OpinionTop of the Ticket

On healthcare, Romney is muddled while GOP PACs brazenly lie

PoliticsMitt RomneyRepublican PartyAffordable Care Act (Obamacare)Rick SantorumDemocratic Party

The Republican stance on healthcare is a strange mix of muddle and mendacity. The muddle comes from the GOP’s presumptive nominee for president, Mitt Romney. The mendacity is the work of conservative "super PACs" that are spending millions on new attack ads built around a brazen lie.

Rick Santorum was absolutely right when, during his primary battle with Romney, he said the former Massachusetts governor was “the worst Republican in the country” to pick as point man to oppose the Democrats’ healthcare plan. That was made manifest on Thursday in the moments after the announcement of the Supreme Court decision upholding most of the Affordable Care Act. With the U.S. Capitol in the background, Romney stepped before the TV cameras and declared that on his first day as president he would start dismantling the monstrosity he calls “Obamacare.” Then, he ticked off the measures he would implement to improve healthcare in America – each one of them a component of the “monstrosity” he wants to kill. 

PHOTOS: Top of the Ticket cartoons

The often-noted reason Santorum called Romney a bad choice to lead this fight is that Obamacare is just a national version of "Romneycare," the state plan instituted in Massachusetts under Gov. Romney that now is overwhelmingly popular with the citizens of the Bay State. As a presidential candidate, Romney is forced into a position of calling evil what he once proclaimed as good – a grand flip-flop. Either that or he is reduced to making a narrow argument that states, not the federal government, should have the responsibility for doing all these good things in healthcare. On the campaign trail, he has done both and the result is a muddled message.

The message from the right-wing super PACs is much more clear: “Obamacare raises half a trillion in taxes on Americans!” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. did Republicans a favor by basing the healthcare ruling on the taxing power of Congress. The mandate in the law that requires all Americans to obtain health insurance or pay a penalty is constitutional, Roberts said, because it is just another tax.

As a political cudgel, that little three-letter word – T-A-X – is every conservative’s favorite. Thanks to Roberts, Republicans were suddenly on familiar ground, able once again to slam Democrats for imposing yet another tax. The super PACs with their hoard of billionaires’ money wasted no time. Within 24 hours of the Supreme Court decision, Karl Rove’s Crossroads GPS had updated an attack ad in North Dakota to make the half-trillion-dollar tax increase claim. Just as quickly, the Koch brothers’ favorite PAC, Americans for Prosperity, launched a $9-million ad campaign that calls the healthcare act “one of the largest tax increases in American history.”

Running in 12 swing states, the voice-over in the Koch-funded ad asks, “How can we afford this tax?” The honest answer is: We can afford it because very few Americans will ever pay it. The only people who might get hit with the penalty are the minuscule number of citizens who can afford health insurance but refuse to buy it, thereby sticking the rest of us with their hospital bills when they get sick. The projected yearly amount to be raised by this penalty – or tax – is $6 billion. That’s a long way from half a trillion.

Apart from the tax penalty in the mandate, there is also the fact that one way the healthcare plan could be paid for is by not renewing theGeorge W. Bush-era tax cut for the wealthy. Again in this case, they can afford it.

The scary numbers these PAC rats are throwing around are akin to the fake numbers kids invent, like “gazillion” or “bajillion,” when they are trying to describe something really big. In the case of kids, they are just exaggerating. In the case of the conservative billionaires, they are simply telling a big, fat fib.

PHOTOS: Top of the Ticket cartoons

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
PoliticsMitt RomneyRepublican PartyAffordable Care Act (Obamacare)Rick SantorumDemocratic Party
  • Swing-state Latinos could end Mitt Romney's White House dream
    Swing-state Latinos could end Mitt Romney's White House dream

    It is becoming increasingly difficult for Mitt Romney to climb out of the hole he has dug for himself with Latino voters, and, as a result, that hole could turn into a grave for his presidential campaign.

  • 100 years after World War I, what have we learned?
    100 years after World War I, what have we learned?

    In October 1962, in the midst of the nuclear confrontation with the Soviet Union that would eventually become known as the Cuban Missile Crisis, the Joint Chiefs of Staff unanimously recommended to President Kennedy that he order an attack on the island presided over by Moscow’s proxy, Fidel...

  • State Senate should approve proposed drone regulations
    State Senate should approve proposed drone regulations

    The use of drones could revolutionize business, government and law enforcement. Imagine, for example, small unmanned aircraft flying low to the ground to deliver precise measures of pesticides to agricultural fields, reducing the amount of dangerous chemicals used. Drones already have proved...

  • College campuses are fertile ground for promoting Obamacare
    College campuses are fertile ground for promoting Obamacare

    Much has been made of the need to enroll "young invincibles" under the Affordable Care Act. These are young adults who, according to many, are often uninsured because they think they don't need insurance. They are also critically important to the success of the ACA. Without their...

  • The LAUSD board election matters; voters should turn out
    The LAUSD board election matters; voters should turn out

    On Aug. 12, voters in Los Angeles Unified School District Board of Education District 1 will choose between Alex Johnson and George McKenna. The winner will join the LAUSD's seven-member board and will represent some of the region's poorest communities, desperately in need of...

  • Why should Richard Alarcon get a full pension?
    Why should Richard Alarcon get a full pension?

    Former Los Angeles City Councilman Richard Alarcon was found guilty last week of perjury and voter fraud for lying about living in his district. But even though the jury concluded that he wasn't actually eligible to serve as councilman during the time he was living elsewhere, Alarcon...

Comments
Loading