Los Angeles Times

Daum: Inside the mating economy

Kate Bolick is an attractive, educated and professionally accomplished 39-year-old who despite 20 years of dating and a string of steady relationships has — cue the ominous organ music — never married. In a long (at 12,000 words, very long) article that's part personal essay, part enfilade of facts, stats and interviews with experts, she tells her story in the Atlantic this month. It doesn't end happily ever after — at least it hasn't so far — but this leaves Bolick not so much sad or even angry but surprised by what she's found: a dating pool of men who increasingly cannot keep up with their female counterparts.

That conclusion, which landed her on the "Today" show and made her the subject of countless blog posts, tweets and newspaper columns (none of which, including this one, have the space to adequately represent the scope of her article), mostly earns Bolick the predictable charges of being a man hater or a casualty of feminism, particularly the kind heralded by '70s-era moms who raised their daughters to become, in Gloria Steinem's words, "the men they wanted to marry."

I've always hated that quote, not least because it assumes all women want to get married in the first place. Bolick, wisely, seems more interested in data than slogans. Citing statistics from another Atlantic story published last year, "The End of Men," Bolick points out that women earned 60% of all bachelor's and master's degrees in 2010 and held 51.4% of all managerial and professional jobs. Nearly three-quarters of jobs lost in the recession were held by men. Last year, women constituted most of the American workforce.

Translation: An educated, well-compensated woman over 35 is out of luck in the dating economy. Not just for Darwinian reasons (as fertility decreases, so does attractiveness and therefore "market value") but for a very new, very unsettling reason: Men traditionally considered marriageable by such women (their wage equals or betters) are rapidly becoming an elite minority.

Of course, at the same time that Bolick's basic question — Is marriage still a significant benefit to women? — was shorting out buzzometers everywhere, another urgent brouhaha was trending fast: The Occupy Wall Street (and points north, south, east and west) protests. The sprawl of both phenomena is striking: The Bolick crowd is tackling feminism, love, monogamy and the history of matrilineal family systems; the protesters are taking on corporate greed, healthcare deficits, environmental destruction and nuclear proliferation. But both also clearly, unavoidably boil down to this: an economy that's just not functioning in most people's interest.

Here's something worth noting: One of the constituencies of this year's Arab Spring movement are young men who have their own marriageability problems, because of joblessness and lack of access to education. On our own protest front lines, a heck of a lot of the young men might fit into a similar cohort.

It's hard not to watch Occupy Everywhere without thinking about Bolick's article. Sure, the face painters and zombie-costume wearers seem to be getting the most airplay. But look a little closer and you see a lot of ordinary guys whose currency in the world has been pulled out from under them, who might be considered "unmarriageable" by women who've found equality just about everywhere except in a partner.

Maybe Bolick and her single friends should trot their Jimmy Choos down to the rallies and take these men out to dinner (OK, not the ones whose hardworking wives wouldn't appreciate the gesture). As Bolick points out, the women who are coping best with the new order are those most willing to recalibrate their expectations: "Whether it's women choosing to be with much younger men, or men choosing to be with women more financially successful than they are (or both at once)."

That won't solve the economic crisis, but at least it's a start. In the meantime, as someone who remained happily unmarried until the geriatric age of 39 (and, for the record, is also now happily married), let me say this: There are far worse things than being single. For instance, marrying the man you wanted to become rather than becoming who you are.

mdaum@latimescolumnists.com

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • To Obama, family leave is a family value

    To Obama, family leave is a family value

    In rolling out the issues he hopes will define the final two years of his administration, President Obama has proposed two workplace initiatives: requiring companies with 15 or more employees to provide them seven days of sick leave per year to their full time workers, and encouraging states to...

  • Parents don't owe their kids a college education

    It’s hard for parents to win these days. First they’re criticized for being helicopter parents who won’t let go of their children once their offspring reach adulthood. Now, at least in New Jersey, they can’t let go: They’re on the hook to pay for their children’s college education.

  • Near Ferguson, a struggle that begins before kindergarten

    Near Ferguson, a struggle that begins before kindergarten

    While the nation was focused on Ferguson, Mo., this summer, my attention was on a St. Louis kindergarten classroom not far from where Michael Brown was shot and killed by a white police officer. Within weeks of her East Coast college graduation, my daughter, Casey, made an unexpected detour, moving...

  • Can kids be good without God? Watch our video discussion with Patt Morrison and Phil Zuckerman

    Can kids be good without God? Watch our video discussion with Patt Morrison and Phil Zuckerman

    Holidays that began literally as "holy days" have become shopping and vacation opportunities. Chairs at Sunday brunch tables fill up, while pews in Sunday church services get emptier. A fifth of Americans – and one-third of Americans under the age of 30 – mark "none" as their religious affiliation,...

  • The egg-freezing benefit -- family friendly, or corporate control?

    Here are three things you can always count on: death, taxes and that anything related to motherhood or women's reproductive choices will stir up enough cultural debate to make everyone forget about death and taxes for a news cycle or two.

  • A Supreme Court quote anti-vaxxers will love

    A Supreme Court quote anti-vaxxers will love

    The refusal of many parents to vaccinate their children against measles has become a political story.  Some (but not all) Republican presidential hopefuls are giving aid and comfort to anti-vaxxers. Meanwhile, some have argued (unpersuasively) that President Obama is guilty of the same sort of...

Comments
Loading
71°