, not to mention the need for new ones in some areas. On the other, the state has a big pot of money that more than doubled in size to...

  • Ohio's nonsensical attack on abortion rights

    Ohio's nonsensical attack on abortion rights

    A bill in the Ohio Legislature that would ban a woman from having an abortion solely because of a prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome is blatantly unconstitutional and probably unenforceable.

  • Face it, most millennial dads are hypocrites

    Face it, most millennial dads are hypocrites

    Around the time my firstborn was learning to walk, my wife and I tried a tag-team approach to parenting. I'd take most of the early morning shifts and then head to the office. Most evenings, no matter what was happening at work, I'd log back in at home, and my wife would pursue her career as a...

  • Joseph Stiglitz explains why the Fed shouldn't raise interest rates

    Joseph Stiglitz explains why the Fed shouldn't raise interest rates

    As central bank governors, Federal Reserve officials, economists and reporters convene for the annual economic policy retreat in Jackson Hole, Wyo., this weekend, the question on everyone's mind is: Will the Fed raise interest rates come September?

  • Why L.A.'s crime rise is no surprise

    Why L.A.'s crime rise is no surprise

    After more than a decade of decline, violent crime in Los Angeles rose more than 20% during the first half of 2015, with felony assaults up 26% and robberies up 19%. Why, no one yet definitively knows. But there's plenty of speculation.