Can Rubio or Bush help Republicans finally win Latino vote in 2016?
Once an afterthought, Latino voters have moved to the center of the 2016 presidential campaign, the object of early and unprecedented courtship by candidates on both sides.
The efforts, both substantive and symbolic, reflect a political map that has changed dramatically with the transformation of states such as Nevada, Colorado and others that are no longer the white, Republican bastions of old.
President Obama twice carried Nevada, Colorado, Virginia and Florida, thanks in good part to strong support among their growing Latino populations; in Nevada, the Latino share of the vote has tripled in the last 20 years.
All four are once more expected to be among the few competitive states in 2016.
A key question is whether the eventual Democratic nominee can cement those gains for elections to come, or Republicans can reverse their dismal performance of the last two presidential contests and, by doing so, expand their narrow path to the White House.
Republicans seem to stand their best chance in years of harvesting Latino support with the candidacy of Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, the son of Cuban immigrants; and the expected run by the state’s former governor, Jeb Bush, whose wife is Mexican-born and who is fluent in both the Spanish language and Latino culture.
Every week seemingly brings a new Bush appearance before Latino voters — a town hall in Puerto Rico, a speech to evangelical leaders in Houston — where he delivers, in English and Spanish, a message unlike any heard from previous Republican presidential hopefuls.
First, though, he and Rubio have to navigate their party’s nominating process, a course dominated by white conservatives who favor a hard-line approach to immigration reform, the very issue that has driven so many Latinos into the arms of Democrats.
“In essence, Hispanic voters tell us our party’s position … has become a litmus test, measuring whether we are meeting them with a welcome mat or a closed door,” members of a Republican task force wrote in a postmortem after the party’s nominee, Mitt Romney, won fewer than 3 in 10 Latino votes in 2012.
The most specific policy recommendation in the 97-page autopsy was support for comprehensive immigration reform, which, translated, means going beyond the law enforcement remedies favored by the party’s bedrock supporters. Of the top-tier candidates, only Bush and Rubio have embraced that approach.
It was hardly coincidental that Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton last week unveiled her immigration policy in Las Vegas or that, in doing so, she checked off much of the wish list of Latino activists, including a path to citizenship for millions of people in the country illegally and more compassionate enforcement of the country’s border laws.
Nevada enjoys a prominent place on the nominating calendar, now slotted as the third to vote after contests in Iowa and New Hampshire. But more than that, the state mirrors the broad demographic changes that are reshaping politics across the country by the day.
In 1994, more than 90% of Nevada voters were white, a number that shrank to 67% in 2012. Over the same period, the Latino share of voters grew from 5% to 15%, a percentage expected to increase further by 2016.
(Nationally, Latinos accounted for 10% of the vote in the last presidential race. They are expected to account for nearly half of the growth in the eligible electorate between now and 2030, according to research by the nonpartisan Pew Hispanic Center.)
If a Democrat hopes to be president, he or she must not only reassemble Obama’s winning coalition, which included Latinos and other minorities, but ensure that those voters turn out in robust numbers. Clinton’s immigration proposals seem calculated to do just that, leaving Republicans the unpalatable choice of seconding her views — and alienating their conservative base — or rejecting them and risking further estrangement from Latino voters.
Nevada offers an object lesson.
Last year, with a virtually uncontested governor’s race and little effort by state Democrats to spur turnout, Latino voters stayed home in droves. As a result, Republicans not only swept every statewide constitutional office, they knocked off a supposedly safe Democratic House member here in Las Vegas and seized control of the state Legislature for the first time since the 1920s.
“Democrats can’t take those voters for granted,” said David Damore, a University of Nevada, Las Vegas, expert on Latino political participation. “They need to spend money on outreach, get-out-the-vote, Spanish-language advertising. Without them, Democrats don’t win.”
Clinton apparently got the message: Two of her first Nevada hires, campaign director Emmy Ruiz and organizing director Jorge Neri, helped Obama win 70% of the state’s Latino vote in 2012.
For Republicans, the imperative is less urgent, given their overwhelming support among white male voters. But their nominee can’t afford a Romney-style blowout.
Whit Ayres, a veteran GOP pollster working for Rubio, believes the party’s eventual nominee will need to win more than 40% of the Latino vote to carry the White House, a performance only two Republicans — Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush — have approached in the last 35 years. (Obama won 67% of the Latino vote in 2008 and 71% in 2012.)
This time Bush’s brother, Jeb, has been most conspicuous in his courtship of Latino support. “We’re an immigrant nation and we should be proud,” he recently told supporters during a stop in Puerto Rico. “I know about the immigrant experience because I married a beautiful girl from Mexico. My children are bicultural and bilingual.”
Rubio, of course, needn’t reach to make that cultural connection. If anything, he seems to downplay his Latino heritage as he appeals to white conservative audiences.
But implicit in his very candidacy is the chance for Republicans to make history by nominating their first-ever minority standard-bearer, who, as a youthful Latino, reflects the demographic wave inexorably remaking the country, state by state.
For decades, Latinos were characterized — patronized, some said — as a slumbering giant: large in number, potentially powerful but largely apathetic and politically impotent. No more.
Now voters such as Santos Garcia have become highly sought-after.
“They’re going to want our support,” said Garcia, a 59-year-old kitchen worker at Harrah’s casino on the Las Vegas Strip. “Without the Spanish vote they know they can’t win. So they’re going to come look for us.”
Get our Essential Politics newsletter
The latest news, analysis and insights from our politics teams from Sacramento to D.C.
You may occasionally receive promotional content from the Los Angeles Times.