Expect Rian Johnson to push 'Star Wars' in unexpected directions

Rian Johnson's past work is an indication -- sort of -- of where he might take 'Star Wars'
Expect Rian Johnson to try to push the second film of the new 'Star Wars' trilogy in unexpected directions

If you were seeking a director to take the reins of the "Star Wars" franchise, you might not think Rian Johnson would be quite the droid you were looking for. Just ask Johnson himself. "I don't think I'm on those sorts of lists," he told an interviewer in early 2013 amid speculation over who would spearhead the newly relaunched series. "I don’t think it’s a problem that I’ll have to deal with."

Well, so much for that. 

On Friday Johnson was announced as the writer and director for "Star Wars: Episode VIII," the sequel to J.J. Abrams' upcoming installment. It's impossible, of course, to know exactly what Johnson has in mind for "Star Wars" — many Bothan spies would need to die to get that information. Unlike "Episode VII" director Abrams, though, whose successful "Star Trek" reboot almost looks in retrospect like an elaborate audition for the "Star Wars" gig, Johnson's own eclectic body of work doesn't on the face of it provide a clear indication of where he might steer the universe George Lucas created.

If there's been any consistent through-line to Johnson's work to date, it's been the lack of a consistent through-line. Johnson has a predilection for jumping between genres -- and then subverting them. His breakthrough movie, 2005's "Brick," was a whip-smart fusion of a high school movie and a hard-boiled noir, and 2008's "The Brother's Bloom" was a family dramedy in the guise of a con-man movie. 2012's "Looper" was a formally daring combination of hit-man drama and time-travel head trip.

Given this pedigree, we can expect Johnson to try to push the second film of the trilogy in unexpected directions. Asked in the past to run down some of his favorite films, Johnson name-checked Terry Gilliam's "Brazil" — a gonzo dystopian sci-fi film that's hardly a popcorn flick. "My favorite sci-fi always uses its hook to amplify some bigger theme or idea — some emotional thrust," he once said.

That said, as the steward of the "Star Wars" universe, Johnson will have to play by a fairly orthodox set of rules. And, of course, he will need to deliver slam-bang action and eye-popping spectacle on a level he's never demonstrated before. While he may have a personal penchant for cerebral cinematic jigsaw puzzles like the one he created with "Looper," this is a "Star Wars" film we're talking about — and, to quote Pauline Kael, a "Star Wars" movie, as much as anything, is like "a box of Cracker Jack which is all prizes."

While Johnson's specific vision for "Star Wars" may not be clear right now, there are other things we can safely discern from the news. First, it obviously puts to rest the widely held assumption that Abrams or any other single figure would oversee the entire trilogy. In tapping Johnson — along with Josh Trank ("Chronicle") and Gareth Edwards ("Godzilla"), who have been brought on to direct a pair of spinoff films — Disney and Lucasfilm appear to be following a model more commonly seen in TV, where bringing in different directors to helm different episodes is standard practice. Presumably there will be a degree of consistency to the trilogy — after all, there are a whole lot of toys to be sold here — but the idea of each film bearing a slightly different creative fingerprint, as in the "Harry Potter" series, is an intriguing one.

Beyond that, it's now apparent that, far from having a grand overarching plan, Disney and Lucasfilm are largely mapping out the future of the "Star Wars" franchise as they go along. Where George Lucas once claimed he had 12 "Star Wars" movies sketched out in his head, the handoff from Abrams to Johnson to presumably a third director to be named later (we'll refrain from any wild speculation for now) gives the impression of a multibillion-dollar franchise being created on the run. That may seem somewhat risky, but there's something undeniably exciting about it — and, in a Han Solo, shoot-from-the-hip kind of way, something fitting about it as well.

Follow @joshrottenberg for the stories behind Hollywood's biggest movies

Copyright © 2014, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • Artists and filmmakers make surprising leaps in 2014
    Artists and filmmakers make surprising leaps in 2014

    Exhibiting raw promise is one thing, but to exceed those initial flashes is something really special. Throughout this year, many filmmakers and performers were pressing on in remarkable ways, showing that even artists who have already exhibited notable skill, talent and accomplishment still...

  • Mark Olsen's best indie films of 2014
    Mark Olsen's best indie films of 2014

    Throughout the year people you thought you knew showed they were still full of surprises. In 2014, when some would see cinema as a storytelling mode and cultural force as an endangered species, these are vital signs of life. Here is Mark Olsen's top ten list of independent films:

  • Kenneth Turan's best films of 2014
    Kenneth Turan's best films of 2014

    What's the point of doing a 10 best list if you put only 10 films on it?

  • Daring films lifted the artform in 2014
    Daring films lifted the artform in 2014

    Like voices crying in the wilderness — rising above that vast wasteland of movie mediocrity — came the roar of the auteurs in 2014. A rangy group with varying aesthetics, they've left an indelible imprint on cinema despite the 400 or so of the marginal that clogged our theaters...

  • Everyone loses in a December deluge of films
    Everyone loses in a December deluge of films

    I try not to publicly argue with film legends, even those who are no longer alive. But when Mae West famously said that "too much of a good thing can be wonderful," she clearly was not considering a film critic's lot in December.

  • Goodbyes abound in 'Night at the Museum' as trilogy comes to an end
    Goodbyes abound in 'Night at the Museum' as trilogy comes to an end

    "Night at the Museum: Secret of the Tomb," otherwise known as "Night at the Museum 3," rates as more determinedly heartfelt than the first and not as witty as the second (and best). Also, no Amy Adams as Amelia Earhart in jodhpurs this time around.