Dear Liz: I am reasonably well off thanks to hard work, some luck and a hard-earned (by my mother) inheritance. I don't spend much because I prefer a simple life, so the money has piled up over the decades.
I have two children. One has a college degree, a decent job, and is saving for retirement. The other dropped out, became an actor and lives hand-to-mouth, getting very little paid-acting work. I want to help my kids while I'm alive, not wait to leave them money. I will help my worker bee to buy a home but I am at a loss how to help my actor. I hate to reward a lifestyle of "I can't work a 9-to-5 job because I need to be free to audition." On the other hand, don't affluent parents help their artistic kids pursue their dreams?
What kind of financial advisor or family dynamics expert can I consult? Do you have any suggestions? I don't need a money manager as the funds are handled well already. I need help to disburse funds in keeping with my values.
Answer: Talk to your estate planning attorney. If you don't have one, get one. These professionals do more than draw up wills and trusts to distribute your assets after you're gone. They also can help advise you about disbursements during your lifetime, including any gift tax implications. A fee-only financial planner who charges by the hour could be another good resource for you.
In answer to your question about affluent parents, some do help their children pursue dreams that aren't wildly remunerative. The parents might supplement the income of an altruistic daughter who wants to teach in a low-income school or a talented son who needs time to build up a portfolio of artwork for a gallery show. It's the parents' choice, obviously, and there's certainly no requirement they support career choices they think are questionable.
You have many options to be fair to your kids without enabling them. For example, you could put aside an amount equal to the down payment you're giving your daughter and let your son know the money's available when he's "ready" to buy a home. That is so much nicer than saying, "When you snap out of your delusion that you're going to make a living in a field where so few actually do."
Obsessing over taxes is foolish
Dear Liz: Most of your articles are from people who have not yet retired. I am retired and always expected to be making less money now than when I was working. But the opposite has happened. I am making almost twice as much and I have a lot of money in stocks, which have increased dramatically. I want to travel and use that money but anything I sell will be taxed at the 25% rate. Any ideas how to get my money out and be able to use it?
Answer: Sure. Place a sell order, set aside 25% for taxes and enjoy your life while you still have a life to enjoy. If you'd like to reduce your yearly tax bill, consider bumping up your charitable contributions to help those who aren't so fortunate.
Paying taxes is not fun, but obsessing about ways to avoid them or letting them dictate your decisions is foolish. You'll still be far better off than you expected to be after you pay Uncle Sam, and you'll have the cash to do what you want. So do it.
Hard to predict tax rates
Dear Liz: I read your column answer to the 40-year-old who asked about regular 401(k) versus Roth 401(k) contributions. Obviously, the answer has more moving parts than you have space for. However, using before-tax dollars for the 401(k) gives him a small break now, but when he hits 70 1/2, those dollars will impact the taxability of his Social Security benefits. He could contribute to the 401(k) with after-tax dollars, get the company match and avoid that impact 30 years in the future, right?
Answer: The "right" answer requires knowing what tax rates will be 30 years in the future, at a time when no one is entirely sure what tax rates will be next year. Which means the smart approach is to hedge one's bets. Given the original reader's current financial situation, that translates into focusing most contributions into the pretax 401(k) but also making contributions to the Roth. That will give him some flexibility to control his tax bill in retirement without going "all in" on the bet that his tax rate then will be higher than it is now.