Get Opinion in your inbox -- sign up for our weekly newsletter
Readers React
Opinion Readers React
Readers React

Making Californians serious about cutting water use

To the editor: Instead of trying to set a water-use quota backed up by fines, it would be far easier to restructure the usage charges based on the current tiered schedule. ("California officials admit they have incomplete water usage data," July 26)

For example, if the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power were to double the charges on the second tier and quadruple the charges for any usage above that, it would probably prod more consumers to reduce their water consumption immediately without incurring yet more expenses and delay in its implementation.

American consumers are more sensitive to their pocketbooks than anything else, as evidenced by the inverse correlation between the price of a gallon of gas and the total mileage driven by motorists.

Our water shortage is dire and calls for an immediate solution, not more studies.

John T. Chiu, Newport Beach


To the editor: If the state is serious about reducing water usage, a fine place to start would be with the various state agencies and cities.

Mid-afternoon the other day, I took an exit off the 405 Freeway and noticed sprinklers drenching a median made up mostly of weeds. And most of that water was actually landing on asphalt, missing the weeds entirely.

It is kind of hard to take this effort seriously when you have the government absolutely wasting water like this.

Richard Hormel, Los Angeles


To the editor: We will never get a major sector of the population to conserve as long as "all you can use" water is included for apartment renters. Landlords have no way to induce tenants to conserve, and there is no motivation for them to do so on their own.

Altruism doesn't seem to work here.

Nancy Loder, Toluca Lake

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Iran nuclear deal: After 10 years, are all bets off?

    To the editor: The position that The Times takes with regard to the Iran nuclear deal is informative and balanced, and it frames the issues succinctly. For that I am thankful. However, it is not persuasive in its endorsement of the deal. ("Weighing the Iran nuclear deal: far from perfect, but the...

  • Mandatory kindergarten: Not all kids are ready at age 5

    To the editor: I couldn't agree more with your editorial opposed to a state bill requiring kindergarten. Not everyone is ready for kindergarten at age 5, nor should they be forced into it at that age before they are developmentally ready. ("Compulsory kindergarten: Still a bad idea," editorial,...

  • Napa Valley Wine Train: Who's being intolerant?

    To the editor: What a twisted rationalization from Sandy Banks regarding the Sistahs on the Reading Edge Book Club's trip on the Napa Valley Wine Train. ("When your seatmates are loud and louder," column, Sept. 1)

  • Canada shows the U.S. how to run a good election

    Canada shows the U.S. how to run a good election

    To the editor: For those of us who have studied parliamentary democracies, it's no surprise that our northern neighbor has a stable, well-run and efficient democratic system. Limited election seasons, limited money expended on campaigning and national broadcasters obligated to offer free on-air...

  • The Obama administration's post-Ferguson rhetoric and attacks on police

    To the editor: Obviously The Times is right that the police are now facing a new foe, the public. But what is missing in this article is the root of this animosity. To me it's a no-brainer. ("Police worry about their own safety after killings: 'It's a different world,'" Aug. 31)

  • An inspiring account of the busboy who helped Robert Kennedy

    To the editor: What a deeply moving and phenomenal column from Steve Lopez about the life of the busboy who tended to the mortally wounded Robert F. Kennedy in 1968. ("The busboy who cradled a dying RFK has finally stepped out of the past," Aug. 29)