Sign up for the Essential California newsletter to get great stories delivered to your inbox
Nation Nation Now

Obama says his new carbon regulation is about 'health of our kids'

Obama on new EPA rule: "Health of our kids" is at stake
Obama on critics of new EPA rule: Their claims are debunked by the facts
Obama's last bit of business before Europe trip -- a pitch for his new carbon pollution rule

President Obama began a campaign for his newly proposed climate change proposal with an appeal Monday to parents and grandparents worried about “the health of our kids and the health of our planet.”

In an afternoon conference call with the American Lung Assn. and other public health groups, Obama argued that restrictions on power plant emissions would help children with asthma and other health problems exacerbated by carbon pollution.

A mother with a sick kid can control dust in her home and exposure to allergens, Obama said, “but she can’t control the pollution.”

“For the sake of our children,” he said, “we’re going to have to do a little more.”

In his first public comments about the plan, Obama brushed off complaints from critics that “these guidelines will kill jobs or crush the economy.”

“These claims are debunked when you actually give workers and businesses the tools that they need to innovate,” Obama said, pointing to the technological advances in fuel-efficient cars and appliances encouraged by government over the past few years.

“In America,” he said, “we do not have to choose between the health of our economy and the health of our kids.”

He placed the call from the Oval Office, making it his only public business on Monday before leaving for a week in Europe.

With the new proposal, Obama hopes to cut greenhouse gases by 30% from their 2005 level by 2030.

The unveiling on Monday begins a one-year period of comment and review, during which business interests and advocates will lobby for change. As expected, it set off a fresh debate over the wisdom of the regulation.

Business leaders and Republican skeptics began to critique the particulars of the plan. Before the rule was unveiled, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce estimated it would cost the economy $50 billion annually.

The EPA, meanwhile, said that, in the year 2030, the reductions in carbon pollution would result in “net climate and health benefits of $48 billion to $82 billion,” according to the agency’s proposal.

Administration officials also argued that the plan is sensitive to the special needs in some heavily coal-reliant states. The plan is designed give each state a menu of options for meeting their specific targets, officials pointed out, noting that each is based on the particular state’s fuel mix.

Copyright © 2015, Los Angeles Times
Related Content
  • New EPA rule would seek to cut carbon emissions 30% by 2030
    New EPA rule would seek to cut carbon emissions 30% by 2030

    The Obama administration will seek to cut greenhouse gas emissions from existing power plants 30% from 2005 levels by 2030, potentially one of the biggest steps any country has taken to confront climate change, people familiar with the plan said Sunday.

  • Why fixing Indiana's religious freedom law may not be easy
    Why fixing Indiana's religious freedom law may not be easy

    Gov. Mike Pence said that he wants lawmakers to “work around the clock,” to find a fix for a state law that critics say allows for discrimination against gays and lesbians by those with opposing religious beliefs. But finding a legislative fix in an atmosphere of economic boycotts...