OpinionReaders React
Readers React

Making Californians serious about cutting water use

Water SupplyCalifornia Drought

To the editor: Instead of trying to set a water-use quota backed up by fines, it would be far easier to restructure the usage charges based on the current tiered schedule. ("California officials admit they have incomplete water usage data," July 26)

For example, if the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power were to double the charges on the second tier and quadruple the charges for any usage above that, it would probably prod more consumers to reduce their water consumption immediately without incurring yet more expenses and delay in its implementation.

American consumers are more sensitive to their pocketbooks than anything else, as evidenced by the inverse correlation between the price of a gallon of gas and the total mileage driven by motorists.

Our water shortage is dire and calls for an immediate solution, not more studies.

John T. Chiu, Newport Beach


To the editor: If the state is serious about reducing water usage, a fine place to start would be with the various state agencies and cities.

Mid-afternoon the other day, I took an exit off the 405 Freeway and noticed sprinklers drenching a median made up mostly of weeds. And most of that water was actually landing on asphalt, missing the weeds entirely.

It is kind of hard to take this effort seriously when you have the government absolutely wasting water like this.

Richard Hormel, Los Angeles


To the editor: We will never get a major sector of the population to conserve as long as "all you can use" water is included for apartment renters. Landlords have no way to induce tenants to conserve, and there is no motivation for them to do so on their own.

Altruism doesn't seem to work here.

Nancy Loder, Toluca Lake

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
Water SupplyCalifornia Drought
  • For immigrants who stay, citizenship is an obligation

    To the editor: Thank you for your series on what it means to be a U.S. citizen in the 21st century. I moved to the United States in 1992, not out of necessity but because I wanted to. I come from a wealthy political family in Mexico City, where my life was easy and comfortable. But I wanted...

  • If the U.S. wants peace, it must prepare for nuclear war

    To the editor: I strongly disagree with Joe Cirincione's belief that the U.S. ought not continue to modernize its formidable nuclear arsenal. ("How big a nuclear arsenal do we really need?," Op-Ed, Oct. 21)

  • Oil rigs and fish don't mix

    To the editor: According to Jonah Goldberg, defunct oil rigs are the savior fish have been waiting for. ("The good news about offshore oil rigs," Op-Ed, Oct. 20)

  • Deal with mansionization in L.A. -- now

    To the editor: One homeowner is quoted as saying, "It's not that anybody wants to purposely rob people of light and air and sun." True, but there is an apparent callous indifference by those who build oversized mansions. As long as they end up the beneficiaries of someone...

  • Nearly all mass shooters are men. Why is that?

    To the editor: Articles on mass shooters rarely explore why they are almost always men. I have a doctorate in psychology and two published books on the subject, including a study of the difference between patrilineal and matrilineal societies and their different personality outcomes....

  • Real democracies don't discourage voting

    To the editor: Americans like to brag about our democracy and the right of our citizens to vote. However, from the beginning of our country, voting rights were restricted. Initially, only white men who were property owners could vote. ("High court action on Texas ID law shows mixed...