Advertisement

Fraud Goes Through (Mansion) Roof, Georgians Say

Share
TIMES STAFF WRITER

There is a suburb going up here filled with fantastic towers of brick and steel, the kitschy dream homes of current and former officials who could not afford to buy on their government salaries alone.

The price tags: between $3 million and $4 million.

That officials on meager state salaries--the head of government, President Eduard A. Shevardnadze, makes only $190 a month--are buying these homes is evidence, say Georgian analysts and journalists, of colossal corruption.

Georgia has absorbed about $900 million in U.S. aid during the last five years, and the mansions raise disturbing questions about the value of pouring dollars into a corrupt system.

Advertisement

“The result of that aid in almost any sphere, except food aid, is very hard to detect. One reason is incompetence of post-Soviet structures, but corruption played an enormous role,” said Anatol Lieven, a senior associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington, who is writing a book on Georgia.

In the post-Soviet era, Georgia was anointed by the West as a likely candidate for future North Atlantic Treaty Organization membership, a stable pipeline route for Western companies’ oil and a reliable ally to counterbalance Russian power in the region.

Disappointing Progress

But its progress toward democratic institutions and a market economy has been disappointing. The divide between rich bureaucrats and the mass of disgruntled, impoverished Georgians is wider than ever.

The biggest symbol of Georgia’s failure to establish a stable democracy was the April 2000 presidential election, which was sharply criticized at the time by monitors from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe as fraught with balloting violations. The vote, which kept Shevardnadze in office, rocked Western faith in the country’s ability to reform.

In the grand new Tbilisi suburb, the houses jostle the eye, competing for height as though a mob of frustrated Soviet architects had run amok. But don’t wander too close or ask too many questions about the owners, a foreman at the construction site of one home warned journalists last year.

“A brick might fall on your head. We wouldn’t want that,” he growled. “Now get out of here. I’m fed up with you.”

Advertisement

The story of the house that Tbilisi police chief Iosif Alavidze built shows the lines of patronage in Georgian society, and the point at which these fray and snap.

In a controversy over the mansion’s construction last spring, Alavidze drew support from his boss, Interior Minister Kakha Targamadze, a Shevardnadze loyalist. Insisting that there was no evidence of corruption, Targamadze argued that the mansion was not registered in the name of Alavidze but the chief’s relatives.

But Targamadze would not last long in his post. Nor would Alavidze, nor some of his neighbors in the exclusive new suburb, such as Security Minister Vakhtang Kutateladze and his deputy, Simon Nozadze.

Alavidze resigned last summer, after photos of his and Kutateladze’s mansions were brandished in a government meeting by Justice Minister Mikheil Saakashvili, an ambitious young populist who made his name campaigning against corruption.

Saakashvili was the next to go, resigning in anger a month later and accusing Shevardnadze of failing to tackle corruption.

The clamor for action reached a head last fall. Angry street protests called for the resignation of government leaders after agents from the Ministry of Security, the successor to the Soviet-era KGB, attempted to raid independent television station Rustavi 2, which specializes in airing exposes on state corruption.

Advertisement

Entire Cabinet Sacked

Shevardnadze, weakened and unpopular, was forced to accept the resignations of Kutateladze, who had ordered the raid, and Targamadze. The president then sacked the entire Cabinet, though many of the ministers were reappointed. Nozadze later stepped down.

The shake-up cheered Georgia’s anti-corruption campaigners and brought significant change to the upper echelons of the Ministry of Security, with a new and more open generation sweeping in.

But despite these positive signs, many analysts see the steps as too little too late.

Alexander Rondeli, director of the Georgian Foundation for Strategic and International Studies, a think tank here, said the public wants an end to corruption in the Interior and Security ministries and has been disappointed by Shevardnadze’s lack of action.

“If you promise to do something a second time and fail, people’s trust is completely exhausted,” he said. “Shevardnadze started some changes but could not or did not want to continue them.”

Rondeli said that the reforms at the Ministry of Security were encouraging but that the changes at the Interior Ministry were limited to the minister’s resignation.

“People have more contact with the Interior Ministry in life,” he said. “It’s the police, the law. People want to feel some tangible change.”

Advertisement

The president’s critics argue that the superficiality of his fight against corruption sends pessimistic signals about Georgia’s prospects.

Amid growing criticism, Shevardnadze relies for his survival on U.S. support, and the fact that there is no obvious figure to replace him.

In October, he negotiated an agreement with President Bush to bring American soldiers here to train and equip a Georgian anti-terrorist force. The deal is popular with Georgians.

Shevardnadze is respected in the West as the former Soviet foreign minister who helped end the Cold War, but his approval rating among Georgians hovered at just 9% in recent opinion polls.

The problem of corruption is deeply rooted. When Georgia was under Russian control in czarist and Soviet times, it was almost a point of honor to get around regulations laid down a thousand or more miles away. But this eroded respect for the law.

“This contempt for Soviet law has produced a kind of nihilism and a contempt for all laws, even though they’re now the laws of an independent country,” said Lieven, the analyst.

Advertisement

The family is the bedrock of Georgian culture, and people rely on powerful clan figures for protection, jobs, favors and goods or services.

“The family takes precedence over everything else, including the law,” Lieven said. “If everybody’s loyalty is to their family, and the junior officials see the senior officials are themselves plundering the state, it becomes terribly difficult to create an ethic of national patriotism.”

Journalists who criticize Shevardnadze, such as Akaki Gogichaishvili, anchor of Rustavi 2’s investigative program “60 Minutes,” tend to get angry calls from the president’s wife, Nanuli. (The program is not related to the U.S. show of the same name.)

Gogichaishvili says he has received anonymous death threats for his reports, which often implicate officials in corruption. He alleges that he received such threats in June 2000 from the prosecutor general’s office, an accusation denied by the agency. Once, the brakes on his car were tampered with, the journalist says, and recently, he adds, someone fired a shot through the window of his office, which was unoccupied at the time.

Gogichaishvili believes that it was a warning shot to scare his team off as they prepared a report on a Georgian army colonel who for years allegedly had funneled Russian arms to criminals in the lawless Pankisi Gorge, in northeastern Georgia.

The program was aired recently. The colonel has not been arrested or charged.

Rustavi 2 journalist Georgi Sanaya was slain in July while investigating suspected links between government officials and criminals in the gorge.

Advertisement

Valery Khaburdzania, the current security minister, has opened an investigation into claims that officials from the Interior Ministry or other agencies cooperated with criminals or Chechen rebels based in the gorge.

Gogichaishvili argues that Shevardnadze had no real base of support when he came to power and that he won the loyalty of officials by turning a blind eye as they grew rich through corruption.

“So there’s really no way that Shevardnadze would fight against corruption,” he said. “During all the years of the fight against corruption, there has not been a single person who has been charged or jailed.”

*

Alexei V. Kuznetsov of The Times’ Moscow Bureau contributed to this report.

Advertisement